At the United Nations General Assembly, world leaders arrived in New York with a shared ambition: to demonstrate that global governance could proceed without American direction. What unfolded instead was a quiet reckoning — that even in an era of erratic U.S. leadership, the gravitational pull of American power shapes every coalition, every negotiation, and every silence. The week did not reveal a post-American world so much as it revealed how deeply the world still orbits Washington, whether it wishes to or not.
Global Powers Test New Alliances at UN, But US Gravity Remains Inescapable
The U.S. is still the central player, even when unpredictable.
So these countries showed up ready to work around the U.S., and it just didn't hold?
Not exactly. They got real things done—Finland and France signed actual military agreements with Ukraine, Saudi Arabia and Turkey deepened their defense compact. But every time they tried to move forward on something bigger, they hit a wall.
What kind of wall? Be specific.
Trump rejected the AI oversight declaration as globalist. Rubio invited Putin to the G20 and met with Russian envoys. The Europeans were suddenly divided on how to respond. The whole "middle powers" thing requires some kind of consensus, and Washington kept pulling the rug out.
Did any of the new alliances actually survive the week?
The military stuff did. Finland's drone deal with Ukraine, France's radar contracts, the Saudi-Pakistan-Turkey compact—those are real. But on the diplomatic and policy level, where you need everyone pulling together, it fell apart.
How much of that was Trump being unpredictable versus these countries just not having enough leverage?
Both. Trump's moves—the Putin invitation especially—exposed that Europe doesn't actually have a unified position. Germany's foreign minister welcomed the idea. Romania pivoted to talking about sanctions instead of taking a stand.
So what's the takeaway? Can these middle powers ever actually work together?
Maybe on military and security issues where there's a direct threat. But on bigger questions—AI governance, Iran policy, Ukraine's future—they keep discovering they need the U.S. involved anyway.
And Xi skipping the UN to go straight to Washington?
That's the real story. The General Assembly was full of earnest discussions about new global arrangements. But the actual power was happening in Washington, at Trump's summit with China. That's where the world's attention went.
So nothing changed?
Things changed tactically. But structurally? The U.S. is still the central player. Everyone knows it. They just wish it weren't true.
Il Polso
- Middle powers arrived at the UN with concrete plans — drone agreements, AI declarations, trade frameworks — determined to prove that multilateralism could function without U.S. blessing.
- Washington shattered that confidence mid-week when Rubio announced Putin's G20 invitation, and White House envoys quietly negotiated with Moscow in New York, reminding Europe that America sets the terms of any real diplomacy.
- The AI governance push collapsed almost instantly when Trump dismissed it as a globalist scheme, exposing how little international ambition matters when the nations building the technology refuse to participate.
- Gulf and Middle Eastern leaders performed regional solidarity while privately keeping their eyes fixed on Washington — Trump's fifteen-minute closed-door meeting carried more weight than any multilateral summit.
- The week's most telling moment happened off the UN floor entirely: Xi Jinping skipped the General Assembly to meet Trump in Washington, signaling that the world's real negotiations occur wherever America decides to hold them.
At the United Nations General Assembly, world leaders arrived in New York with a shared ambition: to demonstrate that global governance could proceed without American direction. What unfolded instead was a quiet reckoning — that even in an era of erratic U.S. leadership, the gravitational pull of American power shapes every coalition, every negotiation, and every silence. The week did not reveal a post-American world so much as it revealed how deeply the world still orbits Washington, whether it wishes to or not.
The United Nations General Assembly this week became a test of a simple question: can the world lead itself? Leaders arrived in New York determined to answer yes. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Spain's Pedro Sanchez pointedly declined meetings with Trump. Diplomats spoke of a historic opening for "middle powers" to chart their own course on Ukraine, artificial intelligence, and Iran.
For a moment, the effort looked credible. Finland and Norway unveiled an AI oversight declaration signed by nearly two dozen nations. France convened a Security Council session on AI safety. On Ukraine, Europeans secured drone agreements, radar contracts, and military cooperation frameworks — real money, real equipment, real commitments.
Then Washington moved, and everything shifted. Secretary of State Rubio announced that Putin had been invited to the G20 in Miami. European leaders called it hard to hear, yet Germany's foreign minister quietly welcomed the idea — exposing the fractures beneath the alliance's confident surface. Meanwhile, White House envoys met privately with Russian counterparts in New York. The message was unmistakable: America was negotiating with Moscow on its own schedule.
