UN backs Equal Earth map to show Africa's true size, ending centuries of Mercator distortion

Maps shape understanding. They guide education and influence perception.
Togo's Foreign Minister on why the vote matters beyond cartography.
Mark

So the UN didn't actually ban the Mercator map. They just said countries should use a different one. Does that actually change anything?

Mimi

The resolution is symbolic, yes, but symbols matter when they come from 164 countries voting together. It signals that the distortion was real and that accuracy is worth pursuing. Whether schools and publishers actually switch depends on them now.

Luke

Right, and we should be clear: this is an encouragement, not a mandate. The reporting says it "encourages" adoption. That's a meaningful difference. We don't know yet if textbooks will actually change.

Mark

Why did the U.S. vote against it? That seems like an odd position to take on a map.

Mimi

The source doesn't explain the U.S. reasoning. We know they voted no and six others abstained, but the motivations aren't stated in the reporting.

Luke

That's an important gap. Was it political? Technical? Tied to something else? We're left guessing, which means readers might fill in their own story.

Mark

The fourteen-times-larger fact about Africa—is that precise, or is it an approximation?

Mimi

The source states it as fact: Africa is fourteen times larger than Greenland on Equal Earth. That's the actual proportion.

Luke

Though we should note that's comparing Equal Earth to Mercator. On Mercator they appear roughly the same size. The fourteen-times figure is the correction, not a new discovery. The geography was always true; the map was always wrong.

Mark

What about Mercator's original purpose? Was it actually good for navigation?

Mimi

Geographers say it was useful for that specific task—helping sailors plot courses. But Monmonier says outside that narrow application, there's no reason to use it.

Luke

That's worth underlining: Mercator was fit for purpose four hundred years ago. We kept using it long after we stopped needing it for that purpose. That's the real story—not that it was bad, but that we inherited it and never questioned it.

  • For over four hundred years, a cartographer's navigational tool quietly told the world that Greenland and Africa were roughly equal in size — a distortion so normalized it became invisible.
  • African nations and advocacy organizations have pushed back, arguing that shrinking continents near the equator was never neutral — it shaped education, imagination, and the unspoken hierarchies of global perception.
  • The UN General Assembly voted 164-1 to endorse the Equal Earth projection, with only the United States opposing and six nations abstaining, marking a rare near-consensus on a question of geographic representation.
  • The resolution encourages adoption in schools, textbooks, newsrooms, and digital platforms, but stops short of mandating it — leaving the real transformation dependent on whether institutions choose to act.
  • France's foreign minister captured the moment's tension precisely: correcting a distorted map does not change the world, but it is, at minimum, an act of truth.

For centuries, the world has been drawn in ways that quietly shaped how its inhabitants understood power, scale, and significance — not through malice, but through the inherited mathematics of a 16th-century navigator's tool. On Friday, 164 nations of the United Nations General Assembly voted to endorse the Equal Earth projection, a map that renders continents in their true proportions, formally acknowledging that Africa is not the same size as Greenland, but fourteen times larger. The resolution, championed by Togo and African Union members, does not mandate change — it invites it, placing the question of geographic truth before schools, publishers, and the digital platforms that now carry the world's image to billions.

On Friday, the United Nations General Assembly voted to endorse the Equal Earth projection — a map that shows continents in their actual proportions — with 164 member states in favor and only the United States opposed. The resolution, sponsored by Togo and backed by African Union members, represents the culmination of a long campaign to correct what advocates describe as centuries of geographic misrepresentation.

The map it challenges is the Mercator projection, designed in the 16th century to help European sailors navigate open oceans. For over four hundred years, it became the default in classrooms, atlases, and newsrooms worldwide. Its fundamental flaw: it enlarges landmasses near the poles — making Greenland, North America, and northern Europe appear far larger than they are — while shrinking regions near the equator. On a Mercator map, Africa and Greenland look roughly the same size. In reality, Africa is fourteen times larger. Geographers have long understood this distortion, yet it persisted, quietly shaping how billions of people perceived the relative scale and importance of the world's continents.

The Equal Earth projection, finalized in 2018, follows the Earth's curvature and renders landmasses in true proportion. The difference is not subtle. Togo's Foreign Minister Robert Dussey framed the vote in terms beyond cartography: maps, he told the assembly, shape education, nourish imagination, and influence collective perception. Advocates called for accurate maps across schools, textbooks, newsrooms, and the digital platforms where most people now encounter geography.

The resolution encourages adoption — it does not require it. Governments and institutions remain free to choose. France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot offered perhaps the most honest measure of what was achieved: changing the map does not change the world, but correcting a representation that distorts it is already an act of truth. Whether that act translates into the maps people actually see and learn from remains, for now, an open question.

On Friday, the United Nations General Assembly voted to endorse a different way of drawing the world. The Equal Earth projection, a map that shows continents in their actual proportions, received backing from 164 member states. Only the United States voted against it. Six others—Serbia, Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, and Ukraine—abstained. The resolution, sponsored by Togo and supported by African Union members, marks the culmination of a campaign by African nations and advocacy organizations to correct what they see as centuries of geographic misrepresentation.

The map being replaced is the Mercator projection, designed in the 16th century by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator to aid European navigators crossing the ocean. For over four hundred years, it has been the standard in classrooms, atlases, and newsrooms across much of the world. But the Mercator projection carries a fundamental distortion: it enlarges landmasses near the poles—Greenland, North America, and northern Europe appear far larger than they actually are—while shrinking regions near the equator. On a Mercator map, Africa and Greenland appear roughly the same size. In reality, Africa is fourteen times larger.

Geographers have long understood this limitation. Mark Monmonier, a professor of geography at Syracuse University, notes that outside its original narrow purpose—helping sailors navigate by sea—the Mercator projection has no practical value. Yet it persisted, shaping how billions of people understood the relative size and importance of continents. The distortion was not accidental; it was built into the mathematics of the projection itself, a consequence of translating a sphere onto a flat surface.

The Equal Earth projection, finalized in 2018, takes a different approach. It follows the Earth's curvature and renders continents in their true proportions, eliminating the systematic enlargement of polar regions. The difference is not subtle. Where Mercator made Greenland loom large, Equal Earth shows it at its actual scale. Where Mercator diminished Africa, Equal Earth restores it.

Togo's Foreign Minister Robert Dussey framed the vote in terms that went beyond cartography. "Maps shape our understanding of the world," he said before the assembly. "They guide education, nourish the imagination, and influence collective perceptions." The statement captures what advocates see at stake: not merely technical accuracy, but the formation of how people think about geography and global relationships. Africa Filter, one of the leading organizations behind the campaign, called for accurate maps in schools, textbooks, newsrooms, businesses, and the digital platforms where billions encounter geography daily.

The resolution does not ban the Mercator projection or mandate its replacement. It encourages—a softer word than requires. Governments and institutions around the world are invited to adopt Equal Earth, but the choice remains theirs. France's Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot captured the symbolic weight of even this non-binding endorsement: "Changing the map obviously doesn't change the world. But correcting a representation that distorts it is already an act of truth."

What happens next depends on whether schools, publishers, and digital platforms act on the encouragement. The vote itself is a statement—a formal acknowledgment that the way the world has been drawn for centuries was wrong, and that accuracy matters. Whether that statement translates into the actual maps people see and learn from remains an open question.

Maps shape our understanding of the world. They guide education, nourish the imagination, and influence collective perceptions.
— Robert Dussey, Togo's Foreign Minister
Correcting a representation that distorts the world is already an act of truth.
— Jean-Noël Barrot, France's Foreign Minister
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em CBS News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