Scientists unlock Mount Etna's volcanic plumbing, revealing why eruptions vary from weeks to hours

Magma raced upward in hours, while other magma lingered for weeks
Two ancient Mount Etna eruptions revealed opposite behaviors, driven by different concentrations of volcanic gases.
Mark

So these two eruptions at Etna—one took weeks, one took hours. What actually changed between them?

Mimi

The magma came from different depths and had different amounts of carbon dioxide. The fast one had much more CO2, which basically supercharged it upward from the deep mantle.

Luke

But how confident are we in those depth measurements? Are we reading the gas bubbles correctly?

Mimi

The Raman spectroscopy technique measures the density of CO2 trapped in crystals. From density you calculate pressure, from pressure you get depth. It's a chain of inference, but it's been validated.

Mark

And the slow eruption—it just sat there for weeks at 2 to 5 kilometers down?

Mimi

Yes. The magma stalled in a shallow chamber and released gas gradually before finally erupting. Water vapor was the dominant gas in that case.

Luke

Do we know why it stalled? Is that something the gas composition explains, or is there something else about the plumbing?

Mimi

The gas composition seems to be the main driver. Higher water means slower, shallower processes. Higher CO2 means rapid ascent from depth.

Mark

So if you're monitoring a volcano today and you detect high CO2, you'd expect a fast, dangerous eruption?

Luke

That's the theory, but we're working from two ancient eruptions at one volcano. The technique is new. We don't yet have real-time data from an active volcano to test whether this actually predicts what happens next.

Mimi

True. But that's exactly why they're studying volcanoes in Chile and Hawaii now—to see if the pattern holds elsewhere.

Mark

And if it does?

Mimi

Then we can start building better risk models. We'd know not just that an eruption is coming, but roughly how fast and from how deep.

  • Two ancient Etna eruptions — one from 122 B.C., another nearly 4,000 years old — behaved so differently that they might as well have come from two separate volcanoes, forcing scientists to rethink their models entirely.
  • The 122 B.C. magma stalled for weeks just kilometers below the surface, quietly degassing before finally unleashing one of Etna's most violent recorded eruptions, while the older event raced from 30 kilometers deep to the surface in mere hours.
  • The culprit behind this dramatic difference is the ratio of two competing gases: carbon dioxide, which drives rapid deep ascent, and water vapor, which slows the process and anchors magma at shallower depths.
  • Using Raman spectroscopy to read microscopic gas bubbles trapped in ancient crystals, researchers can now reconstruct a volcano's internal plumbing with a precision previously unimaginable.
  • The technique is already being deployed at volcanoes in Chile, Hawaii, and beyond, with the long-term ambition of mapping magma pathways beneath every major volcano on Earth to sharpen eruption risk forecasts.

Beneath the ancient slopes of Mount Etna, magma does not follow a single path to the surface — it chooses, in a sense, between patience and urgency. Cornell researchers have discovered that the invisible gases locked within rising rock, particularly the balance between carbon dioxide and water vapor, determine whether an eruption unfolds over weeks or within hours. This finding, drawn from crystals formed in eruptions thousands of years apart, invites us to reconsider what we thought we understood about the deep forces that shape volcanic violence — and how much of the Earth's inner life remains to be read.

Mount Etna has not always erupted the same way. Some of its magma has crept upward for weeks, stalling near the surface before finally breaking through. Other magma has surged from nearly 30 kilometers deep to the surface in a matter of hours. A Cornell University team led by Esteban Gazel has now uncovered why — and the answer is written in gases too small to see.

The researchers used Raman spectroscopy to analyze microscopic bubbles of carbon dioxide and water vapor preserved inside crystals from ancient magma. These bubbles, far thinner than a human hair, record the pressure and depth at which they formed. By converting gas density into pressure, and pressure into depth, the team could reconstruct the hidden journeys magma took before erupting.

They focused on two eruptions. The 122 B.C. event — one of Etna's most violent on record — saw magma rise from about 22 kilometers down, only to stall at 2 to 5 kilometers for several weeks before finally erupting. The second event, the Fall Stratified eruption from roughly 4,000 years ago, began even deeper, between 24 and 30 kilometers, yet reached the surface within hours. The difference came down to gas: the rapid eruption was rich in carbon dioxide, while the slow one was dominated by water vapor.

