School shooting in Argentina leaves 1 dead, 8 wounded; shooter's motive unclear

One 13-year-old student killed; two students shot with pellet wounds to face and neck; six additional students injured during evacuation.
He felt he didn't fit in, had wanted to die for years
The shooter's lawyer revealed the boy had attempted suicide since age ten and expressed a long-standing sense of not belonging.

On a Tuesday morning in San Cristóbal, Argentina, a fifteen-year-old boy concealed a shotgun in a guitar case and opened fire during his school's flag ceremony, killing a thirteen-year-old classmate and wounding eight others. In a country where such violence has no established script, the town of 15,000 found itself confronting not only grief but the harder questions that follow: how suffering goes unseen, how systems fail the quietly breaking, and what justice means when the law has no category for the accused. A school porter's courage limited the carnage, but the wound left behind is one that legislation and mourning periods alone cannot close.

  • A boy who had attempted suicide multiple times since age ten arrived at school with his grandfather's shotgun hidden in a guitar case, and the morning flag ceremony became the site of Argentina's most shocking school shooting in recent memory.
  • One thirteen-year-old student was killed and two others struck by pellets in the face and neck before the firing stopped, sending dozens of children fleeing through corridors in panic.
  • School porter Fabio Barreto ran toward the gunfire rather than away, intercepted the shooter mid-reload, and physically disarmed him — a decision that, by his own account, prevented further deaths.
  • Officials rejected the bullying narrative circulating on social media, pointing instead to a family in the midst of divorce and a boy with a long, private history of depression and self-harm that had never turned outward until now.
  • Under Argentine law, the fifteen-year-old cannot face criminal charges — the age of criminal responsibility is sixteen — leaving the community to absorb both its grief and the absence of a conventional legal reckoning.
  • Santa Fe province declared two days of mourning, schools closed, and a town that had never imagined this possible began the slower, harder work of understanding how it happened at all.

The flag ceremony had just begun at Escuela Normal Mariano Moreno in San Cristóbal, a small town in Santa Fe province, when a fifteen-year-old student emerged from a bathroom, shouted "surprise," and drew a 12-gauge shotgun from a guitar case. He fired four or five times into the courtyard where his classmates had gathered for the weekly ritual. Ian Cabrera Núñez, thirteen years old, was killed. Two other students were struck by pellets — one with wounds to the face and neck — and six more were injured fleeing the building. By afternoon, the most seriously wounded were out of danger. In a country where school shootings are not part of the national imagination, the shock was immediate and absolute.

What kept the death toll from rising was the school's porter, Fabio Barreto. Hearing the shots, he moved toward them. He found the boy attempting to reload and recognized a window of opportunity — he intervened, disarmed him, and held him until police arrived. "If I hadn't stepped in, it would have been worse," Barreto said afterward. "He had already loaded to shoot at me. He aimed, but didn't have time to pull the trigger." His name spread quickly through the town as that of a hero.

In the hours that followed, a video circulated appearing to show a classmate kicking the shooter's chair while he slept — evidence, some said, of bullying. Education minister José Goity rejected the interpretation. The boy had no disciplinary record and no documented conflicts with peers. His lawyer, Mariana Oroño, offered a different portrait: a child who had attempted suicide multiple times since the age of ten, who had told a colleague he felt he didn't belong and had wanted to die for years. He had been in psychological treatment for self-harm, but had never shown violence toward others. His parents were going through a divorce. "We don't yet understand what triggered this," Oroño said.

The legal aftermath carried its own stark clarity. At fifteen, the shooter fell below Argentina's age of criminal responsibility — sixteen under current law — and could not face criminal charges. A reform lowering that threshold to fourteen had not yet taken effect. The province declared two days of mourning. What remained was a community trying to make sense of something that had seemed impossible, and a set of questions about a boy whose private anguish had, in one terrible morning, become everyone's grief.

The flag ceremony had just begun when the shots started. It was 7:15 in the morning on a Tuesday at Escuela Normal Mariano Moreno, a school in San Cristóbal, a town of 15,000 people in Santa Fe province in northwestern Argentina. Students were gathered in the internal courtyard for the weekly ritual—the raising of the flag, the start of another school week. A fifteen-year-old boy emerged from the bathroom, shouted "surprise," and pulled a 12-gauge shotgun from a guitar case he had been carrying. He fired four or five times.

