In the long and contested history of who belongs in the academy and why, Ghent University now finds itself at the center of a painful reckoning — one that began with internal doubts about a researcher's qualifications and ended, months later, with the death of a Cambridge professor whose life was upended by that same researcher's accusations. The questions raised about Nathan Cofnas's appointment in May 2026 — his limited expertise, his ideologically charged online presence, his contested credentials — were documented and delivered to university leadership long before Jason Arday faced public
Ghent professors questioned Cofnas's qualifications months before Arday's death
Jason Arday, a Cambridge sociology professor, died on August 14 following intense media scrutiny triggered by plagiarism allegations from Cofnas.
The views he disseminates are simply not based on sound research.
Mark
So the department flagged concerns about Cofnas months before any of this became public. Why did it take so long for the university to act?
Mimi
That's the question everyone's asking. The concerns were formal, detailed, signed off by the department council. But the university didn't suspend him until after Arday died and the whole thing exploded in the media.
Mark
What were they actually worried about—his research record, or his views?
Mimi
Both, really. They said his CV didn't match the job description. But they were also explicit about the pseudoscience he was promoting online. Those aren't separate issues for them—they're connected.
Mark
And Arday? He was already under attack when the department made their statement?
Mimi
No, that's the thing. The plagiarism accusations came later. The department's concerns about Cofnas were already on record. So when Cofnas then accused Arday, there was already this institutional knowledge that something was off about Cofnas's appointment.
Mark
Did anyone connect those dots publicly at the time?
Mimi
Not that I can see. The plagiarism story dominated. Arday was the one being scrutinized, not Cofnas's hiring process. By the time people started looking back at how Cofnas got the job, Arday was already gone.
Mark
What does the university say now?
Mimi
They're being careful. They suspended him, they talk about academic freedom having limits, but they won't say exactly what they're investigating him for. It's all very measured.
The Pulse
- Ghent's philosophy department compiled a 19-page formal objection in May, arguing it was 'very improbable' Cofnas had been the strongest candidate among 14 applicants for a role his CV did not appear to qualify him for.
- Nearly 500 staff, students, and outside academics had already raised alarms in March about Cofnas's pseudoscientific racial theories and the opacity of his hiring — yet the university did not act.
- Months after those internal warnings were filed and ignored, Cofnas publicly accused Cambridge sociologist Jason Arday of plagiarism, triggering a wave of media scrutiny that Arday himself described as a 'racist feeding frenzy.'
- Arday, described by colleagues as a tireless advocate for underrepresented communities in academia, died on August 14 after weeks of intense public pressure over allegations that have never been formally proven.
- Ghent University suspended Cofnas only after Arday's death became public, leaving unanswered whether the suspension concerns his appointment, his conduct, or both.
- More than £224,000 has been raised for Arday's family, a measure of the grief and admiration that outlasts the controversy — and a quiet indictment of what was lost.
In the long and contested history of who belongs in the academy and why, Ghent University now finds itself at the center of a painful reckoning — one that began with internal doubts about a researcher's qualifications and ended, months later, with the death of a Cambridge professor whose life was upended by that same researcher's accusations. The questions raised about Nathan Cofnas's appointment in May 2026 — his limited expertise, his ideologically charged online presence, his contested credentials — were documented and delivered to university leadership long before Jason Arday faced public scrutiny over unproven plagiarism claims. That the institution acted only after tragedy struck invites a deeper question about the cost of institutional hesitation when the stakes are human lives.
When Nathan Cofnas joined Ghent University in March 2026 as a postdoctoral researcher focused on the future of liberalism, the welcome was far from warm. Within weeks, the university's philosophy and moral sciences department had drafted a 19-page formal statement questioning whether he should have been hired at all. Delivered to the rector on May 28, the document described his publication record as showing 'very limited expertise' in political philosophy and liberalism — the very subjects the position required. Professors found it 'very improbable' he had been the strongest among 14 candidates, and noted pointedly that despite the views he promoted online, he had never actually conducted research on intelligence. Those views, they concluded, were 'simply not based on sound research.'
The concerns went beyond credentials. Cofnas had used social media to promote pseudoscientific claims about racial and ethnic differences, including assertions about Jewish and Black populations that drew widespread condemnation. A broader coalition — 48 staff, 73 students, and 367 academics from multiple institutions — had already written to university leadership in March expressing 'astonishment and indignation.' Many suspected the appointment had been 'an ideological choice decided in advance.'
