On a day when Pakistan's National Assembly ended in dissolution, the military's chief spokesman was asked whether the army had shaped what happened, and he answered with a flat denial, placing the institution outside the constitutional turn of events. The sequence was a no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Imran Khan that never took place, a ruling that the motion was unconstitutional, and a dissolution sealed by the president on the prime minister's advice. Such moments test whether a republic's procedures or its power structures will be trusted to carry it forward. The constitutional cl
Pakistan's Military Distances Itself From National Assembly Dissolution, Says DG ISPR
"Absolutely not," he said, adding the day had nothing to do with the institution.
Mark
Why did the DG ISPR's statement draw attention at all? He's just a spokesman.
Mimi
Because the question was whether the army played a part in the day's events. When the assembly is dissolved after a vote is blocked, people ask who stood behind it. He said "absolutely not."
Mark
What exactly happened in the assembly?
Mimi
The deputy speaker ruled the no-confidence motion unconstitutional and adjourned the session. The vote on Imran Khan never took place. Then Khan advised dissolution and President Alvi approved it.
Luke
Let me separate what's confirmed from what's attributed. The denial is the DG ISPR's own statement. It's on the record, but it's one party describing its own conduct.
Mark
So it doesn't settle the question?
Luke
It tells us the military's stated position. The reporting here doesn't offer independent evidence either way, and it doesn't say whether the question came from a journalist or in what setting.
Mimi
The sequence of events is firmer: the ruling, the dissolution, the address by Khan.
Mark
And what comes next?
Mimi
Elections within 90 days under the constitution. Khan told the nation to prepare.
Luke
What we don't know from this piece is how the opposition responded or on what grounds the deputy speaker ruled. Those gaps matter.
Le Pouls
- A no-confidence vote against the prime minister was halted before it could be counted, and the floor of the house went quiet.
- The deputy speaker's ruling that the motion was unconstitutional lit a fuse of legal dispute under the whole session.
- Khan spoke to the nation, urged citizens to prepare for elections, and advised the president to dissolve the assembly, which he did.
- The military's spokesman rushed to deny any role, and the question of who really steered the day remains hanging in the air.
- With the house dissolved, the ninety-day constitutional countdown to elections has begun, and every interim decision will now be watched.
On a day when Pakistan's National Assembly ended in dissolution, the military's chief spokesman was asked whether the army had shaped what happened, and he answered with a flat denial, placing the institution outside the constitutional turn of events. The sequence was a no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Imran Khan that never took place, a ruling that the motion was unconstitutional, and a dissolution sealed by the president on the prime minister's advice. Such moments test whether a republic's procedures or its power structures will be trusted to carry it forward. The constitutional clock now runs, with elections due within ninety days, and the country's next chapter depends on whether that timetable is honored.
In Islamabad, on the day the National Assembly was dissolved, the army's chief spokesman was asked directly whether the military had been involved. Major General Babar Iftikhar, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations, answered simply: "Absolutely not." He said the day's events had nothing to do with the institution.
The question followed a session called to vote on a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan. The deputy speaker ruled the motion unconstitutional and adjourned, and the vote never happened. Khan then addressed the nation, told people to prepare for the next elections, and advised President Arif Alvi to dissolve the assembly. The president approved, ending the sitting house.
The spokesman's denial came after that approval, so it addressed the military's place in a situation already largely settled in procedural terms, not the constitutional questions behind the ruling. The constitution now requires elections within 90 days. The reasoning behind the deputy speaker's decision and the opposition's response remain unsettled, and the coming weeks will show how the interim arrangements and the election timetable take shape.
Islamabad, on a day when the National Assembly was dissolved, the military's chief spokesman was asked a direct question: was the army involved in what had just happened? Major General Babar Iftikhar, the Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations, answered with two words. "Absolutely not," he said, and added that the day's events had nothing to do with the institution.
The question was put to him in response to the rejection of the no-confidence motion and the dissolution of the assembly that followed. His answer was a clarification that the military regarded itself as outside the matter, whatever had unfolded on the floor of the house.
What had unfolded came in sequence. The session had been convened to vote on a no-confidence motion against Prime Minister Imran Khan. The deputy speaker of the National Assembly ruled to adjourn that session, describing the motion as "unconstitutional." The vote on whether Khan could keep his office did not go ahead.
After the motion was rejected, the prime minister gave a brief address to the nation. He congratulated the country and told people to get ready for the next elections. He then advised President Arif Alvi to dissolve the National Assembly, and the president approved that advice, formally ending the sitting house.
The DG ISPR's remarks came after the president's approval, so they were a response to a situation already largely settled in legal and procedural terms. His comments concerned the military's role, not the constitutional questions raised by the deputy speaker's ruling.
The constitution sets the clock from here. Elections are to be held within 90 days of the dissolution. That period is the next thing to watch: how the interim arrangements are put in place and whether the election timeline is kept.
The source reports the statements and the order of events but does not detail the reasoning behind the deputy speaker's ruling or the reaction of the opposition. Those remain the open parts of a story that moved from a scheduled vote to a dissolved assembly within a single day.
Citations marquantes
Absolutely not.— Major General Babar Iftikhar, DG ISPR, when asked if the military was involved in the day's actions
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The News International ↗
Politics & Governance