At the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, researchers have built a tool called MARQO that asks a quiet but consequential question: what becomes possible when machines absorb the burden of repetition, freeing human expertise for the work only humans can do? By automating the analysis of stained cancer tissue slides — a process that has long consumed hours of skilled pathologist time — MARQO points toward a future where the gap between a cancer diagnosis and a personalized treatment plan might be measured in minutes rather than days. Published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, the work is
Mount Sinai researchers unveil MARQO, AI tool to accelerate cancer tissue analysis
Automation plus expertise keeps human judgment at the center
So this tool processes entire tissue slides in minutes. How is that faster than what pathologists do now?
A pathologist examining a slide by hand might spend hours, and they're usually only looking at small sections. MARQO scans the whole thing at once and flags the cells that matter—coordinates, marker intensity, everything structured and ready.
But it doesn't make the diagnosis itself, right? The pathologist still has to validate?
Exactly. MARQO does the sorting and measuring. The pathologist confirms it's right and interprets what it means. It's automation plus expertise.
Why does it matter that it works across different staining technologies?
Because right now, if one lab uses staining method A and another uses method B, comparing their results is hard. MARQO handles both, so findings become reproducible across studies.
Is it being used in hospitals yet?
Not for clinical diagnostics. It's research-only right now. But it was built using staining methods that clinics already use, so the path to clinical use exists.
What's the real bottleneck it solves?
Time and consistency. A pathologist can only look at so much tissue in a day. MARQO lets them process vastly more slides and compare results reliably.
And the funding—National Cancer Institute grants plus Mount Sinai seed money. That's a solid foundation, but this is still early stage?
Yes. The team is planning to improve the interface, add more analysis features, and scale it up for millions of slides. Clinical validation would come later.
Le Pouls
- Cancer tissue analysis has long been a bottleneck — painstaking, subjective, and nearly impossible to compare consistently across labs or institutions.
- MARQO processes entire tissue slides in minutes on standard lab hardware, extracting cellular coordinates and marker intensity data that would otherwise take a pathologist hours to compile.
- Unlike competing systems that fragment slides into patches or demand expensive computing clusters, MARQO works across multiple common staining technologies, making cross-study reproducibility a realistic goal.
- The tool does not replace pathologists — it flags, maps, and measures, then hands findings to a human expert for validation and interpretation, preserving the clinical judgment that automation cannot replicate.
- Though currently limited to research use, MARQO's compatibility with standard clinical staining methods positions it as a credible candidate for eventual deployment in hospital pathology labs.
At the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, researchers have built a tool called MARQO that asks a quiet but consequential question: what becomes possible when machines absorb the burden of repetition, freeing human expertise for the work only humans can do? By automating the analysis of stained cancer tissue slides — a process that has long consumed hours of skilled pathologist time — MARQO points toward a future where the gap between a cancer diagnosis and a personalized treatment plan might be measured in minutes rather than days. Published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, the work is less a replacement of human judgment than a recalibration of where that judgment is most needed.
A research team at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine has developed MARQO, a computational tool that automates the analysis of stained cancer tissue slides — work that has traditionally demanded hours of microscope time and manual review from trained pathologists. The research, published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, reflects a broader ambition: let machines handle the sorting, so human expertise can focus on interpretation.
When cancer is diagnosed, pathologists stain tissue samples to highlight immune cells and biomarkers, then map what's present and how cells are spatially arranged. The process is slow, subjective, and difficult to replicate across different labs. MARQO was built to address that bottleneck. Led by immunology professor Sacha Gnjatic, the tool processes whole slides intact — not broken into smaller patches as many competing systems require — and completes analysis in minutes on standard graphics processing units already common in research labs.
Critically, the system keeps pathologists in the loop. MARQO identifies marker-positive cells, assigns them coordinates, and measures intensity, but a pathologist reviews and validates every finding. This hybrid model — automation paired with expert oversight — is designed to catch what fully automated systems might miss.
The team, which includes researchers Mark Buckup, Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova, and others, received funding from the National Cancer Institute and Mount Sinai. Though MARQO is currently a research tool, it was built using staining methods already standard in clinical pathology labs — a deliberate choice that could ease its eventual transition into hospital settings. Future development will focus on refining the interface, expanding spatial analysis capabilities, and scaling the system to handle millions of digitized slides, with the goal of making cancer diagnostics faster, more consistent, and more accessible across institutions.
A team at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai has built a computational system that could reshape how pathologists examine cancer tissue. The tool, called MARQO, automates the work of analyzing stained tissue slides—a task that has long demanded hours of manual labor and microscope time. The research, published in Nature Biomedical Engineering, represents a shift toward letting machines handle the heavy sorting work while keeping human judgment at the center of diagnosis.
When a patient is diagnosed with cancer, pathologists stain tissue samples with special markers that highlight immune cells and other biomarkers, then examine them under a microscope to map what's present and how cells are arranged. This process is painstaking. A pathologist might spend hours on a single slide, and even then, the analysis often covers only small sections of the tissue. The work is subjective, time-consuming, and difficult to compare across different labs or studies. MARQO was designed to solve this bottleneck.
Sacha Gnjatic, a professor of immunology and immunotherapy who led the project, explains that the tool fills a gap between what's technically possible and what's practical. Other image analysis systems exist, but they typically require researchers to break slides into smaller patches or rely on expensive computing clusters. MARQO processes entire slides intact and completes the analysis in minutes on standard graphics processing units—the kind of hardware most labs already have. The system works across multiple common staining technologies, which means results from different studies become easier to compare and validate.
The workflow keeps pathologists in control. MARQO automatically identifies cells likely to be positive for specific markers, assigns them coordinates, and measures marker intensity. But it doesn't make the final call. A pathologist reviews the system's work, validates the findings, and interprets what they mean. This hybrid approach—automation plus expertise—is what distinguishes MARQO from fully automated systems that might miss nuance or introduce errors that go unnoticed.
The implications extend beyond research. MARQO is currently designed for laboratory use and has not been validated for clinical diagnostics, but it was built using staining methods that are already standard in pathology clinics. That compatibility means the tool could eventually move into hospital labs, where it might accelerate the discovery of biomarkers that predict which patients will respond to specific treatments. Faster, more consistent analysis could support the development of personalized cancer therapies tailored to individual tumor profiles.
The research team, which includes Mark Buckup, Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova, Igor Figueiredo, Pauline Hamon, and Giorgio Ioannou, received funding from the National Cancer Institute through multiple grant mechanisms, along with seed support from Mount Sinai itself. The group plans to continue refining the tool—improving its interface, adding spatial analysis features, and scaling it to handle millions of digitized slides in high-performance computing environments. The next phase will test whether MARQO can deliver on its promise to make cancer diagnosis faster, more precise, and more reproducible across institutions.
Citations marquantes
We designed MARQO to fill a major gap in the field: turning complex whole-slide images into usable, structured data quickly and consistently. By automating the heavy lifting, we let experts focus on interpretation and discovery.— Sacha Gnjatic, Professor of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai