NASA Weighs Meteor Hazards as It Plans a Permanent Moon Base by 2032

Much smaller meteor strikes will happen with greater frequency.
Isaacman separated the rare building-sized impact from the smaller, more frequent strikes NASA is weighing.
Mark

Why does a crater from 2024 matter to a base planned for 2032?

Mimi

It put a concrete number on the risk: a building-sized object, a crater about 728 feet wide. Isaacman was asked about it directly at Kennedy Space Centre.

Luke

Worth noting he called it once-in-a-century. That's the reassuring part of his answer, and it's his characterisation, relayed from scientists.

Mark

So what is the real concern?

Mimi

Smaller strikes, which he said happen far more frequently. With no atmosphere, rocks arrive at high speed.

Luke

Do we know how frequent, or how dangerous to a habitat? The reporting doesn't say. "Greater frequency" is all we have.

Mark

Where did the Artemis II observations come in?

Mimi

The crew saw several flashes of meteoroids hitting the surface on the far side, and relayed observations that Isaacman said added data.

Luke

Several flashes is an anecdote, not a hazard model. He said "additional data," not conclusions.

Mark

How is NASA responding?

Mimi

By not locking in habitation designs. Rovers will map the surface, and robotic landers will run demonstrations first.

Luke

And the schedule hangs on New Glenn, which exploded in a May test. The December-or-January target is Blue Origin's, as Isaacman described it, not a confirmed date.

  • A recently revealed 2024 impact that gouged a crater about 728 feet wide has pushed meteor hazards to the centre of Moon base planning.
  • Frequent small meteor strikes, unslowed by any atmosphere, are forcing NASA to question whether habitat designs can be locked in yet.
  • Rovers, robotic landers and uncrewed demonstrations are being sent ahead to map terrain and test surface defences step by step.
  • The crewed landing target of 2028 and base by 2032 rests on Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket, which exploded in a May engine test and must return to flight soon.
  • The next decisive tests are Artemis III next year and whether New Glenn flies again around the turn of the year.

Beneath the Moon's silent, airless surface, rocks fall unshielded and strike at speeds no atmosphere would ever allow, and so NASA's ambition to plant a lasting human outpost there must now reckon with an old and indifferent hazard. Jared Isaacman, speaking at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, told reporters that planners are weighing these impacts carefully, even as a rare and enormous 2024 collision, a crater some 728 feet across, is seen as a once-in-a-century event. The deeper lesson is patience: the agency intends to scout, test and learn through many quiet robotic missions before it commits to permanent habitats, treating survival as a science still being written.

At a briefing in Florida on Friday, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman was asked what a recently revealed lunar impact meant for the agency's plans for a Moon base. He said planners were giving the matter serious thought, and that hazardous environmental factors would have to be built into any outpost from the start.

The question grew from a discovery made last month. A comet or asteroid, roughly the size of a six-storey building, had struck the surface in 2024, leaving a crater about 728 feet wide and 141 feet deep. Scientists describe it as a once-in-a-century event. Isaacman took comfort in its rarity, but noted that far smaller strikes happen constantly, and with no atmosphere to slow them, they arrive at high speed. Astronauts on the Artemis II flyby around the far side had already seen several such flashes, and Isaacman credited their observations with adding to what NASA knows.

The larger plan remains ambitious: crewed landings in 2028 and a base running by 2032, with routine crew rotations. Before that, Artemis III is set to test docking between Orion and commercial landers from Blue Origin and SpaceX. Isaacman said NASA will not fix habitat designs until more is understood. Rovers will map the ground, and a series of uncrewed landers will test what he called a science of survival, moving forward in a logical, iterative way.

Blue Origin's heavy-lift New Glenn rocket is central to the timetable, and it exploded during a test in May. Isaacman praised the company's progress and said it was aiming for year's end, whether that meant December or January. Asked whether he would bet on a 2028 landing, he said NASA was committing public money to it in the most responsible way possible, and that the effort, though monumental, was achievable.

At a briefing at the Kennedy Space Centre in Florida on Friday, NASA administrator Jared Isaacman was asked a pointed question: what does a recently revealed asteroid strike on the Moon mean for the agency's plans to build a base there? His answer was that planners are "giving a lot of thought" to meteor impacts, and that hazardous environmental factors will have to be accounted for in establishing an outpost.

The question had a specific origin. Last month it emerged that a comet or asteroid, roughly the size of a building up to six storeys high, struck the lunar surface in 2024. It left a crater about 728 feet wide and 141 feet deep. Scientists have called the collision a once-in-a-lifetime event, the kind that happens about once a century.

Isaacman leaned on that rarity. "Fortunately, that's a once-in-a-century type of an event," he said. But he added that much smaller meteor strikes occur on the lunar surface far more often. The Moon has no atmosphere to burn up incoming rocks, so they hit at high speed.

Some of the data on those smaller strikes came from the Artemis II mission earlier this year. As the crew travelled around the far side of the Moon, the astronauts saw several flashes as meteoroids slammed into the surface. Isaacman credited the crew and the observations they relayed back for adding to what NASA knows.

The broader plan is to land people on the Moon again in 2028, and to have a base running by 2032 that provides a continual human presence with routine crew rotations. The project is also meant to develop technologies for deeper space voyages, Mars among them. Before any of that, Artemis III is scheduled to launch next year, with four crew members testing low Earth orbit docking between the Orion spacecraft and commercial lunar landers built by Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin and Elon Musk's SpaceX.

Isaacman said the hazard question is one reason NASA is not fixing habitat designs yet. A fleet of lunar rovers will scout and map the surface to inform the outpost's development. "We're going to learn and we're going to gradually scale up capabilities because I guarantee you we're going to need surface improvement," he said, describing a "science of survival" built on many uncrewed robotic landers and demonstrations. Environmental hazards, he said, will be addressed "in a logical, iterative way."

Blue Origin's role is central, and its recent setback came up. The plans depend largely on the heavy-lift New Glenn rocket, which exploded during an engine-firing test at the end of May. Isaacman said he was impressed by the company's progress, noting it has been open about targeting the end of the year. Whether it launches in December or slips to January, he said, "they're breaking everyone's records."

Pressed on whether he would put money on a 2028 crewed landing, Isaacman said NASA is putting taxpayer money on it, in the most efficient and responsible way it can. He acknowledged "a monumental effort is ahead" but called the path achievable, saying NASA has the mandate, the resources and stakeholder support. The near-term test is Artemis III next year, along with the stream of uncrewed Moon missions meant to run in parallel, and whether New Glenn returns to flight by around the turn of the year.

We are giving a lot of thought to that for the Moon base.
— Jared Isaacman, NASA administrator
This is an achievable path we are on right now.
— Jared Isaacman, NASA administrator
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur The Irish News ↗
Nous contacter FAQ