The AI initiative fared no better. Trump's dismissal of international oversight as a "globalist scheme" effectively ended the conversation. France and Britain floated competing proposals. The EU had not fully committed. Nothing moved forward — even as Australia's prime minister reported that an OpenAI agent had breached his country's health system.
In the Middle East, the pattern held. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey deepened their own alliance frameworks. France pledged soldiers to protect Saudi energy infrastructure. Yet when Trump gathered Gulf leaders for a closed-door session, that fifteen-minute meeting — described by one insider as "only PR" — carried more real weight than any multilateral forum. Netanyahu put it plainly, calling Trump "our greatest partner."
The week's defining image came from outside New York entirely. Xi Jinping skipped the General Assembly to meet Trump in Washington instead. That choice said what no speech could: the world's attention, and its real negotiations, follow American gravity — however unpredictable the source of that gravity has become.
The United Nations General Assembly this week became a stage for an old story with new actors. World leaders arrived in New York determined to prove they could build coalitions, set agendas, and solve problems without waiting for Washington to lead. They left with a humbler understanding of how the world actually works.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Spain's Pedro Sanchez, both vocal critics of President Donald Trump, made a point of announcing they would not meet with him. The timing seemed right for a collective stand. Trump's approval ratings had hit historic lows, and Republicans were fighting to hold Congress in November midterms. The moment felt like an opening for what diplomats call "middle powers"—nations working together to bypass American dominance and chart their own course on Ukraine, artificial intelligence, and Iran.
For a few days, it looked like it might work. Finland and Norway arrived with a declaration on AI oversight signed by nearly two dozen countries, including Australia, Canada, Estonia, and the UAE. France convened a Security Council session where Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for global standards on AI testing. On Ukraine, the Europeans notched real wins: Finland signed a drone agreement with Kyiv, France announced contracts for radars and interceptors, and Germany's foreign minister headed to Ottawa to discuss trade and military cooperation with Canada. These were not symbolic gestures. They were concrete commitments of money and equipment.
But the week also delivered a sharp lesson in the limits of independence. When Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the U.S. had invited Russian President Vladimir Putin to the G20 meeting in Miami and encouraged him to attend, the diplomatic ground shifted. European leaders called it "hard to hear." Yet the reaction exposed fractures among the supposed allies—Germany's foreign minister actually welcomed the idea. Rubio also met privately with his Russian counterpart, and White House envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff met with Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev in New York. The message was clear: Washington was negotiating with Moscow on its own terms, and Europe would have to adjust.
On artificial intelligence, the gap between ambition and reality proved even starker. Trump had dismissed international AI efforts as a "globalist scheme." That single statement hollowed out the entire initiative. As James Lewis, a former State Department official, put it bluntly: "The people who make 90% of AI don't want to play." France and Britain each floated their own competing proposals. The EU itself had not fully signed on. There was no central initiative that moved forward, even as Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reported that OpenAI agents had hacked his country's health system.
In the Middle East, the pattern repeated. Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey met during the week to discuss deepening their alliance, including creating a general secretariat and working groups. France announced it would send soldiers and equipment to protect Saudi energy facilities. Yet when Trump gathered Gulf and Muslim allies for a closed-door meeting on Tuesday, the real business happened there. A person familiar with the discussions said Trump made no commitments and the meeting lasted about fifteen minutes—"only PR," they said. But they also noted that on this issue, unlike others, "everyone knows the U.S. has to be involved and will be involved." Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the point most directly, calling Trump "our greatest partner" and thanking him for bold leadership.
Allison Minor, who served in senior roles on Gulf policy under both the Biden and first Trump administrations and attended events at the General Assembly, captured the underlying reality. "There's just so much muscle memory, kind of expecting the United States to come in and provide that convening power and direction," she said. "The reality is the U.S. is still the central player." The world's leaders had come to New York to prove otherwise. They left understanding that American gravity remains inescapable, even when American leadership is unpredictable. The real power plays, it turned out, were happening elsewhere—in Trump's summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Washington, where Xi had chosen to go instead of addressing the General Assembly. That snub said everything about where the world's attention actually rests.
Citazioni salienti
There's just so much muscle memory, kind of expecting the United States to come in and provide that convening power and direction. The reality is the U.S. is still the central player.— Allison Minor, former State Department official
The people who make 90% of AI don't want to play.— James Lewis, former State Department official