A culture secretary stands in the narrow space between loyalty and conviction, refusing the old cycle of in-or-out while admitting that a decade of disappointment has left the country unsettled. Behind her, a prime minister tests whether a divided cabinet can be steered toward closer ties with Europe without reopening the wounds that Brexit left behind. The question hanging over the moment is less what Britain will choose than whether it can be given a real choice at all.
Nandy warns against 'circular arguments' on rejoining EU as Burnham's Brexit reset divides cabinet
"I don't know if that's a choice we have."
Mark
Nandy says she wants to avoid circular arguments about rejoining. Is she opposing Burnham?
Mimi
Not outright. She says the UK should still pursue closer ties to deliver what was promised in 2016. Her objection is to the in-or-out framing, not to the direction.
Luke
But the reporting says she "appeared to suggest" she opposes rejoining. Her actual words were "I don't know if that's a choice we have." That's ambiguous, not a clear position.
Mark
Why does her seat matter here?
Mimi
Wigan voted overwhelmingly to leave in 2016. She is among the cabinet's most cautious voices on reversing Brexit, so her tone signals the political risk.
Mark
And the Reform UK worry?
Mimi
A handful of ministers privately fear an honest conversation reopens a row that only Farage benefits from.
Luke
Worth noting that's described as private warnings, and the number is only "a handful." We don't know their names beyond Reynolds and Mahmood being described as cautious about fully rejoining.
Mark
What does Brussels expect?
Mimi
Agreements on farming and food, emissions trading and youth visas are expected on 20 November. Barnier says no cherrypicking of the four freedoms.
Luke
Expected, not signed. And Burnham's manifesto mandate and confirmatory referendum come from unnamed senior figures, so treat them as intentions, not policy.
Le Pouls
- Cabinet ministers are openly split, with Lisa Nandy resisting rejoin talk while Burnham pushes for an honest national conversation on Brexit.
- Ministers privately fear that reopening the Brexit argument could hand Nigel Farage's Reform UK an easy win at the next election.
- A Remembrance Sunday row over Erasmus has sharpened the clash, with Conservatives accusing Nandy of turning a civic occasion into an EU pitch.
- Burnham is working through the Dublin summit and a 20 November Brussels reset meeting, seeking to lock in agreements before a speech on closer relationship options.
- Brussels is pushing back, with Michel Barnier rejecting any single market à la carte, so the path ahead looks narrow and contested.
A culture secretary stands in the narrow space between loyalty and conviction, refusing the old cycle of in-or-out while admitting that a decade of disappointment has left the country unsettled. Behind her, a prime minister tests whether a divided cabinet can be steered toward closer ties with Europe without reopening the wounds that Brexit left behind. The question hanging over the moment is less what Britain will choose than whether it can be given a real choice at all.
On Sunday morning, Lisa Nandy went on the BBC and Sky News with a message that was careful about what it ruled out and careful about what it left open. She told the BBC she did not believe anyone wanted to repeat "circular arguments" about in or out, and that the British people had been badly let down over the past decade.
The interview exposed a split at the top of Andy Burnham's government. Nandy represents a Wigan seat that voted heavily to leave in 2016, and she is among the most cautious ministers about reversing it. Asked whether she wanted to go back in, she replied, "I don't know if that's a choice we have." Privately, she and others worry that Burnham's plan for an "honest conversation" about Brexit could reopen a row that only Nigel Farage's Reform UK would profit from.
Yet she did not break with him. She conceded that the deal Britain got was not what it had been promised, and argued for closer ties as a way to deliver on those promises, pointing to "trade-offs and choices" that the country must discuss. Reynolds and Mahmood share her caution, and Burnham's aim is a mandate in Labour's next manifesto to open negotiations, with any later referendum purely confirmatory.
The diplomatic calendar is crowded. Burnham goes to the European Political Community summit in Dublin, then a Brexit reset meeting in Brussels on 20 November, where agreements on agriculture, emissions trading and youth visas are expected. A speech on options for a closer relationship is due soon after. Brussels, through Michel Barnier, has made clear there will be no cherrypicking of the single market's freedoms.
