Doug Schoen: Democrats Win the 2026 Midterms, but Republicans' Collapse Is the Bigger Story

More a collapse of the Republican Party than an affirmative vote for Democrats
Schoen's central reading of Tuesday's midterm results, which he argues reflect rejection rather than endorsement.
Mark

Schoen says Democrats won, but he insists the bigger story is Republican collapse. Why draw that distinction?

Mimi

Because he reads the vote as a rejection, not an endorsement. He points to the Iran war, high gas prices tied to it, and a sense that the rules differ for elites and ordinary people.

Luke

Worth flagging that this is an opinion column. The causes he lists are his interpretation. The piece offers no polling or exit data showing why voters chose as they did.

Mark

The concrete result, though, is the Senate seats in South Carolina, Kansas and Texas.

Mimi

Yes, and he says those were considered virtually unachievable earlier in the year. That's the strongest fact in the column.

Luke

Also note he says some races remained uncalled. He calls the majorities solid, but he gives no seat counts, so the size of the margin isn't established here.

Mark

He names James Talarico and Troy Jackson. Why?

Mimi

They're his examples of progressives elected, and the basis for his question about whether Democrats can govern coherently.

Luke

His fear that Democrats will use investigations to cover their divisions is a prediction. Nothing in the column shows it has happened.

Mark

And the warning to both parties?

Mimi

Govern constructively or pay for it. He says the swing against Republicans could hit Democrats in two years.

  • Democrats are winning Senate seats in states that were supposed to be out of reach, and the result is still rippling through a tense night of uncalled races.
  • Voters are pushing back hard against the Iran war, gas prices that feel like its direct cost, and a two-tier system they believe protects the powerful.
  • The new Democratic majorities face a fracture between establishment moderates and progressive newcomers, with no clear plan yet for holding them together.
  • Republicans and the president are being urged to change course and govern across the aisle, or risk the same backlash that just hit them.
  • The outcome is not settled: the coming months will test whether either party can deliver on what voters demanded, and the voters may judge them again in two years.

On the morning after Election Day, a longtime pollster turned columnist reads the 2026 midterms not as a triumph for Democrats so much as the slow unraveling of Republican authority. Democrats have taken Senate seats in places like South Carolina, Kansas and Texas, ground long thought beyond their reach, and are poised to hold both chambers. The author locates the cause in a public weary of an unpopular war in Iran, punishing gas prices, and a sense that the rules bend for elites and not for working people. Whether this moment becomes a durable turn toward governing together, or merely a prelude to further gridlock, remains an open question that voters themselves have not yet answered.

Doug Schoen, writing the morning after Election Day, declares Democrats the night's big winners and President Trump its big loser. Though several races remained uncalled, he sees solid Democratic majorities forming in both the House and the Senate. The most surprising proof comes from Senate contests in South Carolina, Kansas and Texas, states Democrats had considered virtually unwinnable only months earlier.

Schoen argues that the result says more about Republican collapse than about Democratic appeal. Voters, he writes, were rejecting the Iran war as it has been waged, the high gas prices they tie to it, and a belief that government operates by one set of rules for elites and another for everyone else. Among the newly elected Democrats he names progressives such as James Talarico in Texas and Troy Jackson in Maine, and he questions whether a party pulling toward democratic socialism can govern coherently.

His deepest worry is that Democrats may paper over their internal split with investigations rather than policy, which would deepen the congressional paralysis of recent years. He sees an opening for Republicans to govern constructively, noting that voters rejected Trump's habit of demonizing opponents. The warning applies to both sides: the same anger that punished Republicans could return for Democrats in two years. Americans, he concludes, care less about partisan labels than about results, and his closing hope is that the public ends up the real winner, though he admits that outcome is far from certain.

Doug Schoen, writing for Fox News in an opinion column published the morning after Election Day, opens with a blunt verdict: the Democratic Party was the big winner of the 2026 midterms, and President Donald J. Trump was the big loser. He bases that on what he calls a blowout for Democrats in both the House and the Senate on Tuesday night.

Schoen notes that some races had not yet been called. Even so, he writes, it is clear that Democrats will hold solid majorities in both chambers of Congress. The most striking evidence he cites is in the Senate, where Democrats won seats in South Carolina, Kansas and Texas. Earlier in the year, he says, those states were considered virtually unachievable for the party.

But his central argument is about what the result means. In his reading, it is more a collapse of the Republican Party than an affirmative vote for Democrats. He lists three things voters were rejecting: the war in Iran as it is being conducted, high gas prices that voters see as a direct result of that war, and a widespread perception that government runs on two sets of rules, one for the rich and elites and another for ordinary working people.

The column then turns to what Schoen says is still unknown. Democrats elected a number of progressives, and he names James Talarico in Texas and Troy Jackson in Maine. He asks whether the party can govern coherently and consistently in the Senate, and to a lesser extent the House, with an agenda that is sympathetic to or aligned with democratic socialists. He also asks whether these Democrats can address the challenges that Republicans and Trump failed to resolve over the last two years.

He voices a specific fear. In his telling, Democrats may paper over the deep differences between their establishment wing and their far-left progressive wing not with policy but with investigations. If so, he warns, the paralysis already seen in Congress over the past two years would only become starker.

Schoen also sees an opening for Republicans and the president. They could try to govern constructively with Democrats, he writes, and voters have made clear that Trump's approach of demonizing the opposition is not an acceptable way to govern. That, he says, is why Trump is the night's biggest loser. He adds that Republicans need to respond responsibly to public concern about the Iran war, corruption and inflation, or they do so at their peril.

The warning cuts both ways. The same swing against Republicans, he argues, could hit Democrats in two short years if they do not heed the voters' judgment. Many Americans, he writes, see politics as a bloodsport, and what they said Tuesday is that they care less about partisan labels than about getting things done.

His closing hope is that the American people end up as the real winners going forward, though he says that is by no means certain. The things to watch are whether the new Democratic majorities can hold together across their internal divide, and whether either party shifts toward governing across the aisle.

Voters are making clear that Trump's approach of demonizing the opposition is not an acceptable way to govern (paraphrased).
— Doug Schoen, Fox News opinion column
Both parties should govern constructively or face consequences, and Democrats could suffer the same swing in two years (paraphrased).
— Doug Schoen, Fox News opinion column
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Fox News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