Some systems fail not with a crash but with a quiet decision, and the shelving of Project Whetū is one of those. A platform meant to let agencies share what they know about family violence risk has been set aside after two years and $2 million, because no one could find a sustainable way to fund and run it. Agencies carry on with older, manual methods while officials weigh whether the technology might one day return, leaving a gap between what a shared view would make possible and what is currently in hand.
Government Shelves Project Whetū, Leaving Family Violence Agencies Without Shared Case Management System
The only affordable option is an Excel-based form
So what actually got shelved here?
A shared case management platform, Project Whetū. It would have let agencies see the same information when responding to family violence, and flagged high-risk situations to staff.
And why was it stopped?
The board paused it in December 2025 because there was no practicable or sustainable way to fund, host and operate it. $2m had already been spent over two years, and about $5.2m was approved to go back to the Crown.
Worth being clear that the reason given is about funding and hosting, not about whether the system would work. The documents don't say it failed.
What are agencies using instead?
Existing systems, and officials are exploring contingencies including an Excel-based form, which they describe as the only no-cost option.
And the risks listed come from officials, not critics: no shared view for triage and risk assessment, manual processes, data security vulnerabilities.
The minister says frontline services haven't been reduced.
Yes, and that the high-risk protocol and information sharing guidance are still progressing.
That's her assurance. The reporting doesn't independently show how those pieces work without the platform. Andersen's warning that people could fall through the cracks is a political claim about risk, not a documented case.
Could it come back?
Possibly, if a sustainable way to host it is found or funding prioritisation allows, subject to the Government Chief Digital Officer.
No timeline or funding commitment is stated. That part is simply unknown.
Il Polso
- A planned shared system for tracking family violence risk has been halted after $2m was spent, leaving agencies without a common view of the information they need.
- Papers obtained under the Official Information Act reveal officials relying on an Excel form as a fallback, a stark contrast to the ambitions first set out.
- Opposition voices warn that without shared risk data, people in danger may slip through the cracks between agencies.
- The minister insists frontline services are unaffected and that non-technical protocols continue, while promising a review of whether the platform can be hosted.
- The outcome now hinges on whether funding is prioritised and whether the Government Chief Digital Officer finds a workable hosting path.
Some systems fail not with a crash but with a quiet decision, and the shelving of Project Whetū is one of those. A platform meant to let agencies share what they know about family violence risk has been set aside after two years and $2 million, because no one could find a sustainable way to fund and run it. Agencies carry on with older, manual methods while officials weigh whether the technology might one day return, leaving a gap between what a shared view would make possible and what is currently in hand.
The fallback officials have named for tracking family violence cases across government agencies is an Excel form, chosen because it is the only option that costs nothing. Papers released under the Official Information Act, obtained by RNZ, show how a shared case management system called Project Whetū came to be shelved.
The project, proposed by the Centre for Family Violence and Sexual Violence Prevention, was meant to help agencies share information safely when they responded together to family violence. It promised more timely coordinated responses, greater visibility of children so support could reach them, stronger data security, and alerts for high-risk situations. In December 2025 the executive board decided to pause it, finding no practicable or sustainable way to fund, host and operate it. By then $2m had been spent, and about $5.2m was approved to be returned to the Crown.
Agencies are continuing with existing systems. Officials acknowledge the risks: without an integrated system, they lack a shared view for triage and risk assessment, rely heavily on manual processes, and face data security and information sharing vulnerabilities.
Minister Karen Chhour says only the technology is paused, while non-technical work such as the high-risk protocol and information sharing guidance proceeds, with no cut to frontline services. The decision will be reviewed, and the platform could resume if a workable hosting arrangement or funding priority emerges. Labour's Ginny Andersen called the decision an absolute shocker, arguing that people at risk can fall through the cracks when agencies cannot join the dots.
What comes next depends on whether that review happens, whether funding is ever directed to the platform, and whether the Government Chief Digital Officer finds a way to host it. Until then, agencies work without the shared view that officials themselves say effective risk assessment requires.
The fallback that officials have named for tracking family violence cases across government agencies is an Excel-based form. In the words of the documents, it is "the only affordable" option, meaning the only one that costs nothing. That detail comes from papers released under the Official Information Act and obtained by RNZ, which describe how a planned shared case management system called Project Whetū came to be shelved.
The project was proposed by the Centre for Family Violence and Sexual Violence Prevention. It was meant to change how agencies share information safely and appropriately when they respond together to family violence. The planned platform would have supported more coordinated and timely multi-agency responses, made children more visible so that appropriate support is in place, improved data security, and alerted staff to high-risk situations.
In December 2025 the executive board for the Elimination of Family Violence and Sexual Violence decided to pause it. The documents give the reason as there being no practicable or sustainable way to fund, host and operate the platform. By then $2m had been spent over two years. The board approved about $5.2m being returned to the Crown.
Agencies are carrying on with existing systems in the meantime. Officials say they are exploring contingencies, including the Excel form, and acknowledge it has pros and cons. They also set out the risks of the status quo. Without a fit-for-purpose integrated case management system, agencies lack a shared view of the information needed for effective triage and risk assessment. They continue to rely mainly on manual processes, which the documents say constrains efficiencies and reduces the potential return on investment. And there are vulnerabilities in data security and information sharing.
Karen Chhour, Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence and Sexual Violence, said that only the technology component is on pause. She said she had been assured that the non-technical parts of the best practice operating model for multi-agency responses continue to progress, including the high-risk protocol and information sharing guidance. In her statement, the decision to pause has not resulted in any reduction to frontline services. She said the decision will be reviewed, and that if a practical or sustainable way to host and operate the platform is found, the technology piece could resume. That, she added, is also subject to any directives from the Government Chief Digital Officer. The documents likewise say it could restart if funding prioritisation allows.
Labour's police spokesperson Ginny Andersen called the decision "an absolute shocker". She said the Government is scrapping a project designed to help agencies identify people at risk of family violence even though officials warned that without it, vital information cannot easily be shared. When agencies cannot join the dots, she said, people at risk can fall through the cracks, with devastating consequences. She said the Government should be strengthening the response and needs to explain why it is walking away.
What to watch is whether the promised review happens, whether funding is ever prioritised for the platform, and whether the Government Chief Digital Officer weighs in on how it could be hosted. Until then, agencies are working without the shared view that officials themselves say effective risk assessment requires.
Citazioni salienti
The decision to pause Project Whetū has not resulted in any reduction to frontline services.— Karen Chhour, Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence and Sexual Violence
When agencies can't join the dots, people at risk can fall through the cracks.— Ginny Andersen, Labour police spokesperson