In Berlin, American envoys extended an offer that redraws the map of postwar possibility: security guarantees to Ukraine modeled on NATO's collective defense, without the formal membership that has long eluded Kyiv. European leaders spoke of a ceasefire as newly conceivable, while the war itself continued in the Black Sea and Moscow offered no sign of yielding. The moment captures a recurring tension in human affairs — the simultaneous pursuit of peace and the preparation for its failure.
US offers NATO-style security guarantees to Ukraine as peace talks show progress
For the first time, everyone was behaving like allies from one camp.
So the US is essentially offering to be Ukraine's security guarantor without making it a full NATO member. Why not just bring Ukraine into NATO if that's what they're offering?
Because NATO membership requires consensus from all 32 members, and some countries have resisted. This offer sidesteps that political problem. It's saying: we'll give you the military protection you need without the institutional commitment.
But how credible is that? A NATO guarantee is written into a treaty. This sounds like a political promise from Trump, which could change with the next administration.
That's the real question. Zelenskyy seems to be testing it—he's saying if Putin rejects this, he'll ask for more weapons and sanctions. He's not fully trusting the guarantee yet.
And Russia hasn't responded at all to these proposals?
Not publicly. Moscow hasn't indicated willingness to accept any of the changes discussed in Berlin. The territorial question is still the wall.
So we have optimism from European leaders, but no actual movement from Russia. That's worth noting—the talks are happening, but one side hasn't budged.
What about the submarine strike? Does that change the negotiating position?
Ukraine is showing it can still inflict significant damage. It's a message: we're not desperate, we can hurt you. But it also shows the war is continuing while talks happen.
And the frozen assets—that's a separate leverage point. The EU is deciding this week whether to use €210 billion of Russian money to help Ukraine.
Russia is suing for $230 billion in response?
Yes, but that's largely symbolic. The real question is whether the EU actually uses those frozen assets. That's where the financial pressure gets real.
The claims commission launching in The Hague is also important—it's building the legal case for reparations. Even if a ceasefire happens, Ukraine will be seeking compensation for years.
El Pulso
- For the first time, US envoys placed a NATO-style mutual defense commitment on the table in Berlin, a proposal that would have been dismissed as fantasy just months ago.
- European leaders emerged from the talks with cautious but genuine optimism — Poland's Tusk described feeling, for the first time, that everyone in the room was behaving as allies from the same camp.
- Russia has not agreed to any of the proposals discussed and has given no public signal it intends to, leaving the territorial question — how much of Ukraine Moscow keeps — entirely unresolved.
- Even as diplomats negotiated, Ukraine's SBU struck and disabled a Russian submarine at Novorossiysk in an unprecedented underwater drone operation, signaling Kyiv's refusal to negotiate from weakness.
- MI6's new chief warned that Putin is deliberately dragging out talks while probing Western limits just below the threshold of open conflict, casting doubt on Russia's sincerity at the table.
- The EU prepares to decide this week on deploying €210 billion in frozen Russian assets for Ukraine, while a new international claims commission convenes in The Hague to begin the legal reckoning for the war's destruction.
In Berlin, American envoys extended an offer that redraws the map of postwar possibility: security guarantees to Ukraine modeled on NATO's collective defense, without the formal membership that has long eluded Kyiv. European leaders spoke of a ceasefire as newly conceivable, while the war itself continued in the Black Sea and Moscow offered no sign of yielding. The moment captures a recurring tension in human affairs — the simultaneous pursuit of peace and the preparation for its failure.
Donald Trump's envoys arrived in Berlin on Monday carrying an offer few had anticipated: security guarantees for Ukraine modeled on NATO's collective defense commitments, a potential anchor for Kyiv's future without formal alliance membership. Trump, calling into a dinner with the key officials, told reporters the moment felt closer to resolution than ever before. "We're trying to get it done," he said.
The talks produced genuine optimism among European leaders for the first time since Russia's invasion began. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz called a ceasefire "conceivable." Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk described a shift in atmosphere — a sense that everyone present was finally behaving as allies. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson acknowledged the guarantees had grown "clearer and more credible," while cautioning that difficult questions about territory and Russian intentions remained unanswered.
Zelenskyy, speaking after the talks, outlined his conditions: if Putin rejected the proposals, Kyiv would seek intensified sanctions and additional weapons, including long-range systems. He also signaled openness to a narrow ceasefire on energy infrastructure over the Christmas period — a small but telling gesture toward negotiation.
Moscow, however, showed no movement. Russia agreed to nothing discussed in Germany, and the territorial question — how much of Ukraine it would retain — remained the central obstacle. Britain's MI6 chief, in her first public address, offered a sobering assessment: Putin was "dragging out negotiations" while testing Western resolve with tactics calibrated to stay just below the threshold of war.
The war itself did not pause for diplomacy. Ukrainian underwater drones struck and disabled a Russian Kilo-class submarine at Novorossiysk — the first operation of its kind, targeting the most difficult category of naval asset. Kyiv called it another turning point in the Black Sea contest.
