MIT Physicist Probes Neutrinos to Unlock Universe's Fundamental Mysteries

I felt like my collaborators trusted me, and I had something of value to give.
Reyes reflects on developing automation software that transformed her role from routine detector work to leadership within the international collaboration.
Mark

So Reyes started out studying physics without really understanding why it mattered, and then a teacher changed that. How common is that origin story in physics?

Mimi

Very common. A lot of people in STEM talk about a mentor who made the difference. What's interesting about Reyes is that she's now doing that for undergraduates at MIT—she's a tutor and teaching assistant. She's passing it forward.

Luke

Right, but the article doesn't tell us much about that teaching work. How many students does she work with? What does she actually do? We get the origin story, but the current mentoring role is mentioned in one sentence.

Mimi

Fair point. But the broader arc is that she's someone who understands how important that connection is, so she's trying to create it for others.

Mark

Let's talk about the actual research. Neutrinos are hard to detect because they barely interact with matter. Why does that make them valuable for understanding physics beyond the Standard Model?

Mimi

Because they're so elusive, they can reveal things that other particles can't. The Standard Model works really well for most of what we observe, but it's incomplete. Neutrinos behave in ways the Standard Model doesn't fully explain, so studying them might point toward new physics.

Luke

The article says the Standard Model is "extremely accurate" but "not complete." That's a bit vague. What specifically does the Standard Model fail to explain about neutrinos?

Mimi

The article doesn't go into that detail. It just says Ricochet is studying coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering to investigate properties of neutrinos. The implication is that understanding these interactions better will help fill gaps in the model.

Mark

Reyes developed automation software for the detectors. That sounds like a significant technical contribution. How much of her PhD work is that?

Mimi

It became a major part of her development as a physicist. She went from doing routine detector work to building tools that other scientists use. It gave her credibility within the collaboration.

Luke

But we don't know the scope. Is this software used by five people or fifty? Is it a core tool or a helpful utility? The article says it was "important" to her development, but we don't have a clear sense of its impact on the experiment itself.

Mark

She spent nine months in France on a fellowship. That's substantial time away from MIT. How unusual is that for a PhD student?

Mimi

It's not uncommon for experimental physicists to spend extended time at facilities where their experiments are running. In her case, being there in person made collaboration easier and deepened her connection to the work.

Luke

The article says working in the same office made coordination "easier" and "strengthened her connection." Those are soft claims. We don't know if her presence was essential to the experiment or just convenient.

Mark

What strikes me most is her shift from following directions to proposing her own ideas. That seems like the real growth.

Mimi

Exactly. She went from someone who was uncomfortable standing up for herself to someone confident in her judgment. That's not just about physics—that's about becoming a leader.

Luke

And that's all self-reported. We're hearing her reflection on her own growth, which is valuable, but we're not hearing from her advisors or collaborators about whether they saw that shift or how it manifested in actual decisions she made.

  • The Standard Model of physics — humanity's best map of fundamental particles and forces — has a known edge, and neutrinos may be the key to seeing past it.
  • When Reyes' original MIT project stalled, she pivoted to the Ricochet experiment in France, turning an unexpected detour into the core of her doctoral work.
  • As the experiment scaled from two detectors to eighteen, the flood of manual analysis threatened to overwhelm the collaboration — until Reyes and a colleague built automation software to absorb the burden.
  • The technical work quietly transformed her standing: she moved from executing instructions to being the person her international collaborators turned to for judgment and expertise.
  • Now finishing her PhD and eyeing a postdoctoral future, Reyes carries forward a harder-won lesson alongside her physics — that leading science means learning to trust yourself, and to wrangle people.

In a reactor facility in Grenoble, France, a young MIT physicist named Faith Reyes pursues some of the most elusive particles in the universe — neutrinos — hoping to glimpse what lies beyond the boundaries of our current understanding of matter and force. Her work with the international Ricochet collaboration is not merely a search for new physics, but a quiet testament to how scientific knowledge is built: incrementally, collaboratively, and through the willingness to adapt when the path forward shifts. What began as a high school teacher's spark has grown into a career at the frontier of particle physics, where the smallest things imaginable may hold the largest answers.

Faith Reyes did not arrive at physics with certainty. In high school, math and science felt like separate, purposeless subjects until a teacher named Ms. Bolster showed her how abstract ideas connect to real investigation. Reyes started a physics club, fell in love with the discipline, and never looked back.

Now a sixth-year PhD student at MIT's Laboratory for Nuclear Science, she works within the Ricochet collaboration — an international experiment stationed at a nuclear reactor in Grenoble, France — studying coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering. Neutrinos are ghostly particles, nearly massless and almost entirely indifferent to ordinary matter, streaming through our bodies constantly from the sun. That indifference is precisely what makes them scientifically precious: their strange properties offer a window into physics that the Standard Model, for all its accuracy, cannot yet explain.

