Ahead of the November 3 midterms, one commentator bets on the market's future by leaning on a long memory: since 1950, the S&P 500 has risen in the twelve months after every midterm vote, a pattern that suggests Congress's changing hands may clear away uncertainty rather than bring ruin. Yet the same observer admits that nobody truly knows what comes next, and that recent midterm rallies have been far more modest than the historic average. The question hanging over the country is whether a shifting balance of power in Washington will ease or deepen the strain of war, fuel prices, and the artif
Why One Fool Columnist Expects Stocks to Soar After the 2026 Midterm Elections
Once the votes are counted, investors at least have certainty to plan around.
Why does a midterm election matter to the stock market at all?
The columnist's point is uncertainty. Before the vote, a change in Congress could reshape policy for whole sectors. Afterward, even a result investors dislike gives them something to plan around for two years.
And the track record is strong?
JPMorgan's research says the S&P 500 was positive over the 12 months after every midterm since 1950, averaging roughly 15%.
Worth separating the two claims there. Positive every time is a striking record. The 15% is an average, and the recent years fell well short of it.
Right. Since 2000, gains came close in 2002 and 2022, topped 10% in 2018, and were roughly 4% to 7% in 2006, 2010 and 2014.
So what's the case for this time?
Gridlock, mostly. Democrats are given over 91% odds for the House and 67% for the Senate, but a presidential veto and the filibuster limit what they can pass.
Those odds are Kalshi's, a prediction market, not a certainty. And the whole piece is opinion. The columnist even says nobody knows what will happen.
Are there risks the author names?
Yes. AI data centers could face opposition, and the author has doubts about valuations and a fourth year of a bull market.
One thing remains unproven: that a Democratic Congress actually ends the Iran war or lowers gas prices. That is a hope, not a finding.
El Pulso
- A war in Iran and stubbornly high gas prices weigh on a nation already split along partisan lines as voters head to the polls on November 3.
- Investors search the midterm results for signals about the next two years of policy, bracing for the possibility of a Democratic House and Senate.
- Advisers urge patience: stay invested, stay diversified, and resist the urge to trade around the election while earnings continue to grow.
- The market sits near its highs with valuations stretched and an AI rally that may face new pressure from data center opposition, leaving the post-midterm path open and uncertain.
Ahead of the November 3 midterms, one commentator bets on the market's future by leaning on a long memory: since 1950, the S&P 500 has risen in the twelve months after every midterm vote, a pattern that suggests Congress's changing hands may clear away uncertainty rather than bring ruin. Yet the same observer admits that nobody truly knows what comes next, and that recent midterm rallies have been far more modest than the historic average. The question hanging over the country is whether a shifting balance of power in Washington will ease or deepen the strain of war, fuel prices, and the artificial intelligence boom that has carried stocks for years.
On November 3, Americans will vote for the House and Senate, and a Motley Fool columnist has already made a bold forecast: stocks will climb in the months that follow. He is candid that this is opinion rather than certainty, and that no one truly knows how the next chapter will unfold.
The moment is tense. The country is deeply partisan, the Iran war looms over daily life, and investors are watching the results for clues about the policies of the next two years. The columnist also acknowledges real worries: enthusiasm around artificial intelligence, a bull market entering its fourth year, and valuations that have stayed high for a long time.
His case rests on history. JPMorgan Chase research shows the S&P 500 has been positive in the twelve months after every midterm since 1950, averaging roughly 15%. The logic is that uncertainty peaks before the vote, and once results are known, investors can plan around them. JPMorgan strategist Jordan Jackson advised staying invested and diversified rather than trading the election itself.
The columnist does not oversell it. Recent post-midterm gains have been far smaller, often 4 to 7 percent, and he concedes that history does not always repeat. Prediction markets give Democrats a strong chance of retaking the House and a fair chance at the Senate. Such a shift could help end the Iran war sooner, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and ease gas prices and inflation, but it could also threaten the data centers that AI relies on.
His optimism ultimately leans on gridlock, which markets often prefer, since divided government makes sweeping laws hard to pass. What to watch is whether a new Congress truly changes course, and whether the post-midterm rally arrives, even if it falls short of the historic average.
On Nov. 3, voters across the United States will cast ballots in races for the U.S. House and the U.S. Senate, and a Motley Fool columnist has already staked out a prediction: stocks will soar in the months that follow. It is an opinion piece, not a report, and the author is candid that nobody actually knows what will happen.
The backdrop is a tense one. Politics is as partisan as ever, and the Iran war hangs over the country. Investors, the columnist writes, will be reading the results for clues about what policy looks like over the next two years. The author also admits to real reservations about the market itself: the enthusiasm around artificial intelligence, a bull market that is about to finish its fourth year, and valuations that have been elevated for some time.
Still, the argument rests on history. The columnist points to JPMorgan Chase research showing that since 1950, the S&P 500 has been positive over the 12 months after every midterm election, with an average gain of roughly 15%. The logic is straightforward. The run-up to a midterm is full of uncertainty because a shake-up in Congress could change policy and hit particular sectors, or the whole market. Once the votes are counted, whether or not investors like the outcome, they have more certainty to plan around.
JPMorgan Global Market Strategist Jordan Jackson put it this way in a research note on Oct. 7: history favors investors after midterms, and an environment of solid earnings, steady growth, strong investment and a less aggressive Fed than feared supports the case that this cycle can follow the pattern. His advice was not to trade around the election, but to stay invested, remain diversified and focus on longer-term drivers of returns.
The columnist is careful not to oversell the pattern. Since 2000, the S&P 500 has been positive in the year after every midterm, but it has rarely reached that 15% average. It came close in 2002 and 2022 and topped 10% in 2018. In 2006, 2010 and 2014, the gains were between roughly 4% and 7%. As of this writing, the index stood at 7,623.68, down 0.52% on the day, within a 52-week range of 6,316.91 to 7,844.52.
The political forecast is lopsided. According to prediction market Kalshi, Democrats have better than a 91% chance of retaking the House and a 67% chance of winning back the Senate. The columnist sees both upside and downside for stocks in that outcome. A Democratic Congress would likely make it harder for President Donald Trump to continue the Iran war, and a quicker end could more fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz and, over time, bring down gas prices and inflation. On the other side, Democrats are likely to be more opposed to the data centers AI depends on, which could eventually pressure the AI stocks that have powered the market for several years.
The columnist's bullishness ultimately leans on gridlock, which Wall Street tends to favor because it makes sweeping legislation harder to pass. Even with both chambers, Democrats would face Trump's veto power, and overriding it takes a two-thirds majority in the House and Senate. Getting past a Senate filibuster would also require them to outperform dramatically. Meanwhile, corporate earnings keep growing at a strong pace, and the author concludes that timing a reset or crash is nearly impossible.
What to watch after Nov. 3 is whether a Democratic House, and possibly Senate, actually shifts the course of the Iran war, gas prices and AI data center policy, and whether the market's post-midterm record holds, even if the gain falls short of the 15% average.
Citas Notables
Rather than trying to trade around the election, investors should stay invested, remain diversified and keep their focus on the longer-term drivers of returns.— Jordan Jackson, JPMorgan Global Market Strategist, Oct. 7 research note