Encuesta Cadem: 88% respalda aumentar penas a reclutadores de menores

Apoyan acciones contra criminales, no restricciones contra ciudadanos
Los chilenos respaldan medidas que apunten directamente a delincuentes, pero dudan de suspender derechos civiles.
Mark

Why does recruiting minors for crime get such overwhelming opposition—88 percent—when other measures score lower?

Mimi

It hits something primal. You're not just talking about crime; you're talking about adults corrupting children. There's no ambiguity there. Everyone sees the adult as the predator.

Mark

And the state of exception splits the country almost down the middle. What's driving that division?

Mimi

People trust targeted action—more police, longer sentences—because they can see it. But a state of exception is abstract. It means suspension of rights, and Chileans have lived through that before. They're cautious.

Mark

The Armed Forces helping Carabineros gets 76 percent support, but restricting freedom of movement only gets 49 percent. That's a huge gap.

Mimi

Exactly. People want the state to go after criminals aggressively. They don't want the state going after them. There's a clear line: act on the bad guys, don't constrain the rest of us.

Mark

Does this tell us anything about what Chileans actually fear?

Mimi

Yes. They're not afraid of police or military presence. They're afraid of crime itself, and they're willing to give authorities broad powers to fight it. But they're also wary of those powers being used on ordinary people.

Mark

So the government has a mandate here?

Mimi

On the specifics, absolutely. On the broader emergency powers, it's murkier. The government can point to these numbers and say people want action. But nearly half the country is uncomfortable with suspending normal rights, even temporarily.

  • El 88% de los encuestados respalda endurecer las penas para quienes recluten menores para delinquir, convirtiendo esta medida en el punto de mayor consenso del plan de seguridad.
  • La demanda por presencia policial permanente en los 50 barrios más conflictivos del país alcanza el 84%, reflejando una ciudadanía que exige respuestas visibles y sostenidas en los territorios más golpeados.
  • La opinión se fractura ante el estado de excepción: casi la mitad lo apoya y casi la otra mitad lo rechaza, evidenciando la tensión entre seguridad y garantías constitucionales.
  • Cuando las restricciones recaen sobre la población general —limitar la libertad de circulación o de reunión— el apoyo cae drásticamente, revelando que los chilenos distinguen entre perseguir al crimen y controlar a los ciudadanos.

En un momento en que Chile busca respuestas a la violencia organizada, una nueva encuesta revela que la ciudadanía respalda con fuerza las medidas que apuntan directamente a los victimarios, pero se muestra más cautelosa ante aquellas que restringen las libertades cotidianas de todos. El plan de seguridad del gobierno Kast encuentra terreno fértil en la opinión pública, aunque la línea entre proteger a la sociedad y limitar sus derechos sigue siendo un umbral que los chilenos no cruzan con facilidad.

Una encuesta Plaza Pública Cadem, realizada durante la primera semana de agosto, muestra que los chilenos respaldan con amplia mayoría las medidas de seguridad más concretas del gobierno Kast. La propuesta con mayor adhesión es el aumento de penas para quienes recluten menores de edad para cometer delitos, con un 88% de apoyo, una medida que parece resonar transversalmente porque apunta a quienes explotan a los niños, no a los niños mismos.

Con cifras igualmente altas, el 84% apoya mantener un despliegue policial permanente en los 50 barrios más críticos del país, y el 82% respalda criminalizar la pertenencia a organizaciones delictuales. A esto se suma que el 79% considera que la Constitución debería consagrar explícitamente la seguridad ciudadana como deber del Estado, lo que sugiere un apetito por compromisos formales, no solo administrativos.

Sin embargo, la unidad se quiebra frente al estado de excepción: un 49% lo apoya y un 44% lo rechaza. Aun así, cuando la encuesta profundiza en las facultades específicas que este otorgaría, el respaldo se recupera: el 76% aprueba que las Fuerzas Armadas apoyen a Carabineros en zonas focalizadas, y el 70% respalda la interceptación de telecomunicaciones en esas áreas.

El patrón es elocuente: los chilenos distinguen entre medidas que persiguen al crimen organizado y aquellas que restringen la vida de los ciudadanos comunes. Limitar la libertad de circulación obtiene solo un 49% de apoyo, y restringir la libertad de reunión apenas un 41%. La ciudadanía parece dispuesta a tolerar una acción policial y militar contundente, pero se detiene cuando las restricciones alcanzan a quienes no delinquen.

A new public opinion survey has revealed substantial citizen backing for a series of security measures proposed by the Kast administration. The Plaza Pública Cadem poll, conducted during the first week of August, shows Chileans broadly supportive of tougher criminal penalties and expanded police presence, though more divided on emergency powers.

The proposal drawing the strongest endorsement is a straightforward one: increase prison sentences for anyone who recruits minors to commit crimes. Eighty-eight percent of respondents favor this measure, making it the most popular item in the government's security package. The reasoning is intuitive—targeting the adults who exploit children rather than the children themselves—and it appears to resonate across the political spectrum.

Close behind, at 84 percent, is the idea of maintaining a permanent police deployment across the fifty most troubled neighborhoods in the country. This reflects a desire for visible, sustained law enforcement presence in areas where crime has taken root. A third major proposal—making membership in a criminal organization itself a crime, with enhanced penalties—garnered 82 percent support. These three measures form the core of what the government is calling its security agenda.

Beyond these specific initiatives, 79 percent of those surveyed agreed that the Constitution should explicitly state that protecting citizen security is a duty of the state. This suggests appetite for a more formal, constitutional commitment to public safety, not merely administrative promises.

Where opinion fractures is on the creation of a new state of exception—a temporary suspension of certain civil liberties during emergencies. The public is nearly evenly split: 49 percent in favor, 44 percent opposed. Yet when the survey drilled down into the specific powers such an exception might grant, support rebounded. Seventy-six percent approved allowing the Armed Forces to assist Carabineros in operations against organized crime in designated zones. Seventy percent backed intercepting telecommunications in those same areas. Support dropped when the measures became more restrictive of everyday life: 49 percent agreed with temporarily limiting freedom of movement in certain neighborhoods, and only 41 percent supported restricting freedom of assembly in specific sectors.

The pattern suggests Chileans distinguish between measures they see as targeting criminals directly—longer sentences, more police, military support—and those that constrain the movement and gathering rights of ordinary residents. They appear willing to accept significant police and military action, but hesitate when restrictions fall on the general population.

The survey also tracked President Kast's overall approval rating during the same period, though the full results on that measure were not detailed in the initial reporting. What is clear is that public appetite for action on security remains high, even as the specific tools to achieve it generate more nuanced debate.

El 88% de respaldo a aumentar penas para quienes recluten menores refleja consenso ciudadano sobre esta medida específica del plan de seguridad
— Encuesta Plaza Pública Cadem
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en BioBioChile ↗
Contáctanos FAQ