Haaretz reported UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu by phone of imminent Hamas attack, which Netanyahu and Israel's security agencies allegedly dismissed. Netanyahu calls the report 'fabricated' and 'politically motivated,' claims his call logs show no such conversation occurred, and accuses Palestinian figure Muhammad Dahlan of orchestrating the story.
Netanyahu sues Haaretz over report of pre-October 7 UAE warning
His call logs show no trace of it whatsoever
So Netanyahu is suing Haaretz over a story about a warning he allegedly ignored. What exactly did the newspaper claim happened?
Haaretz reported that the UAE president called Netanyahu ten days before October 7 to warn him that Hamas was planning a major attack. The warning had come through intelligence channels—Sinwar had apparently told people he was preparing a "huge surprise" and told them to tell Israel to expect an earthquake.
But here's the thing—we only have Haaretz's account of what happened. Netanyahu says his call logs show no such conversation. We don't have independent confirmation of the phone call itself.
Right, and that's why Netanyahu is suing. He's calling it fabricated. He says his security team reviewed everything and found nothing.
Why would Netanyahu sue if the story is simply false? Doesn't that draw more attention to it?
That's a fair question. It could be a legal strategy to discredit the journalists and the outlet, or it could be that he feels the accusation is serious enough to warrant a response. The timing is notable—this comes right before elections where he's already trailing in polls.
The UAE won't comment on whether the conversation happened. That's interesting. They're not confirming or denying anything.
So we're left with Haaretz's reporting against Netanyahu's denial, with no third-party verification either way.
Exactly. And Netanyahu is also blaming a Palestinian political figure, Muhammad Dahlan, for orchestrating the story. But Dahlan's representatives deny that too. So we have multiple layers of claim and counter-claim, and very little that's independently verified.
What we do know for certain is that October 7 happened, that over 1,100 Israelis were killed, and that questions about pre-attack intelligence have been central to the political debate ever since.
So this lawsuit is really about controlling the narrative around what Netanyahu knew and when he knew it.
And about the election. Netanyahu needs to discredit this story before voters go to the polls in October.
O Pulso
- Haaretz reported UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu by phone 10 days before October 7, 2023
- Netanyahu denies the call occurred and says his call logs contain no record of it
- October 7 attacks killed at least 1,195 Israelis and took 251 captive; subsequent Gaza operations killed at least 73,669 Palestinians
- Netanyahu is trailing in October Knesset election polls against former military chief Gadi Eisenkot
Haaretz reported UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed warned Netanyahu by phone of imminent Hamas attack, which Netanyahu and Israel's security agencies allegedly dismissed. Netanyahu calls the report 'fabricated' and 'politically motivated,' claims his call logs show no such conversation occurred, and accuses Palestinian figure Muhammad Dahlan of orchestrating the story.
Netanyahu denies and threatens legal action against Haaretz for reporting that UAE's MBZ warned him of Hamas attack plans 10 days before October 7, 2023.
Benjamin Netanyahu announced Wednesday that he will pursue legal action against Haaretz newspaper and two of its journalists over a report published the day before. The story, written by Shlomi Eldar and Ruth Yaval, claimed that Mohammed bin Zayed, the president of the United Arab Emirates, had telephoned Netanyahu ten days before the October 7, 2023 attacks to warn him of an impending Hamas offensive. Netanyahu called the report "fabricated" and "false" in a statement posted to X, and said his legal team had been instructed to sue both the newspaper and its authors.
The Haaretz account alleged that bin Zayed, commonly known as MBZ, had received intelligence through intermediaries suggesting that Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was planning what he called a "huge surprise." According to the report, Sinwar had told contacts to warn Israel to "expect an earthquake." The UAE president and his advisors interpreted these signals as evidence of a major coordinated attack and passed the information to Israel's Shin Bet internal security agency. The report stated that Shin Bet dismissed the threat, and that MBZ then raised the warning directly with Netanyahu, who also set it aside.
On October 7, 2023, Palestinian fighters killed at least 1,195 people in southern Israel and took approximately 251 others captive. The attacks triggered an Israeli military campaign in Gaza that has resulted in the deaths of at least 73,669 Palestinians. The question of what intelligence Israel possessed before the assault, and how seriously it was treated, has remained a point of intense scrutiny and political contention.
Netanyahu's response centered on two main denials. He stated that his National Security Council and Military Secretary had reviewed his call logs for the relevant period and found no record of any conversation with MBZ. He also characterized the Haaretz report as "politically motivated" and part of what he called the "left's election campaign," a reference to the October Knesset elections in which he is seeking to retain his position as prime minister. Current polling shows Netanyahu trailing former military chief Gadi Eisenkot.
In an additional statement, Netanyahu claimed that Muhammad Dahlan, a Palestinian political figure who was expelled from Fatah in 2011 following a power struggle with Palestinian Authority president Mahmoud Abbas, was responsible for orchestrating the false report. Dahlan, who now lives in the UAE, has been accused by Netanyahu of being the source behind the story. Representatives for Dahlan rejected the allegation, according to Israeli media reports.
The UAE government declined to engage with the substance of the allegations. Its Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a brief statement saying that "the UAE government does not comment on media stories or speculation regarding conversations between government leaders." The ministry offered no confirmation or denial of the reported phone call or the intelligence warning.
The dispute arrives at a moment of significant political vulnerability for Netanyahu. With elections scheduled for October, he faces a competitive race and has been working to consolidate support. The Haaretz report, regardless of its accuracy, raises questions about pre-attack intelligence assessments and decision-making at the highest levels of Israeli government—questions that have shadowed Netanyahu's leadership since October 7 and that his political opponents have repeatedly pressed. His aggressive legal response signals an intent to discredit the story and its authors before the election cycle intensifies.
Citações Notáveis
The report is fabricated and false, and Netanyahu has instructed lawyers to sue Haaretz and the journalists who wrote it— Benjamin Netanyahu, in a statement on X
The UAE government does not comment on media stories or speculation regarding conversations between government leaders— UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs