New Zealand Clinches ODI Series with Thrilling 5-Wicket Victory Over West Indies

A century that ends in defeat is worth less than two runs in a win.
Shai Hope accepted the Player of the Match award with the air of a man who found it beside the point.

Rain had been falling on McLean Park all morning, and for a while it looked like Napier might not get a game at all. Ground staff worked through the drizzle, mopping and waiting, and eventually the covers came off. What followed was the kind of match that makes you glad someone bothered.

New Zealand won the second ODI against West Indies by five wickets under the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern method, sealing the three-match series 2-0 with one game still to play. It was their 11th consecutive bilateral ODI series win on home soil — a streak that now stretches across years and opponents and, on this occasion, a weather delay that nearly swallowed the whole afternoon.

West Indies batted first on a pitch that had some early life in it, and New Zealand's seamers — Matt Henry and Nathan Smith — made good use of it. The Windies were wobbling, their top order unable to find any rhythm against the moving ball. Then Shai Hope, their captain and wicketkeeper, walked to the crease and changed everything. He scored 109 runs in a knock that was all urgency and placement, targeting the short square boundaries at McLean Park and refusing to let the bowlers settle. His century carried West Indies to 247 for 9 from their allotted 34 overs — a total that, given where they had been, felt like a rescue act.

Hope was named Player of the Match, though he accepted the award with the air of a man who found it beside the point. He said a century that ends in defeat is worth less to him than two runs in a win. He felt 247 was enough, but admitted West Indies had not batted well enough at the top of the order and had failed to force New Zealand's batters to hit straight, where the boundaries were longer.

Chasing 248 from 34 overs was a steep ask, but New Zealand's openers made it look manageable from the start. Devon Conway and Rachin Ravindra put on a century partnership — the first by a Kiwi opening pair in more than two years — and for a long stretch the run rate was never a serious concern. Ravindra made 56 before getting out just as he was hitting top gear. Conway batted beautifully, reaching 90 before falling, and for a moment the middle order wobbled: Will Young and Mark Chapman came and went quickly, and Michael Bracewell contributed little.

That left Tom Latham and Mitchell Santner, the former and current New Zealand captains, to see it home. Latham paced his innings with the calm of someone who has been in tight chases before, finishing on 39. Santner was the aggressor — 34 from just 15 balls, including a six over deep square leg off Shamar Springer that swung the momentum decisively. With eight needed off the final over, Jayden Seales — who had bowled with heart all day — sent down a no-ball that went to the boundary, and a single off the next legitimate delivery leveled the scores. Santner drove through the covers to finish it.

Seales was visibly devastated. One loose delivery in the final over, and a match West Indies had fought hard to keep alive slipped away. Hope noted afterward that his side had now lost around four close games in the final over during this stretch of cricket, and that winning those moments is what separates good teams from great ones.

Santner, for his part, acknowledged that defending totals at McLean Park is a thankless task — the short square boundaries make it a batter's ground once the ball gets old — and credited both Hope's innings and his own openers for making the day what it was.

The third and final ODI moves to Hamilton on November 22. For West Indies, it is a chance to avoid a sweep and take something home from a tour that has been full of close finishes and not enough wins. For New Zealand, it is an opportunity to make the streak twelve.

He would rather score just two or five runs and win the match than score a century and lose the game.
— Shai Hope, West Indies captain, on his Player of the Match century
It is so difficult to defend on a ground like this — once the ball gets older, batters can get in and score heavily.
— Mitchell Santner, New Zealand captain
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

What actually decided this match — the batting or the bowling?

Model

The batting, in the end. But the bowling set the table. Henry and Smith had West Indies in real trouble early, and if Hope doesn't play that innings, the target is probably 180, not 247.

Inventor

Hope scored a century and still lost. How does a player process that?

Model

He said he'd rather score two runs and win. That's not false modesty — it tells you something about how he leads. The hundred meant nothing to him without the result.

Inventor

The opening stand between Conway and Ravindra — how significant was it?

Model

Enormous. A century partnership, the first by a Kiwi opening pair in over two years. It meant New Zealand were never really chasing the game, just managing it.

Inventor

And then the middle order wobbled anyway.

Model

It did. Young, Chapman, Bracewell — none of them contributed. For a while it looked like New Zealand might make it interesting in the wrong way.

Inventor

What saved them?

Model

Latham's steadiness and Santner's hitting. Two captains, one current and one former, finishing the job together. There's something fitting about that.

Inventor

The final over — what happened there?

Model

Seales needed to defend eight runs. He bowled a no-ball that went for four, then conceded the single that leveled it, then Santner drove the winning run. One bad ball undid everything.

Inventor

Is this New Zealand side genuinely dominant at home, or just hard to beat?

Model

Eleven straight bilateral series wins at home suggests something more than luck. They know their conditions, they have depth, and they find ways to close out tight games — which is exactly what West Indies keep failing to do.

Inventor

What does West Indies take into the final match in Hamilton?

Model

Honestly? The knowledge that they've been competitive in every game. Hope's century, Seales's effort in the final over — the talent is there. But close isn't enough, and they know it.

Contact Us FAQ