How a Pro-Israel Super PAC's $2M Bet Backfired in New Jersey's 11th District Primary

AIPAC created this race for themselves
A New Jersey Democratic strategist, speaking anonymously, on the super PAC's $2 million push against Malinowski.
Mark

Why does a $2 million ad campaign that never mentioned Israel matter so much?

Mimi

Because UDP said it targeted Malinowski over his talk of conditioning aid, yet the ads attacked him on ICE funding and Covid-era stocks. The stated reason and the public message didn't match.

Mark

And it may have helped Mejia?

Mimi

Several voices say so. The anonymous strategist argued it turned a sleepy primary into something else. The establishment vote was already split among Malinowski, Gill and Way.

Luke

Careful, though. That strategist is anonymous, and Roginsky ran the pro-Malinowski super PAC. Neither is a neutral observer.

Mark

So can we say the spending caused the outcome?

Luke

No. The count isn't final, and the article itself lists several factors: the fractured field, the weakened state machine, voter frustration. It also notes a crowded special primary isn't a bellwether.

Mimi

The polling is real context, though. 71% of Democrats saying Israel's response went too far is a big shift.

Luke

Agreed, but those are national numbers. They don't tell us why NJ-11 voters chose as they did.

Mark

What should we watch?

Mimi

Whether UDP spends in June, and in races like Foushee's, Stevens's and Bell's.

Luke

And who actually wins. That's still unknown.

  • A super PAC spending over $2 million against Tom Malinowski has drawn unwanted attention to the race and to its own methods.
  • Malinowski, once the favorite, now trails progressive Analilia Mejia by a narrow margin while votes remain uncounted.
  • A fractured establishment field split its support among several candidates, leaving an opening that Mejia's movement-style campaign filled.
  • Party leaders, critics, and even pro-Israel strategists are openly debating whether the spending helped create the outcome it hoped to prevent.
  • The super PAC insists it will keep monitoring dozens of primaries, including the June NJ-11 contest, as skepticism toward unconditional Israel support grows among Democrats.

In New Jersey's 11th Congressional District, a special Democratic primary has ended in a count still too close to call, but one truth has already settled: a costly effort by a pro-Israel super PAC to defeat former Rep. Tom Malinowski has turned against its own purpose. The contest, shaped by a divided party establishment and a fading machine politics, has lifted an outsider progressive, Analilia Mejia, into a narrow lead. It is a reminder that money can shift a race without ever deciding it, and that voters, weary of old alliances, sometimes reward the candidate who seems to stand outside them.

The race for New Jersey's 11th Congressional District was still too close to call after Thursday's special Democratic primary, but one result was already plain: a heavy pro-Israel super PAC spending had backfired. The United Democracy Project, funded largely by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, spent more than $2 million against former Rep. Tom Malinowski, who was narrowly behind progressive activist Analilia Mejia as ballots were still being tallied. The ads may have hurt him, and they also helped split the establishment vote in a crowded field.

Malinowski had entered as a favorite, but party leaders never united behind him. Mejia took the progressive lane with support from Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the Working Families Party, running on her outsider status and a promise to stay out of the political machine. At a Friday press conference, switching between English and Spanish, she credited her time spent with voters and a campaign that avoided going negative.

UDP said it targeted Malinowski for having spoken of conditioning aid to Israel, yet its ads never mentioned Israel, criticizing him instead over a budget vote and stock trades. A veteran strategist not involved in the race said AIPAC had created the contest it wanted to avoid, while Julie Roginsky, who ran the super PAC backing Malinowski, argued that AIPAC's conduct was bad for Jews, for Israel, and for bipartisan support.

UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton called the outcome an anticipated possibility and said the group will keep watching dozens of primaries, including the June NJ-11 race. The group has $96 million on hand, and the question now is whether it tries again in a Democratic electorate that is growing more skeptical of unconditional support for Israel.

