SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic lead 'most robust' IPO pipeline in a decade

A solution in search of a problem
Stripe's founder on why the fintech giant is staying private despite favorable IPO conditions.

SpaceX's $80B IPO on June 12 would be the largest in history, valued at 105x sales, leveraging AI infrastructure and lunar ambitions beyond traditional aerospace. AI dominance drives investor appetite: OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs signal structural market shift toward language models and computational infrastructure rather than cyclical economic factors.

  • SpaceX IPO scheduled June 12, targeting $80 billion, valued at 105x 2025 sales
  • OpenAI seeking $60 billion raise, $730 billion–$1 trillion valuation, IPO fall 2026
  • Anthropic targeting October IPO, $30 billion raise, $900 billion valuation
  • Inspire Brands (Dunkin', Buffalo Wild Wings) seeking $20 billion valuation with 33,300 restaurants
  • Historically, top 10 IPOs by initial cap fell median 31% in first year

2026 marks the strongest IPO market in a decade, led by SpaceX ($80B), OpenAI ($60B), and Anthropic ($30B), alongside restaurant group Inspire Brands and fintech Stripe, reshaping capital markets.

The IPO market is waking up after years of hibernation, and the companies leading the charge are not your typical Wall Street debutantes. SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic—three firms built on artificial intelligence, rockets, and the infrastructure to power both—are preparing to reshape how capital flows through the global economy in 2026. Alongside them sit Inspire Brands, which owns Dunkin' Donuts and Buffalo Wild Wings, and a handful of other tech firms that have been waiting in the wings for conditions to shift. The moment has arrived, and the numbers are staggering.

SpaceX filed its preliminary prospectus this week with ambitions to raise $80 billion, valuing Elon Musk's aerospace company between $1.75 and $2 trillion. The scale is almost incomprehensible: traders at Bankinter note the company would be valued at 105 times its 2025 sales of $18.7 billion. The IPO is scheduled for June 12 under the ticker "SPCX," a date chosen with deliberate symbolism—it falls just before Musk's 55th birthday on June 28, coinciding with America's 250th anniversary and an unusual planetary alignment between Venus and Jupiter. The prospectus itself reads like a manifesto for human expansion beyond Earth. Musk writes of wanting to wake each morning believing the future will be extraordinary, of building a spacefaring civilization, of imagining nothing more thrilling than venturing among the stars. SpaceX's ambitions extend to lunar transport, Mars operations, and beyond—ventures that could reshape terrestrial industries and create trillion-dollar markets in space. The company's Starlink division, with over 10 million subscribers, already generates 70 percent of annual revenue. In January, SpaceX acquired the AI startup xAI, further cementing its position at the intersection of space exploration and artificial intelligence infrastructure.

OpenAI, creator of ChatGPT, is preparing its own debut between September and year-end, targeting $60 billion in capital and a valuation between $730 billion and $1 trillion. The company, led by Sam Altman and advised by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, has been signing billion-dollar contracts with AMD, Oracle, and the Pentagon to boost revenues before going public. Anthropic, maker of the Claude AI model and backed by Google, Amazon, and Microsoft, is aiming for October with a $30 billion raise and a $900 billion valuation. Together, these three AI firms could mobilize tens of billions of dollars in a period of significant economic uncertainty.

The catalyst driving this surge is not temporary or cyclical—it is structural. Artificial intelligence has become the dominant investment theme globally, triggering an industrial race for energy infrastructure, computing power, semiconductors, and language models without parallel. João Queiroz, head of trading at Banco Carregosa, calls this year's IPO pipeline "without exaggeration, the most robust in the last decade." He describes three concentric circles: a core of SpaceX, Anthropic, and OpenAI, followed by a second ring including Databricks and Stripe. The timing is no accident. Investment banks on Wall Street are clearly capitalizing on a favorable market window. Henrique Tomé, analyst at XTB, notes that when Alibaba went public in 2014 for $22 billion, AI and commercial space exploration were not even valuation criteria. Today, they are precisely the two themes capturing investor appetite most intensely. SpaceX possesses both, giving it a long-term narrative without equivalent among publicly traded companies.

Inspire Brands, the restaurant holding company, submitted a confidential IPO request on May 8, seeking a $20 billion valuation. With more than 33,300 restaurants worldwide and annual revenue of $33.4 billion, the offering could rank among the largest ever in the food service sector. Databricks, a Silicon Valley cloud data platform valued at $134 billion after raising $5 billion in February, is also in the pipeline, though some analysts question whether going public serves its interests when it can grow without quarterly disclosure obligations. Stripe, the fintech giant valued at $159 billion after a secondary share sale, has cooled on near-term IPO plans. Cofounder John Collison told CNBC in February that an IPO would be "a solution in search of a problem" when the company is self-sustaining and growing rapidly.

Queiroz identifies four reasons the IPO market has shifted from years of inertia. First is the gravitational pull of AI itself. Second is volatility normalization—the VIX ended 2025 around 15 points, enabling rigorous pricing and deliberate planning. Third is the maturation of private tech unicorns: companies with combined valuations exceeding $3.6 trillion are pressing for liquidity as venture funds from 2017-2020 approach the end of their investment horizons and employees have waited too long for returns. Fourth is regulatory environment. Paul Atkins at the SEC has signaled a more permissive stance toward capital formation, with moves to lighten disclosure requirements for emerging growth companies, reducing admission costs and shortening procedural timelines.

Yet beneath this enthusiasm lies a concentration of risk few discuss candidly. Historically, the ten largest IPOs by initial capitalization have fallen a median of 31 percent in their first year, and most have underperformed the S&P 500 since debut. Moments of market exuberance typically coincide with late-cycle phases, not their beginnings. SpaceX and its peers are not typical IPO candidates, and their performance should not be mistaken for a signal about the broader market. The window is open, the capital is ready, and the vision is audacious. What happens when these companies meet the demands of public shareholders remains to be seen.

The IPO pipeline for this year is, without exaggeration, the most robust in the last decade.
— João Queiroz, head of trading, Banco Carregosa
An IPO would be a solution in search of a problem. We have a self-sustaining business growing very well, with many new products we want to create, so we don't need extra capital right now.
— John Collison, cofounder and president, Stripe
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does SpaceX's valuation feel so different from Alibaba's in 2014, even though both are historic IPOs?

Model

Because in 2014, the market didn't know what to do with space exploration. It was interesting, but not central to how capital flows. Now, SpaceX isn't just a rocket company—it's an AI infrastructure play. Starlink is already generating 70 percent of revenue. The company bought xAI. Musk is talking about terawatt-scale AI computing in space. Investors are paying for a narrative that touches both the two hottest themes simultaneously.

Inventor

So the AI boom is doing the heavy lifting here?

Model

It's the primary catalyst, yes. But it's not just hype. There's a real industrial race for computing power, semiconductors, energy infrastructure. OpenAI and Anthropic are signing billion-dollar contracts with major tech firms and the Pentagon. These aren't speculative bets—they're infrastructure plays with revenue backing them.

Inventor

What about Inspire Brands? Donuts and chicken wings seem disconnected from this AI story.

Model

They are. Inspire Brands is the outlier in this pipeline. It's a mature, profitable business with 33,000 restaurants globally. The IPO would be one of the largest in food service history. It's riding a different wave—private equity maturation, accumulated unicorns needing liquidity—not the AI boom.

Inventor

You mentioned risk concentration. What does that mean practically?

Model

Historically, when the ten biggest IPOs by market cap debut, they fall a median of 31 percent in year one. Most underperform the broader market afterward. We're in a moment of exuberance, and exuberance typically peaks late in a cycle, not early. The market is paying historic premiums for companies positioned at the center of the next transformation. That's how it always looks before it doesn't.

Inventor

Why is Stripe not rushing to go public if conditions are so favorable?

Model

Because Stripe doesn't need the capital. The company is self-sustaining, growing rapidly, and valued at $159 billion. Going public would mean quarterly earnings calls, disclosure obligations, shareholder pressure. The founder said an IPO would be a solution in search of a problem. Sometimes the best move is to stay private.

Inventor

What changes if even one of these—say OpenAI—stumbles after going public?

Model

It would shatter the narrative. Right now, investors are pricing in a future where AI transforms everything. If OpenAI's growth slows, or if the infrastructure costs prove unsustainable, the entire pipeline could cool. The SEC's more permissive stance helps, but it doesn't change market psychology. One crack in the foundation could reset the whole cycle.

Want the full story? Read the original at ECO ↗
Contact Us FAQ