Nandy also faced a sharp row over Remembrance Sunday, after linking Britain's return to Erasmus Plus to honouring those who served. Conservatives accused her of making an EU pitch on a national occasion. She answered that she only wanted young people across the country to understand what earlier generations contributed to lives they never met.
The Dublin summit, the Brussels meeting and Burnham's speech will show how far the prime minister can lead a divided cabinet.
On Sunday morning, Lisa Nandy went on the BBC and Sky News with a message that was careful in what it ruled out and careful in what it left open. The culture secretary told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg that she did not believe anybody wanted to repeat "circular arguments" about in or out, leave or remain. What she did believe, she said, was that over the past decade the British people had been let down very badly.
The interview exposed a split at the top of Andy Burnham's government over how far to revisit Brexit. Nandy sits in a Wigan seat that voted overwhelmingly to leave in 2016, and she is among the most cautious cabinet members about reversing it. Asked directly whether she wanted to go back in, she answered: "I don't know if that's a choice we have." She is one of a handful of ministers who are worried about the prime minister's plan for an "honest conversation" with the public about Brexit. In private, they warn it could reopen a row that would benefit only Nigel Farage's Reform UK.
Yet she did not distance herself entirely from Burnham. On Sky News she conceded he was trying to address real failings, saying it was important to be honest that "the deal that we got is not what we were promised." She argued the prime minister should pursue closer ties to deliver on the promises made at the referendum, and that there were "trade-offs and choices" requiring a conversation with people across the country. That framing suggests Brexit will be a central theme of the next election campaign.
Nandy is not the only cautious voice. The business secretary, Jonathan Reynolds, and the home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, are also wary of pushing to rejoin fully. Burnham has announced his intention to move beyond Labour's "red lines" on the EU after the next election. Senior government figures say he wants a mandate to open negotiations in Labour's next manifesto, with any later referendum purely confirmatory. One of them said: "You can't ask people to vote on an undefined plan like in 2016. That was David Cameron's mistake."
The diplomatic calendar is crowded. Burnham attends the European Political Community summit in Dublin on Thursday, where Downing Street sources say he will try to get Labour's reset deal over the line and meet many European leaders for the first time. EU counterparts will expect him to set out his ambitions for deeper integration. On 20 November, a Brexit reset meeting in Brussels is expected to confirm agreements on agriculture and food, emissions trading and youth experience visas. Officials will also discuss the next round, which could include another attempt to join the EU's €150bn (£125bn) Safe defence fund, cooperation on law enforcement and borders, and visas for touring artists. Burnham told the Sunday Mirror the summit "doesn't need to be the end of our ambition."
Soon after Brussels, he is expected to give a speech setting out options for a closer relationship, arguing it serves the UK's long-term interest. No 10 sources say he wants to "frame the conversation, not go straight to the endgame" before testing public opinion.
Brussels has its own warning. Michel Barnier, the EU's former chief Brexit negotiator, told the BBC that London could not have a "single market à la carte" by choosing which of the four freedoms, including free movement, it wanted. "There is no cherrypicking," he said.
Nandy also had to defend herself over Remembrance Sunday. She had linked the UK's return to the Erasmus Plus scheme to honouring "the immense courage of those who served our country." Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative chair, accused her of using a national civic occasion to "try to make an EU membership pitch," adding: "Our veterans did not fight for a student exchange scheme." Nandy replied that the Conservatives were "the only party that is talking about Brexit and the EU," and that the weekend's announcement was a widening of Erasmus. She said she could not see what was political about wanting young people from every part of the country to understand what their grandparents and great-grandparents contributed to the lives of people they never met.
The Dublin summit on Thursday, then the Brussels meeting on 20 November and Burnham's speech after it, will show how far the prime minister can take a divided cabinet.
Citations marquantes
I do not believe that anybody wants to repeat circular arguments about in or out, leave or remain.— Lisa Nandy, culture secretary, on BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg
There is no cherrypicking. There will be no possibility to have one freedom and not the other.— Michel Barnier, former EU chief Brexit negotiator, to the BBC
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The Guardian ↗
Politics & Governance