Vučić concedes defeat as Serbia's student movement wins in record-turnout election

Sixteen people were killed in the November 2024 Novi Sad railway station canopy collapse that sparked the protests.
Tonight we celebrate victory, tomorrow we build the future.
Professor Radomir Saičić spoke for the students at the Student List headquarters after Vučić conceded.
Mark

Vučić conceded fast. Why does that matter as much as the result itself?

Mimi

Because people were openly wondering whether he'd try to hold on anyway. He stood in front of his own supporters and said they had lost, and gave numbers close to the pollsters' own.

Luke

But those are still preliminary. He cited a sample, and CeSID-IPSPS projected 138 seats for the students and 104 for the SNS. Final results aren't in.

Mark

What got the students here?

Mimi

The Novi Sad canopy collapse in November 2024, which killed 16 people. Evidence pointed to shoddy construction and corruption, and the protests grew from there.

Mark

And the campaign itself wasn't a level field.

Mimi

No. The SNS had taken over almost all broadcast channels and used state institutions as tools. The students went door to door and into rural areas that had been Vučić strongholds.

Luke

Worth saying the monitors reported problems on election day: ballot photographing, attempted vote-buying, carousel voting. CRTA said irregularities were continuing. We don't yet know how much that affected the outcome.

Mark

Is there a wider meaning?

Mimi

The reporting links it to elections elsewhere where the authoritarian right faces pro-democracy forces, and to Orbán's concession in Hungary six months ago.

Luke

That comparison is the paper's framing. What's confirmed is the turnout, 67.6% by 7pm, and a concession. What the students do with a majority is unknown.

  • Vučić conceded at his Belgrade headquarters after projections gave the Student List 135 to 140 of 250 seats against roughly 105 for his SNS.
  • Turnout hit 67.6%, the highest since 1992, with voters queuing for up to two hours and a student rally of an estimated 150,000 filling the capital the week before.
  • Independent monitors like CRTA logged photographed ballots, attempted vote-buying, carousel voting and rising violence outside polling stations, casting doubt on how clean the count was.
  • Students are racing to convert street momentum into governance, pledging accountability for the ousted government after the Novi Sad canopy collapse that killed 16.
  • Final results remain pending, and the question now is whether the new government delivers the reckoning that brought people into the streets.

On a Sunday night in Belgrade, a long-dominant leader acknowledged that the tide had turned, as a movement born in the grief of a collapsed railway canopy in Novi Sad prepared to take Serbia's parliament. The result is a reminder that public anger, once it finds a shared voice, can outlast even a decade of control over the state's institutions. Whether this becomes a durable democratic renewal or a fragile moment will depend on the slow work that follows the celebrations: counting every ballot, answering the irregularities that observers recorded, and keeping the promise of accountability made to those who lost sixteen people.

On Sunday night, at his party headquarters in Belgrade, Aleksandar Vučić told supporters he had lost. Preliminary figures gave the Student List between 135 and 140 of the 250 seats in parliament, against about 105 for his Serbian Progressive party. If the numbers hold, they end twelve years of his dominance and hand a majority to a movement that started in the streets.

The movement's roots lie in November 2024, when a concrete canopy collapsed at the Novi Sad railway station and killed 16 people. Students protested, and their anger widened into a campaign against a government that many believed had allowed shoddy construction and corruption to flourish. Last month Vučić resigned the presidency and called snap elections, gambling that his control of the broadcast media and state institutions would carry him through.

The students fielded 250 candidates, including academics, athletes and farmers, and asked voters to back a plan to rebuild the economy and restore democracy. Vučić answered with promises of higher pensions and salaries and accusations that the students were foreign puppets. The students responded with rallies, visits to rural strongholds and doorstep conversations under the slogan "Serbia or Mafia?"

Voters came out in historic numbers, with turnout at 67.6%, the highest since the breakup of Yugoslavia. Independent monitors, however, recorded photographed ballots, attempted vote-buying and carousel voting, along with growing violence near polling stations. Their warnings remain part of the story even as celebrations erupted across Belgrade and other cities, with horns sounding, strangers embracing and some people hugging police officers.

