Trump and Musk derail U.S. government funding deal, threatening shutdown

A government shutdown would disrupt services for veterans, Social Security beneficiaries, and families during the holiday period.
A deal is a deal. Republicans should keep their word.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre's response to the Republican collapse of the spending compromise.

Trump and Musk publicly opposed Johnson's spending compromise, with Musk calling for a shutdown and Trump threatening to oppose any Republican who votes for it. Johnson faces political peril as his speakership depends on Republican votes he can barely afford to lose, while some Republicans suggest Musk himself become Speaker.

  • Government funding expires Friday night; new Congress convenes January 3
  • Spending bill contained over $100 billion in disaster relief and a congressional pay raise
  • Trump previously triggered a 35-day shutdown in 2019 over border wall funding
  • Johnson has held the speakership since October 2023 and can afford to lose very few Republican votes

Trump and Elon Musk have sabotaged House Speaker Mike Johnson's compromise spending bill, threatening a government shutdown and Johnson's leadership position by demanding inclusion of debt ceiling negotiations.

A month before his second term officially begins, Donald Trump has already upended the delicate machinery of Washington. On Wednesday evening, House Speaker Mike Johnson had negotiated what he believed was a workable compromise—a spending bill that would keep the government funded through the new year and spare everyone the political pain of a shutdown during the holidays. By Thursday morning, that deal was in ruins.

The sabotage came swiftly and from multiple angles. Elon Musk, who owns the social media platform X, began posting a barrage of messages attacking Johnson's agreement. The billionaire, whom Trump has tasked with leading a new Department of Government Efficiency, objected to the spending levels in the bill. He called for a government shutdown if Republicans couldn't secure better terms. Johnson had actually texted with Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, another Trump ally, about the package beforehand. He tried to explain the political reality: he needed Democratic votes to pass anything. The message didn't land.

Then Trump and Vice President-elect JD Vance delivered the decisive blow. In a joint post, they attacked the proposal and demanded a new approach—one that would include raising the debt ceiling, an issue lawmakers had hoped to avoid until next year. Trump followed up by threatening to actively oppose the reelection of any Republican who voted for Johnson's bill. To NBC News, Trump declared that abolishing the debt ceiling entirely would be "the smartest" thing Congress could do. "I support it totally," he said.

The spending bill itself contained more than one hundred billion dollars in disaster relief and included a pay raise for lawmakers—the latter detail particularly inflaming Musk, whose entire mandate is to slash government spending. What was supposed to be a relatively routine pre-holiday vote had become a political minefield. Neither the incoming Republican majority nor the Democrats currently controlling the Senate and White House had wanted a confrontation before the break. Now they had one.

Johnson's position has become precarious. His speakership, which he has held since October 2023, depends on Republican votes he can barely afford to lose. Some Republicans, including Utah Senator Mike Lee, have even suggested that Musk himself become Speaker—a proposal that would require changing a rule that has held throughout American history, since the Speaker has always been an elected member of the House. On Thursday morning, Trump told Fox News that Johnson could "easily" remain Speaker if he "acts decisively and with toughness" to eliminate what Trump called Democratic "traps."

The clock is ticking. Government funding expires Friday night. The new Congress convenes on January 3 and must elect a Speaker, a vote that requires a majority of members present. Johnson cannot afford to lose many Republican votes. The White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, issued a statement warning that a shutdown would harm families during the holidays and endanger essential services that veterans and Social Security beneficiaries depend on. She added: "A deal is a deal. Republicans should keep their word."

This is not Trump's first shutdown gambit. Nearly six years ago, he demanded funding for a border wall in another temporary spending bill, triggering the longest government shutdown in American history—thirty-five days. He eventually relented and reopened the government without securing the wall money. Now, with the debt ceiling suddenly on the table and Johnson's leadership hanging by a thread, the question is whether this confrontation will end differently, or whether Washington is about to experience another extended closure, this time during the transition between administrations.

Abolishing the debt ceiling entirely would be the smartest thing Congress could do. I support it totally.
— Donald Trump, to NBC News
A government shutdown would disrupt services for veterans and Social Security beneficiaries and harm families during the holidays.
— Karine Jean-Pierre, White House press secretary
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why did Trump and Musk move against Johnson's deal if it was supposed to be a routine spending bill?

Model

Because it wasn't routine to them. Musk was appointed to cut government spending, and the bill included over a hundred billion in disaster relief plus a pay raise for lawmakers. To him, that looked like exactly what he was supposed to stop. Trump saw an opening to reshape the entire negotiation.

Inventor

But Johnson said he needed Democratic votes. Couldn't Trump see that?

Model

He could. That's partly why he moved against it. By forcing the debt ceiling into the conversation, Trump changed what "winning" means. It's no longer about passing a spending bill—it's about whether Johnson can survive as Speaker at all.

Inventor

Is Johnson actually in danger of losing his job?

Model

Very much so. He can afford to lose almost no Republican votes. Some Republicans are already floating the idea that Musk should be Speaker instead. That's not a serious proposal under current rules, but it shows how fragile Johnson's position is.

Inventor

What happens if the government actually shuts down?

Model

Veterans lose services, Social Security beneficiaries face delays, federal workers don't get paid. It happens right during the holidays, when families are trying to gather. It's the kind of disruption that tends to anger voters across party lines.

Inventor

Has Trump done this before?

Model

Yes. In 2019, he demanded wall funding and triggered a thirty-five-day shutdown—the longest in history. He eventually backed down and reopened the government without getting the money. The question now is whether he's learned something from that, or whether he'll push harder this time.

Contact Us FAQ