Trump, Iran cite progress in talks as Strait of Hormuz closure deepens uncertainty

The eight-week war has killed thousands and displaced populations across Iran, Israel, and Lebanon; hundreds of seafarers remain stranded in the Gulf.
There are some issues on which we insist. They also have red lines.
Iran's chief negotiator acknowledges the fundamental disagreements blocking a nuclear deal as the ceasefire deadline approaches.

In Islamabad, American and Iranian negotiators sit across a table where the distance between three years and twenty is not merely numerical but civilizational — a measure of how differently each nation imagines its future and its sovereignty. A fragile ceasefire, now in its final days, holds together a war that has already killed thousands and stilled the flow of oil through one of the world's most consequential waterways. The Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's energy once moved freely, has become both a bargaining chip and a mirror of how precarious the global order remains when great powers and smaller ones collide over the question of who controls what, and for how long.

  • The ceasefire expires Wednesday, and Trump has made clear that without a long-term deal, American bombs will fall again on Iran — leaving negotiators racing against a clock neither side fully controls.
  • Iran reversed a brief, market-calming reopening of the Strait of Hormuz on Saturday, reasserting naval control and citing ongoing U.S. port blockades as ceasefire violations, plunging oil markets back into volatility.
  • At least two vessels came under fire attempting to transit the strait, India summoned Iran's ambassador after its own ships were attacked, and hundreds of vessels carrying roughly 20,000 seafarers remain stranded in the Gulf.
  • Tehran is treating the strait as both a strategic weapon and a potential revenue source, demanding payment for security and environmental services — a posture that signals Iran intends to extract maximum leverage before any deal is signed.
  • The core nuclear gap — Washington demanding a twenty-year suspension, Tehran offering three to five — remains unbridged, with no new talks scheduled and no framework of understanding yet in place.

The fundamental disagreement in Islamabad last weekend was about time. The United States wanted Iran to suspend all nuclear activity for twenty years. Iran offered three to five. Neither side moved. Iran's chief negotiator, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, acknowledged progress while conceding the distance remained considerable. Trump called the conversations "very good" without elaborating. The ceasefire was set to expire Wednesday, and Trump had made clear that without a deal, bombing would resume.

The war, now eight weeks old, had already killed thousands and spread into Lebanon, where Israeli forces were operating. Its economic wound was the Strait of Hormuz — the narrow passage between Iran and Oman through which one-fifth of the world's oil normally flows. Before the fighting, some 21 million barrels passed through daily. Now, with Iran controlling access and the U.S. enforcing a naval blockade, that flow had nearly stopped.

On Friday, there was a brief reprieve. Iran announced it would temporarily reopen the strait following a separate Israel-Lebanon ceasefire brokered by Washington. Oil prices fell ten percent. Markets surged. Hundreds of waiting vessels prepared to move. Then, on Saturday, Iran reversed course. Tehran reasserted control, citing the ongoing American blockade of Iranian ports as a ceasefire violation. Supreme Leader Khamenei declared Iran's navy ready to inflict "new bitter defeats" on its enemies. Trump called it blackmail, even as he praised the talks.

The reversal brought immediate consequences. At least two vessels were fired upon while attempting to transit the strait. India summoned Iran's ambassador after its own ships were attacked. Iran's security council announced it would charge vessels for security and environmental services — framing the waterway as both a weapon and a revenue stream.

The calculus was not accidental. Trump faced midterm pressure, rising inflation, and sliding approval ratings. A swift end to the war would help him politically. Iran's closure of the strait made that harder, kept energy markets volatile, and handed Tehran leverage: reopen the passage, and perhaps the Americans would soften their nuclear demands. No new talks had been scheduled. The ceasefire was running out. And the strait — one of the world's most critical chokepoints — remained closed, its fate bound to negotiations that showed no sign of breaking the deadlock.

The negotiators sat across from each other in Islamabad last weekend with a fundamental disagreement about time. The United States wanted Iran to suspend all nuclear activity for twenty years. Iran countered with three to five years. Neither side budged. By Saturday morning, as senior national security officials gathered at the White House and Trump headed to his golf club with his Iran envoy Steve Witkoff, the gap between them remained vast—though both sides insisted progress was being made.

Iran's chief negotiator, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, told state media the talks had moved forward but acknowledged the distance was still considerable. "There are some issues on which we insist," he said. "They also have red lines. But these issues could be just one or two." Trump offered little more than a vague endorsement, saying the conversations had been "very good" without elaborating. The ceasefire between the United States, Israel, and Iran was set to expire in four days, on Wednesday. If no agreement emerged by then, Trump had made clear he would resume bombing.

