Israeli President Herzog Tasks Eisenkot With Forming Government After Split Election Result

Not every commitment and promise can be fulfilled.
Herzog told parties during consultations that pre-election pledges may have to give way to avoid another vote.
Mark

Why did Herzog pick Eisenkot when Netanyahu leads the largest single bloc?

Mimi

Bloc size isn't the test. The president can choose whoever he thinks is likeliest to assemble a coalition. Eisenkot got 67 recommendations from incoming members to Netanyahu's 46.

Mark

So neither side has 61, and the Arab parties hold 19 seats. Does that settle it?

Mimi

It makes them potential kingmakers, but nearly every Jewish party pledged not to work with them. The numbers give them leverage, but the pledges block it.

Luke

Worth saying that 'kingmakers' is a description of arithmetic, not a prediction. Nothing in the reporting says either Arab alliance has been offered or has accepted anything.

Mark

Herzog said not every commitment and promise can be fulfilled. How should we read that?

Mimi

As a hint that pre-election vows may have to bend if another election is to be avoided. It's an expectation he voiced in consultations.

Luke

It's a general remark. The source doesn't say which pledges he meant or that anyone has agreed to break one.

Mark

What are Eisenkot's realistic paths?

Mimi

A unity government with Netanyahu, a right-wing coalition with defectors from Eisenkot's bloc, or an Eisenkot-led government backed by Arab parties. The 2020 Netanyahu-Gantz rotation shows unity deals happen.

Luke

And there's speculation about an Arab-party agreement, but it's only speculation. Eisenkot and all but one in his bloc have refused it, and the ultra-Orthodox route is described as difficult too. We don't know yet which path, if any, works.

  • Neither Netanyahu's bloc of 53 seats nor Eisenkot's 48 reached the 61 needed, leaving the chamber split with no clear path.
  • Two Arab-led alliances holding 19 seats now sit at the center of every calculation, even as most Jewish parties have pledged to shut them out.
  • Eisenkot has 28 days, extendable by 14, to assemble a coalition, and the clock is already ticking.
  • A unity deal modeled on the 2020 Netanyahu-Gantz arrangement is being openly weighed as a way out of the deadlock.
  • If pre-election pledges hold firm, the country could slide back toward another vote after five elections in just three years.

In a country where no party has ever governed alone, Israel's president has handed the first chance at forming a government to Gadi Eisenkot, a former military chief whose bloc, like Benjamin Netanyahu's, fell well short of the Knesset majority after last week's vote. The outcome leaves the balance in the hands of the Arab-led parties, whose record turnout gave them nineteen seats, yet whom most of the Jewish parties have sworn not to join. Whether the country moves toward a unity arrangement, a right-wing alliance, or another election will depend on how far those pre-vote promises can bend under the weight of arithmetic.

Israel's president, Isaac Herzog, has given opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot the first opportunity to build a new government. The decision follows an election that left both major blocs short of a majority in the 120-seat Knesset, and it gives Herzog wide latitude, since he is not bound to pick the leader of the largest party.

The numbers explain the impasse. Netanyahu's Likud and its allies took 53 seats, while Eisenkot's centrist Yashar party and its partners won 48. Neither side is close to 61. The surprise came from the two Arab-led alliances, which together won 19 seats after a surge in Arab voter turnout. That gives them the power to decide who governs, but most Jewish parties had promised before the vote not to work with them.

Eisenkot, a former military chief, now has 28 days to put a government together. He called on X for a national emergency government and promised to do everything to live up to the task. Three broad paths remain: a unity government including both Netanyahu and Eisenkot, a right-wing coalition built with defectors from Eisenkot's bloc, or an Eisenkot-led government supported by the Arab parties. Each route runs into the promises politicians made during the campaign.

The unity option has a recent model. In 2020, after three deadlocked elections, Netanyahu and Benny Gantz shared power with the premiership rotating between them. The years that followed were among the most fractured in Israeli history, and the memory of that turmoil hangs over the talks.

Herzog has already signaled that rigid promises may need to give way. He said he expected factions to understand that not every commitment can be kept in the current situation. Whether those pledges bend in the coming weeks will determine whether Eisenkot succeeds or the country heads to yet another vote.

Israel's president, Isaac Herzog, has chosen opposition leader Gadi Eisenkot to take the first attempt at building a new government, after an election last week that left both major blocs short of a majority in the 120-seat Knesset.

The arithmetic explains why the decision was open. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party and its far-right and ultra-Orthodox allies won 53 seats. Eisenkot's centrist Yashar party and three other Jewish opposition parties in his bloc won 48. Neither is near the 61 needed. Two Arab-led alliances, the United Arab List and the Joint List, together took 19 seats, an unprecedented total that followed a surge in turnout among Arab voters.

That result puts those two alliances in a position to decide who governs. But all but one of the Jewish parties pledged before the vote not to work with them to form a government. No party in Israel has ever won an outright majority, so every government in the country's history has been a coalition. The question is what kind this one will be.

Herzog spent the week consulting delegations from the incoming Knesset members. His office said Eisenkot received 67 recommendations for the premiership and Netanyahu 46. The president has broad discretion here: he can pick whoever he believes has the best chance of assembling a coalition, and he does not have to choose the leader of the largest party. His office said it had informed both Eisenkot and Netanyahu of the decision.

Eisenkot, a former military chief, now has 28 days to form an administration, with a possible 14-day extension. He responded on X, writing that it was time to form a national emergency government and that he would do everything to be worthy of the task.

The results pointed to three broad routes. One is a national unity government that includes both Netanyahu and Eisenkot. Another is a right-wing coalition in which Netanyahu is joined by defectors from Eisenkot's bloc. The third is an Eisenkot-led government backed by the Arab parties. Eisenkot and every member of his bloc except one have previously refused to enter government with Arab parties, though there has been speculation that an agreement could still be reached. A deal with the ultra-Orthodox parties is another possibility, but it too would be hard to achieve.

There is precedent for the unity option. In 2020, after three deadlocked elections, Netanyahu and the centrist Benny Gantz agreed a power-sharing deal in which the premiership rotated between them. The years from 2019 to 2022 were among the most fractured in Israeli politics, with five separate elections as Netanyahu and his rivals repeatedly failed to cooperate.

Herzog has tried to head off a repeat. In his consultations he said he expected factions and their representatives to understand that, in the current reality, not every commitment and promise can be fulfilled. The remark reads as a nudge toward compromise on the pre-election pledges that now stand in the way. Eisenkot's 28-day clock is running, and whether those pledges bend will decide whether he succeeds or the country faces another vote.

Now is the time to form a national emergency government. I will do everything to ensure we are worthy.
— Gadi Eisenkot, on X
In the current reality, not every commitment and promise can be fulfilled.
— President Isaac Herzog, during party consultations
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BBC News ↗
Contáctanos FAQ