In a debate that reaches back to the old question of how much power a state should give its police, members of the Oireachtas have begun testing the Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2021 against the constitutional foundations of Irish justice. The bill would widen Garda authority to stop and search for possession, to approve their own search warrants in urgent cases, and to remove legal counsel judged disruptive. Critics argue that these powers would shift the balance away from independent judges and away from the right to be represented, while the one provision that would bring new light, the rec
Serious concerns raised over Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2021, including search warrant and counsel-exclusion powers
No information at all on who is stopped and searched
Mark
Why did this bill get such a sharp reception at the Justice Committee?
Mimi
Because it touches three sensitive points at once: stop and search for possession, who signs off on search warrants, and whether Gardaí can exclude legal counsel they see as disruptive.
Mark
What's the objection to the warrant change?
Mimi
Currently a Garda applies to the District Court. Patrick Costello said he was deeply concerned about urgent-circumstance warrants and that real independence would need an external body issuing them.
Luke
Worth saying the constitutional concern is what critics describe. The reporting doesn't include a legal ruling that the provision is unconstitutional.
Mark
And the counsel provision?
Mimi
Barry Ward called interference with representation at questioning total anathema to the current system. The bill lets Gardaí remove counsel they believe would disrupt an investigation.
Luke
The article doesn't say how disruption would be defined or who would review that call. That's a gap.
Mark
The ethnicity recording seems to be viewed more favourably.
Mimi
Yes. Bob Collins said there's currently no data on those stopped and searched. Clare Daly said it matters because police forces everywhere have been found responsible for racial profiling.
Luke
Collins was speculating that Ireland isn't an outlier. Nobody has data showing what the pattern is here, which is his point. And he still flagged areas of concern in the bill.
Le Pouls
- Gardaí could soon sign off on their own search warrants in urgent situations, a change that TDs say sits uneasily with the constitutional order.
- Fine Gael Senator Barry Ward warns that removing a person's counsel at questioning strikes at the heart of the right to representation.
- Ireland currently records no data on who is stopped and searched, leaving the Policing Authority and critics working in the dark.
- Clare Daly points to racial profiling findings in police forces worldwide, while Bob Collins says concerns remain even as the ethnicity recording is welcomed.
- The bill remains at committee, and its fate depends on whether the warrant and counsel powers are revised and whether the data provision survives.
In a debate that reaches back to the old question of how much power a state should give its police, members of the Oireachtas have begun testing the Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2021 against the constitutional foundations of Irish justice. The bill would widen Garda authority to stop and search for possession, to approve their own search warrants in urgent cases, and to remove legal counsel judged disruptive. Critics argue that these powers would shift the balance away from independent judges and away from the right to be represented, while the one provision that would bring new light, the recording of ethnicity, age and gender during stops, stands as the measure most likely to reveal what has long gone unseen.
At the Oireachtas Justice Committee, the Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2021 has drawn pointed questions from TDs and senators who say parts of it sit uneasily with the constitutional footing of the current system. The bill would expand three kinds of Garda power: stopping and searching people for possession, signing off on search warrants, and excluding legal counsel considered disruptive.
The warrant provision drew the sharpest criticism. Today a Garda seeking a warrant applies to the District Court. Under the bill, Gardaí could issue warrants themselves in urgent circumstances. Green Party TD Patrick Costello said he was deeply concerned, arguing that a warrant can only be truly independent if an external body issues it.
The counsel provision prompted equally strong words. Fine Gael Senator Barry Ward said that interfering with a person's right to legal representation at questioning was anathema to the system as it now stands.
The stop-and-search section was received differently. The bill would require Gardaí to record the ethnicity, age and gender of those they search. Policing Authority chair Bob Collins noted that there is currently no information at all on the extent of stop and search or on who is stopped. Independent MEP Clare Daly stressed that police forces around the world have been found responsible for racial profiling, though Collins said the bill still has areas of concern.
The bill remains under discussion at committee. The points to watch are whether the warrant and counsel provisions change in response to constitutional objections, and whether the new data recording survives, since it would offer the first real picture of who is being stopped and searched.
At the Oireachtas Justice Committee, the Garda Síochána (Powers) Bill 2021 drew pointed questions from TDs and senators who said parts of it sit uneasily with the constitutional footing of the current system. The bill would widen what Gardaí can do in three areas: stopping and searching people for possession, signing off on search warrants, and excluding legal counsel they judge to be disruptive.
The warrant provision drew some of the sharpest criticism. Under existing law, a Garda who wants a search warrant applies for it through the District Court. The bill would let Gardaí themselves sign off on warrants in urgent circumstances. Green Party TD Patrick Costello, quoted by the Irish Examiner, said he was deeply concerned about the search warrant in urgent circumstances. For a warrant to be truly independent, he argued, it would have to be issued by an external body.
The counsel provision prompted equally strong words. The bill would allow Gardaí to remove any legal counsel they believe would disrupt an investigation. Fine Gael Senator Barry Ward, speaking on RTE, said that interfering with a person's right to be represented by legal counsel at the point of questioning was total anathema to the system as it now stands.
The stop-and-search section was received differently. The bill would require Gardaí to record the ethnicity, age and gender of people they stop and search. Bob Collins, chair of the Policing Authority, told RTE that at present there is no information at all on the nature of stop and search: its extent, or the age, gender and ethnic indicators of those stopped. He said it would be naive, even self-delusional, to think Ireland was a complete outlier, or that those stopped precisely mirrored the make-up of the whole population.
Independent MEP Clare Daly said this part of the bill mattered because every police force on the planet has been found guilty or responsible of racial profiling. Even so, Collins said the bill still has areas of concern.
The bill is still being discussed at committee. The points to watch are whether the warrant and counsel-exclusion provisions change in response to the constitutional objections, and whether the new data recording survives, since it would supply the first picture of who is being stopped and searched.
Citations marquantes
Interfering with a person's right to be represented by legal counsel at questioning is total anathema to the current system.— Senator Barry Ward (Fine Gael), on RTE
He was deeply concerned about the urgent-circumstances search warrant, and said a truly independent warrant would need an external issuing body.— Patrick Costello TD (Green Party), quoted by the Irish Examiner
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Buzz.ie ↗
Politics & Governance