Each year, the Philippines' promise of free higher education collides with a quieter failure: the money runs out before the mission is complete. On September 24th, inside the House of Representatives, Appropriations Chair Mikaela Suansing stood before education and budget officials and named the cycle for what it is — a structural problem, not a seasonal inconvenience. With 12.3 billion pesos allocated yet deficiencies persisting, she pledged to trace the gap between what planners project and what campuses actually experience, so that the students who most need the system can finally rely on i
Suansing pledges to fix recurring free higher education funding gaps
I do not want us to keep scrambling every year
So the government allocated 12.3 billion pesos for free higher education, and there are still funding gaps. How does that happen?
The money gets split between different sources and different institutions, and the formula that divides it up is based on projected enrollment numbers. When actual enrollment differs from the projection, some schools end up short.
But we should be clear—the source doesn't specify how large the current deficiency is. We know gaps exist and that they recur, but the exact amount owed right now isn't stated.
And Suansing is saying the real problem is the formula itself, not just the amount of money?
Exactly. She's saying the formula assumes certain enrollment patterns that don't match reality. Some universities enroll fewer students than expected, others more, and the system doesn't adjust.
Right, but the source doesn't give us examples of which universities are over or under, or by how much. We're working from her diagnosis, not from detailed data.
What's the actual commitment here? Is she promising to fix it, or to study it?
She's promising to work with education and budget officials to identify the root causes and address them. She wants to prevent the annual cycle where universities have to ask for emergency funding.
That's a commitment to process, not to outcome. She's saying the House will work on it, but there's no timeline, no specific mechanism, no guarantee of success.
Fair point. But the fact that she's framing this as a formula problem rather than a money problem—that's significant, right?
It is. It suggests the solution might not just be allocating more money, but redesigning how the money gets distributed based on actual institutional needs.
Which is harder and takes longer. And we don't know yet if the House leadership actually has the political will to do that work, or if this is a public commitment that gets quietly shelved.
The Pulse
- Year after year, state universities return to Congress with the same emergency: the free higher education fund has run dry before the academic year ends.
- A formal compliance meeting — convened specifically to address money still owed to institutions serving the country's poorest students — laid bare just how routine the crisis has become.
- The suspected culprit is a broken formula: enrollment projections that don't match reality leave some schools underfunded and the entire system perpetually off-balance.
- Suansing, a former government scholar herself, is pushing CHED, DBM, and university associations to jointly redesign the funding model before the 2027 national budget is finalized.
- House leadership — Speaker Dy, Majority Leader Marcos, and Suansing — have aligned behind the effort, giving the reform push rare institutional momentum at exactly the right budgetary moment.
Each year, the Philippines' promise of free higher education collides with a quieter failure: the money runs out before the mission is complete. On September 24th, inside the House of Representatives, Appropriations Chair Mikaela Suansing stood before education and budget officials and named the cycle for what it is — a structural problem, not a seasonal inconvenience. With 12.3 billion pesos allocated yet deficiencies persisting, she pledged to trace the gap between what planners project and what campuses actually experience, so that the students who most need the system can finally rely on it.
Inside the House of Representatives on September 24th, officials gathered for a meeting with an unusually candid title: the Affirmation of Compliance and Commitment to Settle the Free Higher Education Deficiency. The name alone confirmed what participants already knew — the Philippines' free higher education program has a recurring funding problem, and this year was no different.
The government committed 12.3 billion pesos to support state universities and colleges: 7.8 billion from the Higher Education Development Fund and 4.49 billion from the General Appropriations Act. Yet gaps remain, and institutions that educate the country's least privileged students are still owed money. Appropriations Chair Mikaela Suansing, representing Nueva Ecija's 1st district, made clear she intends to break the cycle rather than simply patch it again.
Her diagnosis pointed to a fundamental mismatch between planning and reality. The formula used to distribute funds relies on enrollment projections that frequently diverge from actual figures — some universities enroll more students than anticipated, others fewer, and the system has no mechanism to correct course mid-stream. The result is an annual scramble that exhausts administrators and leaves universities unable to budget with confidence.
Suansing brought uncommon personal conviction to the pledge. As a former government scholar herself, she credited public education with shaping her own trajectory. She was not reciting policy — she was speaking from inside the experience of the very institutions now struggling to stay solvent.
With the 7.2-trillion-peso national budget for 2027 currently being defended in the House plenary, the timing is consequential. Suansing committed to working with CHED, DBM, and university associations to build a funding model responsive to actual enrollment rather than projections. Whether that commitment produces a durable fix — or becomes another promise absorbed into the same annual cycle — is the question the coming budget season will begin to answer.
On Thursday, September 24th, inside the House of Representatives, government officials gathered to confront a problem that has become routine: the Philippines' free higher education program runs short of money every year. Mikaela Angela Suansing, who chairs the House Committee on Appropriations and represents Nueva Ecija's 1st district, stood before them and made a straightforward promise—that this cycle would not continue unchanged.
The immediate numbers tell part of the story. For the current year, the government has allocated 12.3 billion pesos to support state universities and colleges through its free higher education initiative. That sum breaks down into 7.8 billion pesos drawn from the Higher Education Development Fund, supplemented by 4.49 billion pesos from the General Appropriations Act. Yet even with that commitment, funding gaps persist. The meeting itself—formally titled the Affirmation of Compliance and Commitment to Settle the Free Higher Education Deficiency—was convened specifically to address money that remains owed to the institutions that educate the country's poorest students.
Suansing's pledge went beyond simply closing this year's hole. She committed to working with the Commission on Higher Education, the Department of Budget and Management, the Philippine Association of State Universities and Colleges, and the universities themselves to understand why the gaps keep appearing. The root cause, she suggested, may lie in a fundamental mismatch between what planners expect and what actually happens on campus. "There is a discrepancy between the estimates and the actual enrollment and utilization of different universities," she said. In other words, the formula that determines how much money each institution receives may be built on projections that do not match reality—some schools enroll fewer students than anticipated, others more, and the funding system has no mechanism to adjust.
The frustration in her language was plain. "I do not want us to keep scrambling every year because there is a deficiency and we need to bridge it for the following year," she said, speaking in a mix of English and Filipino. Year after year, the same institutions return asking for emergency money to cover shortfalls. Year after year, the House appropriates additional funds as a patch. The cycle exhausts everyone involved and leaves universities unable to plan with confidence.
Suansing brought personal weight to the commitment. She herself had been a government scholar, educated by the public system she now helps fund. "The foundation that I got from our government education institutions is what propelled me forward," she said. That experience, she made clear, shaped her conviction that the system deserves serious investment and serious repair. She was not speaking as an administrator checking a box; she was speaking as someone who had moved through the very institutions now struggling to function.
The House leadership—Speaker Bojie Dy, Majority Leader Sandro Marcos, and Suansing herself—committed to working together to identify and address what is driving the deficiencies. The appropriations panel is currently defending the 7.2-trillion-peso national budget for 2027 in the House plenary, which means the conversation about higher education funding is happening now, in real time, as the next year's allocations take shape.
What remains to be seen is whether the diagnosis of the problem—the gap between projected and actual enrollment—will yield a durable fix. Suansing promised that the House would work to ensure that higher education funding becomes responsive to actual needs rather than estimates. If that commitment holds, the universities and the students they serve may finally move beyond the annual scramble for money that should have been there from the start.
Notable Quotes
There is a discrepancy between the estimates and the actual enrollment and utilization of different universities.— Rep. Mikaela Angela Suansing
The foundation that I got from our government education institutions is what propelled me forward.— Rep. Mikaela Angela Suansing