Reyes' graduate path required more flexibility than she anticipated. When her original MIT project fell behind schedule, she redirected her focus to France, traveling there to learn the experiment's detectors firsthand. The early work was repetitive — the kind of painstaking, hands-on labor that builds deep technical fluency. But as Ricochet expanded from two detectors to eighteen, the manual workload became unmanageable. Reyes and a colleague responded by building an automation framework to handle low-level analysis and monitoring, a project that reshaped her role in the collaboration entirely. She moved from following instructions to being the person others relied upon.

That shift in trust changed her relationship to her own judgment. She reflects that earlier in her career she was reluctant to advocate for her own ideas, but leading projects and coordinating across an international team pushed her toward a harder-won confidence. Extended stays in France — including nine months through the Chateaubriand Fellowship — deepened both her scientific immersion and her appreciation for a culture that takes seriously the balance between work and life. She crochets, plays video games, and has even considered staying in France permanently.

As she looks toward a postdoctoral future, Reyes holds two kinds of knowledge: the physics of particles that barely touch the world, and the human knowledge of how science actually gets done — through mentorship, adaptability, and, as she puts it, the art of wrangling people.

Faith Reyes was not always certain she wanted to be a physicist. In high school, she studied mathematics and science as separate subjects, disconnected from any larger purpose or application. Then her physics teacher, Ms. Bolster, changed that. Bolster showed her how abstract concepts connected to the real world, how curiosity could be channeled into actual investigation. Reyes started a physics club where students gathered before school to run experiments. "I just sort of fell in love with physics then," she recalls. That enthusiasm never left her.

Now a sixth-year PhD student at MIT's Laboratory for Nuclear Science, Reyes works in the Formaggio Group studying neutrinos—elementary particles so small and so reluctant to interact with ordinary matter that they pass through the human body constantly, undetected, streaming from the sun. Detecting them at all requires ingenuity. Reyes is part of an international collaboration called Ricochet, which operates at a nuclear reactor in Grenoble, France, and focuses on observing coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, a low-energy interaction where a neutrino bounces off an atomic nucleus. The work matters because the Standard Model, the framework physicists use to describe fundamental particles and forces, is accurate but incomplete. Neutrinos, with their strange properties and minimal mass, offer a window into what lies beyond it.

Reyes' path through graduate school did not follow the trajectory she initially imagined. When she joined Ricochet, she expected to work on a project at MIT. A few years in, it became clear that project would not be ready in time. She pivoted to the work happening in France, traveling there for a three-month stint to learn the technical details of the experiment's detectors. That first visit was largely routine—she performed the repetitive work necessary to understand how the detectors functioned. But as Ricochet expanded from two detectors to nine and eventually eighteen, the volume of manual work became unsustainable. Reyes and a colleague recognized an opportunity: many of those repetitive tasks could be automated.

Together, they built a software framework that could handle much of the low-level analysis and detector monitoring that Reyes had once done by hand. The project became transformative for her development as a physicist. By working closely with the detectors and building tools to manage them, she gained a granular understanding of how the entire experiment operated. More than that, she moved from being someone who followed instructions to someone whose collaborators trusted her judgment and relied on her expertise. "It felt like my collaborators trusted me, and I had something of value to give to the collaboration," she says. The experience was both validating and humbling.

That shift in responsibility changed how Reyes approached research itself. Earlier in her academic career, she was more comfortable being directed than proposing her own ideas. Leading projects and coordinating groups pushed her to trust her own judgment. "I think I was sometimes not really standing up for myself," she reflects. "But now I feel more confident in my position and my prowess as a physicist." That confidence, she has come to understand, is one of the most important things her PhD has taught her.

Reyes has spent significant time in France—three months initially, then another three months, and most recently nine months through the Chateaubriand Fellowship. Working in the same office as her collaborators made coordination across time zones easier and deepened her connection to the experiment. She also developed an affection for French culture and its approach to work-life balance. She has even considered living there permanently. Outside the lab, she plays video games and crochets, a hobby she took up during her time in France. She often crochets while watching television, appreciating the chance to work with her hands while her mind wanders.

As Reyes moves toward the next phase of her career—she is considering a postdoctoral position—she carries with her the lessons of her graduate experience. Her research may help reveal what physics looks like beyond the Standard Model. But perhaps equally important, her time at MIT and with the Ricochet collaboration has shown her that scientific breakthroughs depend not just on individual brilliance but on mentorship, collaboration, adaptability, and the willingness to lead. "I've learned a lot of lessons," she says. "Especially about wrangling people."

The Standard Model is extremely accurate and describes most of everything that we see. But it's not complete.
— Faith Reyes, on why neutrino research matters
I've learned a lot of lessons. Especially about wrangling people.
— Faith Reyes, reflecting on her PhD experience
Contact Us FAQ