For many, the night felt like a long-awaited release. Ivana, 43, said it was like three New Year's Eves at once and that Serbians could finally breathe again. The next test is whether final counts confirm the outcome, whether irregularities are answered, and whether the promised accountability for the former leadership is delivered.

On Sunday night, at his party headquarters in Belgrade, Serbia's longtime leader Aleksandar Vučić told supporters that he had lost. Final results were not yet in, he said, but a sample made it clear: the Student List had won, with between 135 and 140 seats in the 250-seat parliament, and his side would have 105.

The pollsters' figures were close to his own. A representative sample from CeSID-IPSPS put the Student List at 138 deputies and Vučić's rightwing Serbian Progressive party, the SNS, at 104. The remaining seats were likely to go to parties representing ethnic national minorities. If the numbers hold, they end 12 years of Vučić's dominance and hand a parliamentary majority to a movement that began in the streets.

The day had already been historic. Long lines snaked out of polling stations across the country, and some voters reported waits of up to two hours. By 7pm local time, the monitors and pollsters CeSID and Ipsos put turnout at 67.6%, the highest since the breakup of Yugoslavia in 1992. The students' final pre-election rally in Belgrade the week before had drawn an estimated 150,000 people, and together the two signs fed early speculation that they had built enough support to open a new political era.

The story goes back to November 2024, when a concrete canopy collapsed at the Novi Sad railway station and killed 16 people. Students began protesting, and the movement grew into a broad campaign against the government as evidence pointed to slipshod construction, fraud and corruption behind the collapse. Over two years the pressure on Vučić mounted. Last month he resigned the presidency and gambled on snap elections.

The students turned the moment into a campaign. They put forward 250 candidates for the 250 seats, among them academics, athletes and farmers, and asked voters to back a plan to rebuild the economy and restore democracy. They faced a ruling party that had taken over almost all of the broadcast channels and used ministries and state institutions as political tools. Vučić accused the students of being stooges of foreign powers, which they denied. He promised higher pensions and public sector salaries and presented himself as the leader able to balance Serbia's ties with the west against those with Russia and China. The students answered with rallies, visits to rural areas that had long been Vučić strongholds, and door-to-door canvassing under the slogan "Serbia or Mafia?"

Dejan Bodiroga, a Student List candidate and president of Euroleague Basketball, voted in Belgrade on Sunday and echoed that framing. "Today, above all, Serbia is fighting for freedom and for the return of a country that has been hijacked," he told reporters.

The vote was not clean, according to independent observers. Before election day, international and local monitors had raised concerns about detentions and reports of surveillance and cyber-attacks against activists. On Sunday, independent groups recorded the photographing of ballots, which suggested pressure on voters, as well as attempted vote-buying and carousel voting. Raša Nedeljkov of the monitoring group CRTA said a large number of irregularities continued to be recorded and that violent incidents outside polling stations were becoming increasingly frequent.

Still, as word of the concession spread, people celebrated in Belgrade and other cities. Ivana, 43, said it felt like three New Year's Eves at once and that Serbians could finally breathe again; she hoped for swift accountability for top members of the ousted government, a key pledge of the Student List. Some people shook hands with and hugged police officers, and car horns sounded through the streets. At the Student List headquarters, supporters chanted "Victory, victory!" Radomir Saičić, a Belgrade University professor speaking for the students, said: "Tonight we celebrate victory, tomorrow we build the future."

Online, there had been speculation that Vučić might try to cling to power regardless. His quick concession recalled that of his ally Viktor Orbán in Hungary six months earlier. What to watch now are the final results, the response to the monitors' reports of irregularities, and whether the new government delivers the accountability its voters were promised.

On the basis of a sample, it is clear that we have lost these elections, the Student List has won.
— Aleksandar Vučić, speaking at SNS headquarters in Belgrade
A large number of irregularities continue to be recorded, while violent incidents outside polling stations are becoming increasingly frequent.
— Raša Nedeljkov, election monitor CRTA
Contattaci Domande frequenti