On a Tuesday in Nuuk, Greenland's lawmakers approved a three-way security pact with the United States and Denmark, opening the Arctic island to a larger American military footprint. It is the quiet end of a turbulent year, in which a territorial ambition voiced in Washington gave way to a negotiated arrangement that keeps Greenland under Danish sovereignty while reaffirming its people's right to determine their own future. Whether the arrangement was worth the storm that preceded it, and whether it will bring tangible benefit to the island, remain open questions that the coming weeks in Copenh
Greenland's Parliament Ratifies US Security Deal Easing Trump's Territorial Pressure
Peace and stability are no longer something Greenland can take for granted
Mark
Greenland's parliament has approved the deal. What exactly did it approve?
Mimi
A three-way security and military-access agreement with the US and Denmark. It allows two new American bases and the Golden Dome missile defence system, while Greenland stays under Danish control and keeps its right to self-determination.
Mark
And how did we get here?
Mimi
Trump began demanding control of the island in January, threatening force and tariffs on European allies. A Davos meeting with NATO's Mark Rutte on January 21 produced a "concept of a deal," which became the September agreement.
Luke
Careful with the framing, though. The source says critics believe this deal could have been reached without the threats. That's an argument, not an established fact.
Mimi
Fair. What is documented is that Denmark had said it would discuss a bigger US presence, and that it rejected the idea of Greenland becoming US territory.
Mark
Is the US not already present there?
Mimi
Yes, under a 1951 agreement it has wide freedom to act. But it has drawn down over the years and now keeps only Pituffik Space Base in the northwest, used for missile defence and radar.
Luke
Does the reporting say where the new bases will go, or what Greenland gets financially?
Mimi
No. Pele Broberg of Naleraq says no economic benefit has been gained, but that is one opposition leader's view, and the source gives no figures.
Mark
So is it done?
Mimi
Not yet. Denmark's parliament votes on November 19.
Luke
And the text of the agreement isn't quoted here, so the details of the bases remain unknown to us.
Der Puls
- Greenland's parliament has approved a US-Denmark security deal that opens the island to two new American bases and Trump's Golden Dome missile shield.
- The agreement was born from fierce pressure, after Trump threatened force and tariffs in January over Greenland's future.
- Pro-independence critics in Nuuk say the island has gained no economic benefit and want a better deal for a future independent state.
- The deal stays inert until Denmark's parliament votes on November 19 in Copenhagen, so the final word has not yet been spoken.
On a Tuesday in Nuuk, Greenland's lawmakers approved a three-way security pact with the United States and Denmark, opening the Arctic island to a larger American military footprint. It is the quiet end of a turbulent year, in which a territorial ambition voiced in Washington gave way to a negotiated arrangement that keeps Greenland under Danish sovereignty while reaffirming its people's right to determine their own future. Whether the arrangement was worth the storm that preceded it, and whether it will bring tangible benefit to the island, remain open questions that the coming weeks in Copenhagen will help answer.
On Tuesday, just before lawmakers in Nuuk cast their votes, Foreign Minister Mute Egede warned the chamber that peace and stability can no longer be taken for granted. Shortly afterward, Greenland's parliament approved a three-way security and military-access agreement with the United States and Denmark, clearing the way for a larger American military presence on the Arctic island.
The deal was signed in September on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly by Donald Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen. Its terms allow two new US bases and room for Trump's Golden Dome missile defence system, while Greenland stays under Danish control and Greenlanders' right to self-determination is reaffirmed. The result was never really in doubt; a majority had already signalled support in a debate last month.
Not everyone was satisfied. Pele Broberg of the pro-independence Naleraq party argued that Greenland should secure a better agreement, one that benefits the island economically and prepares it for eventual independence, since so far it has gained nothing of economic value.
The path here was rough. In January, Trump began demanding that the US take control of Greenland, threatening force and tariffs against European allies, and citing unspecified threats from China and Russia. Relations between Washington and Copenhagen strained, and NATO allies were unsettled. Tensions eased on January 21, when Trump and NATO chief Mark Rutte announced a 'concept of a deal' at Davos, which eventually became the September agreement. Denmark had long been open to a larger US footprint, but rejected the idea of Greenland becoming American territory.
Critics note that the same outcome might have been reached without the upheaval, since the US already has broad military freedom under a 1951 agreement and today maintains only the Pituffik Space Base.
The agreement takes effect only after Denmark's parliament ratifies it, with the final vote scheduled for November 19 in Copenhagen.
On Tuesday, shortly before lawmakers in Nuuk voted, Greenland's Foreign Minister Mute Egede told the chamber that peace and stability can no longer be taken for granted. Then Greenland's parliament approved a three-way security and military-access agreement with the United States and Denmark, clearing the way for a larger American military presence on the Arctic island.
The agreement was signed in September on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York. Its signatories were US President Donald Trump, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen and Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen. It followed months of negotiation. Its terms allow two new US military bases and make room for Trump's "Golden Dome" missile defence system. Greenland remains under Danish control, and the text reaffirms the right of Greenlanders to self-determination.
The vote was not a surprise. In a first debate last month, a majority of Greenlandic lawmakers had already signalled their support. Not everyone was persuaded the island was getting much in return. Pele Broberg, chair of the pro-independence Naleraq party, said his side wants a better agreement, one Greenland can benefit from once it becomes an independent state. As it stands, he argued, no economic benefit has come from this one.
The backdrop is a bruising year. In January 2026, Trump began calling for the US to take control of Greenland, a self-governing territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. He threatened military force, and tariffs against European allies, if he did not get his way. His stated reasoning was that Denmark was not doing enough to defend the island from unspecified threats from China and Russia. The pressure damaged relations between Washington and Copenhagen and unsettled America's European partners in NATO.
Things cooled on January 21. Trump met NATO chief Mark Rutte on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, and the two announced a "concept of a deal" for expanded US defence access to Greenland. That outline later developed into the September agreement. Denmark, for its part, had said repeatedly that it was willing to discuss a larger US military footprint. What it rejected was the more extreme demand that Greenland become American territory.
Critics have noted that the same outcome might have been reached without the upheaval of territorial and tariff threats. The US already enjoys considerable freedom of military action in Greenland under a 1951 agreement. Over the years it voluntarily drew down its presence there. Today it keeps only the Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland, which is used for missile defence and radar surveillance.
The agreement is not yet in force. It takes effect only after ratification by Denmark's parliament, which is due to read the bill over two sessions in November. The vote is scheduled for November 19 in Copenhagen.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
No economic benefit has been gained from the agreement.— Pele Broberg, chair of the Naleraq party
Peace and stability are no longer something we can take for granted.— Mute Egede, Greenlandic Foreign Minister
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Deutsche Welle ↗
Politics & Governance