On the financial front, the EU was preparing to decide whether to deploy €210 billion in frozen Russian assets as a loan to Ukraine, while Russia's central bank filed a $230 billion counterclaim against the Belgian clearinghouse holding those funds. In The Hague on Tuesday, an international claims commission was set to launch, bringing together dozens of senior figures to begin establishing legal and financial accountability for the war's destruction.
US officials made clear the security guarantee offer would not remain on the table indefinitely. European leaders, for their part, stressed that whatever emerges from these negotiations will shape their continent's security for a generation — a weight that hung over every conversation in Berlin.
Donald Trump's envoys arrived in Berlin on Monday with an offer that would have seemed unthinkable months earlier: the United States would provide security guarantees to Ukraine modeled on NATO's collective defense commitments. The proposal emerged from talks between the American negotiators and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, marking a significant shift in how Washington might anchor Kyiv's future security without full NATO membership. Trump himself, calling into a dinner with the key officials involved, said the moment felt closer to resolution than at any point before. "We're trying to get it done," he told reporters at the White House. "We had numerous conversations with President Putin of Russia, and I think we're closer now than we have been ever."
The Berlin talks generated genuine optimism among European leaders for the first time since Russia's invasion began. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the possibility of a ceasefire had become "conceivable." Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, departing Berlin, described a shift in the room's atmosphere—for the first time, he felt everyone was "behaving like allies from one camp." He emphasized that American negotiators had explicitly committed to military response if Russia attacked Ukraine again, a clarity that seemed to matter deeply to Warsaw. Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson acknowledged that security guarantees had become "clearer and more credible," though he cautioned that "many difficult questions remain, not least about territories and whether Russia wants peace at all."
Yet Moscow remained unmoved. Russia had not agreed to any of the changes discussed in Germany and showed no public indication it would. The territorial question—how much of Ukraine Russia would keep—remained the central sticking point. Zelenskyy, speaking after the talks, outlined his conditions for accepting any deal: if Putin rejected the proposals on the table, Kyiv would ask Washington for intensified sanctions against Russia and additional weapons, including long-range systems. He also signaled Ukrainian support for a ceasefire limited to energy infrastructure during the Christmas period, a narrow opening that suggested room for negotiation on the margins.
While diplomats talked in Berlin, the war continued. Ukrainian underwater drones, operated by the country's SBU security service and nicknamed "sub sea baby," struck and disabled a Russian Kilo-class attack submarine at the port of Novorossiysk on the Black Sea. It was the first operation of its kind—hitting a submarine, the most difficult naval target. A Ukrainian navy spokesperson called it "another turning point" in the naval contest between the two countries. The strike demonstrated Kyiv's capacity to inflict significant damage on Russian military assets even as peace talks advanced.
Britain's MI6 chief, Blaise Metreweli, offered a darker reading of Putin's intentions. In her first public speech since taking office, she said the Russian leader was "dragging out negotiations" and testing the West with tactics that stayed "just below the threshold of war." Putin remained determined, she argued, to "subjugate Ukraine and harass NATO members." The assessment suggested that even if talks continued, the underlying Russian strategy had not fundamentally shifted.
Meanwhile, the financial architecture of the conflict was taking shape. The EU was preparing to decide this week whether to use €210 billion in frozen Russian assets to provide Ukraine with a loan for defense and economic survival. Russia's central bank responded by filing a claim for $230 billion in damages against Euroclear, the Belgian clearinghouse holding much of those frozen funds—a warning shot against their use. The EU had already imposed nineteen packages of sanctions, yet Russia had adapted to most of them, continuing to sell millions of barrels of oil to India and China at discounted prices.
European leaders, including Zelenskyy, were scheduled to meet in The Hague on Tuesday to launch an international claims commission aimed at compensating Ukraine for hundreds of billions of dollars in damage from Russian attacks and alleged war crimes. The conference, co-hosted by the Netherlands and the 46-nation Council of Europe, would bring together dozens of senior figures including EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. The gathering represented an attempt to establish a legal and financial reckoning for the war's destruction, even as the fighting and negotiations continued in parallel.
US officials made clear that the security guarantee offer would not remain available indefinitely. The window for a deal, they suggested, was narrowing. European leaders stressed that whatever emerged from these talks would shape their continent's security for decades. The question now was whether Russia would engage seriously with any of it, or whether Putin would continue to test Western resolve while pursuing his stated objectives through military means.
Citas Notables
We're trying to get it done. We had numerous conversations with President Putin of Russia, and I think we're closer now than we have been ever.— Donald Trump
For the first time since the war began, the possibility of a ceasefire is conceivable.— German Chancellor Friedrich Merz
Putin is dragging out negotiations and remains determined to subjugate Ukraine and harass NATO members.— MI6 Chief Blaise Metreweli