When the shooting stopped, Ian Cabrera Núñez, thirteen years old, was dead. Two other students had been hit by pellets—one with wounds across his face and neck, the other with injuries less severe. Six more students were hurt as they fled the building. The two most seriously wounded were out of danger by afternoon, according to the hospital director. The others remained stable. In a country where school shootings are not routine, the shock was immediate and total. "Something like this had never happened here," people kept saying.

What prevented a worse outcome was the school porter, Fabio Barreto. When he heard the gunshots, he moved toward the sound instead of away. He saw the boy trying to reload the shotgun—a weapon that had belonged to the shooter's grandfather, according to preliminary investigation—and realized there was a moment of vulnerability. Barreto intercepted him, disarmed him, and held him until police arrived. "If I hadn't stepped in, it would have been worse," Barreto told a local news outlet. "The kid was in shock and could have killed more students. He had already loaded to shoot at me. He aimed, but didn't have time to pull the trigger." The porter's name began circulating as that of a local hero.

In the hours after, theories about motive began to surface. Some people said the boy had been bullied. A video circulated showing a classmate kicking his chair while he slept at his desk. But the education minister, José Goity, pushed back against that narrative. The shooter had no disciplinary record, had progressed through school without incident, and there was no documented history of conflict with other students. What the boy did have, Goity said, was family trouble. His parents were in the middle of a divorce.

The boy's lawyer, Mariana Oroño, added another layer. She revealed that he had attempted suicide multiple times since he was ten years old. During a conversation with one of her colleagues, he had said he felt he didn't fit in, that he had wanted to die for years. He had been in psychological treatment because of self-harm episodes, but had never shown signs of violence toward others. "We don't yet understand what triggered this," Oroño said. She and the minister both dismissed the bullying theory, characterizing the chair-kicking video as a joke between classmates. The boy's parents, she said, had not reported any bullying either.

The legal question that followed was stark: could the shooter face criminal punishment? Under current Argentine law, he could not. He was fifteen, and the age of criminal responsibility was sixteen. A reform that would lower it to fourteen had not yet taken effect. The justice minister, Pablo Cococcioni, explained this plainly: the boy was a minor without criminal liability. He would not face prison time under existing law.

The province declared two days of mourning. Schools closed. The investigation began. What remained was a town trying to process something that had seemed impossible, and a set of unanswered questions about a boy whose depression and sense of not belonging had somehow crystallized into an act of violence that killed a thirteen-year-old and wounded eight others. The shooter's motive remained unclear—not bullying, officials said, but something deeper and more private, something about a family breaking apart and a mind that had been breaking for years.

If I hadn't stepped in, it would have been worse. The kid was in shock and could have killed more students.
— Fabio Barreto, school porter
He felt that he didn't fit in and wanted to die for many years. We don't yet understand what triggered this.
— Mariana Oroño, the shooter's lawyer
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

The porter stopped him during a reload. That's a very specific moment of vulnerability. Did anyone ask why the gun jammed, or was it just the mechanics of the weapon?

Model

The reporting doesn't say the gun jammed. It sounds like Barreto saw the boy trying to reload—to put more shells in—and that's when there was a gap. A shotgun isn't instantaneous like a handgun. You have to manually chamber the next round. That's the window Barreto saw.

Inventor

And the guitar case. That's such a deliberate choice. He didn't just grab the gun from home. He hid it in something that wouldn't draw attention.

Model

Right. He brought it to school inside a guitar case, which is exactly the kind of thing you'd see a student carrying. No one stops you to check. It's camouflage built into the routine of the day.

Inventor

The lawyer says he'd been suicidal since age ten. That's a long time to carry that weight. Do we know if anyone at school knew about the treatment he was in?

Model

The reporting doesn't say. The education minister said there were no alerts in his school record, no flags. So either the school didn't know, or the information didn't travel between his therapist and the people who see him every day.

Inventor

And the parents are divorcing. That's mentioned almost casually, but it's the thing the minister points to as the real cause.

Model

Yes. The minister and the lawyer both say the family situation was the key. But they're also saying he felt he didn't belong, that he wanted to die. Those are two different kinds of pain—the immediate crisis of a breaking family, and something much older and deeper.

Inventor

So we're left not knowing which one, or if they're inseparable.

Model

Exactly. The boy himself may not have known. Depression doesn't always have a single cause you can point to and say, there—that's it.

Want the full story? Read the original at RPP ↗
Contact Us FAQ