The war itself had become a grinding catastrophe. Eight weeks in, it had killed thousands of people and spread beyond Iran's borders into Lebanon, where Israeli forces were now conducting operations. The conflict had upended global energy markets. The Strait of Hormuz—the narrow waterway between Iran and Oman through which one-fifth of the world's oil normally flows—had become the war's economic fulcrum. Before the fighting, roughly 21 million barrels of oil passed through the strait each day. Now, with Iran controlling access and the United States enforcing a naval blockade, that flow had nearly stopped.

On Friday, there had been a moment of relief. Iran announced it would temporarily reopen the strait following a separate ceasefire agreement between Israel and Lebanon brokered by the Americans. Oil prices fell ten percent. Global stock markets surged. Hundreds of vessels that had been waiting in the Gulf—carrying about 20,000 seafarers—prepared to move. But on Saturday, Iran reversed itself. Tehran reasserted control over the waterway, citing what it called continued American violations of the ceasefire: the ongoing blockade of Iranian ports. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei declared that Iran's navy was prepared to inflict "new bitter defeats" on its enemies. Trump called the move "blackmail," even as he praised the negotiations.

The reversal created immediate chaos. At least two vessels reported coming under fire while attempting to transit the strait on Saturday. India, alarmed that two of its own ships had been attacked, summoned Iran's ambassador in New Delhi to lodge a formal protest. The U.S. Central Command confirmed it was enforcing a maritime blockade but offered no comment on Iran's actions. Iran's Supreme National Security Council said its control of the strait now included the authority to demand payment for security, safety, and environmental protection services—a claim that suggested Tehran was treating the waterway as a revenue source as well as a strategic weapon.

The timing of Iran's move was calculated. Trump faced domestic political pressure. His party held narrow majorities in Congress heading into November midterm elections. Gasoline prices were high. Inflation was rising. His approval ratings were sliding. A quick end to the war would help. But Iran's closure of the strait made that harder. The blockade disrupted global supply chains and kept energy markets volatile. It also gave Tehran leverage in the nuclear talks: reopen the strait, and the Americans might offer better terms.

Iran's deputy foreign minister, Saeed Khatibzadeh, said no date had been set for the next round of negotiations. A framework of understanding had to come first, he said. Trump had suggested on Friday that talks might resume over the weekend, claiming the two sides were "very close to making a deal." But by Saturday, there were no visible signs of preparation for new meetings in Islamabad. The negotiators remained at an impasse, the ceasefire was running out, and the Strait of Hormuz—one of the world's most critical chokepoints—remained closed, its fate tied to nuclear talks that showed no sign of breaking the deadlock.

We have had progress but there is still a big distance between us.
— Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, Iran's chief negotiator
Trump called Iran's closure of the strait 'blackmail' while simultaneously praising the ongoing negotiations.
— President Donald Trump
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does the nuclear question matter so much if the real issue right now is the strait?

Model

Because Iran is using one to negotiate the other. If the US agrees to a shorter suspension period on nuclear work, Iran gets a political win at home. That makes it easier for them to reopen the strait without looking weak. The negotiations are all connected.

Inventor

But Trump said they were very close to a deal. Does that mean anything?

Model

It means he wants to believe it. He's under real pressure—gas prices, elections coming, his approval numbers. Saying you're close keeps markets calm and keeps his base hopeful. But the gap between twenty years and three to five years isn't small. That's a fundamental disagreement about how much Iran can develop.

Inventor

What happens to those 20,000 seafarers if the strait stays closed?

Model

They wait. Some ships have been sitting there for weeks. Crews get exhausted, supplies run low, families worry. It's not dramatic in the news cycle, but it's a real human cost that doesn't get resolved by a press release.

Inventor

Is Iran's demand for payment for "security services" actually new, or is that just a cover story?

Model

Probably both. Iran has always claimed the right to manage the strait. But framing it as a fee for services makes it sound less like extortion and more like a legitimate cost. It's a way to save face while extracting money from ships that want to pass through.

Inventor

What does Trump threatening to "drop bombs again" actually accomplish?

Model

It sets a deadline. Wednesday. It tells Iran that if they don't move, the war restarts. But it also tells the markets that volatility is coming either way—either a deal or more fighting. Neither scenario is stable.

Want the full story? Read the original at CNA ↗
Contact Us FAQ