The race for New Jersey's 11th Congressional District was still too close to call after Thursday's special Democratic primary. One outcome was already clear, though: the heavy spending by a prominent pro-Israel super PAC had backfired.

The United Democracy Project, a super PAC that has taken in tens of millions of dollars from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, spent more than $2 million to bring down former Rep. Tom Malinowski. When counting paused, Malinowski was narrowly behind progressive activist Analilia Mejia, with more votes still to be tallied. The ads may have hurt him. They also helped split the establishment vote in a crowded field, and Mejia was positioned to take advantage.

Malinowski served two terms in Congress after winning a swing seat in 2018, and he entered the race as a favorite. But party leaders did not unite behind him. Sen. Andy Kim backed him, while former Gov. Phil Murphy and other prominent figures endorsed Essex County Commissioner Brendan Gill, and others supported former Lt. Gov. Tahesha Way. Mejia took the progressive lane, with endorsements from Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka and the Working Families Party. Her ads stressed her outsider status: "I don't work for the political machine."

At a Friday press conference, where she switched between English and Spanish, Mejia credited her approach. She said she spent as much time as she could talking to voters, did not go negative, and focused on issues and people's daily problems.

Malinowski was generally seen as a supporter of Israel in Congress. UDP told media outlets it targeted him because he had spoken of conditioning aid to Israel. Its ads, however, never mentioned Israel. They criticized him for approving funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement in a bipartisan budget deal during President Trump's first term, and accused him of corruption for "cashing in on Covid-related stocks while in Congress."

A longtime New Jersey Democratic strategist who was not involved in the race, and who spoke on condition of anonymity, said AIPAC "created this race for themselves" by spending millions to defeat a moderate and ending up with a progressive outside the frame it would like. The strategist said that without the spending it would have been a sleepy primary, though also credited a "perfect storm" in which Mejia was "building a movement." Julie Roginsky, a veteran New Jersey strategist who ran the super PAC backing Malinowski, wrote on X that she is a pro-Israel Jew and that AIPAC's conduct was bad for Jews, bad for Israel, and bad for bipartisan congressional support for the issues AIPAC says it cares about.

The winner is expected to finish with about 30% of the vote. That reflects several overlapping factors: a splintered establishment field, the decline of the state party machine that once controlled these primaries, rising frustration among Democratic voters, and the super PAC money.

UDP spokesperson Patrick Dorton called the result "an anticipated possibility" and said the group's focus is on who serves the next full term. He said UDP will monitor dozens of primaries, including the June NJ-11 primary. The group ended 2025 with $96 million in the bank after a $30 million AIPAC donation. It spent $61 million in 2023 and 2024, including more than $22 million to unseat Reps. Jamaal Bowman in New York and Cori Bush in Missouri, and more than $4 million to help Sarah Elfreth win an open Maryland seat. In the prior cycle it spent $33 million, mostly in Democratic primaries.

The politics around Israel have been shifting. A September AP-NORC poll found 71% of Democrats thought Israel's response in Gaza had gone "too far," up from 63% a year earlier. Pew found 18% of Democrats viewed the Israeli government favorably. Gallup found in March that 59% of Democrats sympathized more with Palestinians, the first majority in over 20 years of asking. Sixty-one Democrats are co-sponsoring the "Block the Bombs" bill. Ocasio-Cortez wrote that "moderate or progressive, AIPAC is not our friend."

Candidates UDP has backed before face tough primaries ahead, including Reps. Valerie Foushee, Haley Stevens and Wesley Bell, and Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales. The June NJ-11 primary will show whether the group tries again here.

What AIPAC did in this race is bad for Jews, bad for Israel, and bad for having bipartisan congressional support.
— Julie Roginsky, strategist who ran the pro-Malinowski super PAC
UDP will be closely monitoring dozens of primary races, including the June NJ-11 primary.
— Patrick Dorton, UDP spokesperson
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em NBC News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