Despite these documented objections, the university did not act. Then, in August, Cofnas publicly accused Jason Arday — a sociology professor at Cambridge — of plagiarism. The allegations, never formally proven, ignited weeks of intense media scrutiny. Arday acknowledged errors in his work but described what followed as a 'racist feeding frenzy' and said he had endured cruelty he found unbearable. Colleagues remembered him as 'the most gentle, generous, encouraging person,' someone who devoted his career to opening academic spaces to those who had been excluded. He was found dead on August 14.
Only after Arday's death did Ghent University suspend Cofnas, pending a preliminary investigation. The university's leadership affirmed academic freedom while acknowledging it 'is not unlimited.' Cofnas, for his part, called the criticism an attempt to silence him. The timeline — internal warnings raised and ignored months before a man died — has become its own kind of indictment. More than £224,000 has since been raised for Arday's family, who said they were moved by a response that reflected 'the number of people whose lives were touched by our beloved Jason.'
Nathan Cofnas arrived at Ghent University in March 2026 with a postdoctoral research position focused on the future of liberalism. Within weeks, the university's philosophy and moral sciences department had compiled a 19-page formal statement questioning whether he was qualified for the role at all.
The department's concerns were specific and damning. In a statement delivered to the university's rector on May 28, professors wrote that they found it "very improbable" Cofnas had been the strongest candidate among 14 applicants. They noted his publication record showed "very limited expertise" in the subjects central to the project—political philosophy, liberalism, and demography. The job posting had explicitly required a strong research interest in liberalism. Cofnas's CV, they argued, did not demonstrate this. More pointedly, they observed that Cofnas had never actually conducted research on intelligence, despite the views he promoted online and in blog posts. Those views, the department stated, were "simply not based on sound research."
The concerns extended beyond academic credentials. Cofnas's online activity had promoted pseudoscientific ideas about racial and ethnic differences. In a 2023 post on X, he wrote that Jews possessed superior capabilities for capitalizing on intelligence compared to non-Jewish people. Similar claims appeared in his discussions of Black and white populations. The department's statement, approved as the faculty's official position on May 27, suggested the appointment lacked transparency and that "a large majority" of colleagues suspected it had been "an ideological choice … decided in advance."
These internal objections were not isolated. In March, before the department's formal statement, 48 staff members, 73 students, and 367 academics from Ghent and other universities had signed an email to university leaders expressing "astonishment and indignation" at Cofnas's hiring. The scale of the response signaled deep institutional unease about both his qualifications and his intellectual orientation.
Months later, in August, Jason Arday—a sociology professor at Cambridge—was found dead on the 14th. Arday had faced weeks of intense public scrutiny after Cofnas accused him of plagiarism, allegations that have not been formally proven. Arday had acknowledged "mistakes" in his work but described the treatment he received as a "racist feeding frenzy" and said he had endured unacceptable cruelty. A colleague described him as "the most gentle, generous, encouraging person" who worked constantly to bring communities into academic spaces.
The timeline matters: the questions about Cofnas's fitness for his position had been raised months before the plagiarism accusations against Arday, before the media scrutiny, before Arday's death. Yet the university had not acted on those concerns until after the controversy surrounding Arday had become public. Last week, Ghent University announced it had suspended Cofnas pending a preliminary investigation, though officials did not specify whether the suspension related to his appointment or to other conduct.
In response to allegations about his qualifications, Cofnas stated that his academic credentials were "a matter of public record" and accused critics of trying to have him fired or imprisoned for expressing his ideas. The university's leadership, in a joint statement, said they took "great importance" in academic freedom while also noting that such freedom "is not unlimited" and "may be restricted in order to protect the rights of others."
More than £224,000 has been raised for a fund established to support Arday's family. In a statement, they said they were "deeply moved" by the response, which they said reflected "the number of people whose lives were touched by our beloved Jason and the affection, respect and admiration in which he was held."
Notable Quotes
We find it very improbable that Nathan Cofnas was the best out of 14 candidates. We observe only very limited expertise regarding the subjects that are central to the project.— Ghent University philosophy department, May 28 statement to rector
Jason was the most gentle, generous, encouraging person. He wanted to bring communities into the academic space.— Colleague of Jason Arday
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Education