This reframes a long-held assumption. For decades, water was considered the primary driver of volcanic explosiveness. Gazel's group had already shown in 2023 that CO2 plays an equally critical role; this new work reveals how the competition between the two gases shapes an eruption's entire character. Etna, sitting at a rare geological crossroads where both gases matter, proved an ideal place to observe this dynamic.

The team is now applying the same technique to volcanoes in Chile, Hawaii, and elsewhere, with the ambitious goal of eventually mapping magma plumbing systems worldwide. Better maps of where magma originates and how fast it moves could meaningfully improve the risk models that governments rely on when preparing communities for eruptions. The research was published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, led by former postdoctoral researcher Maxim Gavrilenko and supported by the National Science Foundation.

Mount Etna has erupted in radically different ways across its history. Some of its magma has crept upward slowly, stalling near the surface for weeks before finally breaking through. Other magma has raced from depths of nearly 30 kilometers straight to the surface in just hours. A team of researchers led by Esteban Gazel at Cornell University has now figured out why—and the answer lies in the invisible gases trapped inside the rock.

The team used a technique called Raman spectroscopy to examine microscopic gas bubbles preserved in crystals that formed inside ancient magma. These bubbles, only 1 to 10 percent the thickness of a human hair, hold a record of the pressure and depth at which they formed. By measuring the density of carbon dioxide and water vapor in these trapped pockets, the researchers could work backward to determine where the magma started its journey and how fast it moved. The method is straightforward in principle but requires extraordinary precision: transform gas density into pressure, pressure into depth, and depth into a map of the volcano's internal plumbing.

The researchers focused on two eruptions from Mount Etna's past. The first occurred in 122 B.C. and was among the volcano's most violent on record—a Plinian eruption, named after Pliny the Elder's account of Mount Vesuvius in 79 A.D. When the team reconstructed this event using their new technique, they found that magma began rising from about 22 kilometers below the surface. But instead of shooting straight up, it slowed dramatically. The magma stalled at a shallow depth of 2 to 5 kilometers and sat there for several weeks, gradually releasing gas, before the eruption finally occurred.

The second eruption they studied, known as the Fall Stratified event and dating to nearly 4,000 years ago, followed an entirely different script. Magma rose from 24 to 30 kilometers deep—even deeper than the 122 B.C. event—but it did not linger. It raced upward and erupted within hours. The key difference the researchers identified was the concentration of carbon dioxide. The rapid eruption was driven by much higher levels of CO2, while the slower, weeks-long ascent was dominated by water vapor.

This finding reframes how scientists think about volcanic explosiveness. For decades, researchers assumed water was the primary gas responsible for driving eruptions. Gazel's group showed in 2023 that carbon dioxide plays an equally important role, and this new work reveals how the balance between the two gases shapes the entire character of an eruption. When carbon dioxide reaches a certain threshold, it can push magma upward from great depths at remarkable speed. When water becomes the dominant volatile, the process unfolds more slowly, with magma stalling at shallower levels where it has time to degas gradually.

Mount Etna, Gazel noted, is one of the few volcanoes on Earth where these two gases compete for control. Some volcanoes are dominated almost entirely by CO2, typically those on oceanic islands. Others, like those in subduction zones where oceanic plates collide with continental crust, are controlled primarily by water. Etna sits in a rare middle ground where both gases matter, making it an ideal natural laboratory for understanding how their interplay shapes eruptions.

The implications extend far beyond Etna. Gazel's team is now applying the same Raman spectroscopy technique to volcanoes in Chile, Hawaii, and other regions around the world. The goal is ambitious: to eventually map the magma plumbing systems of every major volcano on the planet. If scientists can determine where magma begins its ascent, how quickly it moves, and which gases are driving that movement, they can build far more realistic models of how dangerous eruptions unfold. Those models form the foundation of volcanic risk assessment—the calculations that help governments and communities prepare for and respond to eruptions. The research was published in Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, with former postdoctoral researcher Maxim Gavrilenko as the lead author. The work was supported by the National Science Foundation.

Volcanoes work like a shaken soda bottle—the bubbles separate fast and you have an explosion. My lab is trying to quantify these processes.
— Esteban Gazel, Cornell University
At a certain threshold of CO2, the eruption will come from very deep and really fast, but when you have a higher threshold of water, then the process is controlled at shallow levels.
— Esteban Gazel, Cornell University
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Science Daily ↗
Nous contacter FAQ