In late October, a Detroit alt-weekly made a rare break with its own practice: it announced it would no longer seek comment from Mike Rogers' Senate campaign, having concluded that the Republican's attacks on Democratic rival Abdul El-Sayed had crossed from hard-fought politics into repeated falsehoods and attacks on his Muslim faith. The dispute turns on the familiar old contest over what a candidate's record can bear and what it cannot, and it arrives as a second, unresolved question about El-Sayed's family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood hangs over the Michigan race in its final weeks. Neith
Detroit Metro Times Drops Mike Rogers Comment Requests, Citing 'Lies and Bigoted Attacks' on El-Sayed
For the first time in its history, the paper stopped asking for comment
Why is a paper refusing to ask a campaign for comment such a big deal?
Because asking for comment is a basic ritual of fairness. The Metro Times says this is the first time in its history it has stopped doing it for a candidate.
What's the paper's stated reason?
Repeated lies and bigoted attacks aimed at El-Sayed's Muslim faith. Neavling cites the Muslim Brotherhood claim and the 9/11 line attributed to Hasan Piker, not El-Sayed.
Worth noting that's the paper's characterization, relayed through Fox. We have Neavling's account, not a ruling from a neutral party.
Did the campaign respond?
Neither the Rogers campaign nor the Metro Times answered Fox News Digital. The paper did say the campaign declined specific questions for its Oct. 8 report.
And that's the paper's description of what happened. We haven't heard the campaign's version of that exchange.
Is El-Sayed untouched in all this?
No. His "physician" label drew questions in July, and his half-sister's posts alleging family involvement with the Brotherhood surfaced last week.
Those posts are allegations on social media. The source doesn't say they've been verified, and it doesn't say how El-Sayed responded beyond his denial.
So what stays open?
Rogers' bin Laden role is called inflated by the paper, but the details of that dispute aren't laid out here. That's still unresolved.
Le Pouls
- A Detroit Metro Times reporter announced a first-ever policy: no more requests for comment from Mike Rogers' campaign, citing repeated lies and bigoted attacks.
- The paper says Rogers falsely claimed El-Sayed never disavowed the Muslim Brotherhood, even though El-Sayed answered a town hall question with an emphatic yes.
- Rogers' camp is accused of inflating his bin Laden operation credentials and of repeating an unfounded claim that El-Sayed took money from terrorist groups.
- A half-sister's social media allegations about family links to the Brotherhood have reopened scrutiny of El-Sayed's denials just as the race tightens.
- Neither the Rogers campaign nor the Metro Times has responded to Fox News Digital, leaving the standoff unresolved with weeks left before the vote.
In late October, a Detroit alt-weekly made a rare break with its own practice: it announced it would no longer seek comment from Mike Rogers' Senate campaign, having concluded that the Republican's attacks on Democratic rival Abdul El-Sayed had crossed from hard-fought politics into repeated falsehoods and attacks on his Muslim faith. The dispute turns on the familiar old contest over what a candidate's record can bear and what it cannot, and it arrives as a second, unresolved question about El-Sayed's family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood hangs over the Michigan race in its final weeks. Neither side has yet offered a full answer to the other.
On a Wednesday in October, Steve Neavling, an investigative reporter at the Detroit Metro Times, posted a notice on X that the alt-weekly had never issued before. For the first time in its history, the paper would stop seeking comment from a candidate's campaign. The reason, he wrote, was repeated lies and bigoted attacks. The candidate was Mike Rogers, the Republican running for U.S. Senate in Michigan, and the targets were the Muslim faith of his Democratic opponent, Abdul El-Sayed.
Neavling pointed to two claims in particular. Rogers had said El-Sayed has not disavowed the Muslim Brotherhood, yet at a recent town hall, when asked to denounce the group, El-Sayed had answered, "Sure, yeah, absolutely." Rogers had also suggested El-Sayed believes "America deserved 9/11," a remark that actually came from Hasan Piker, a streamer and prominent supporter, not from El-Sayed. The paper further accused Rogers of inflating his role in the bin Laden operation, and said his campaign, when questioned in early October, had declined to answer specifics and repeated an unfounded claim about terrorist funding.
The accompanying article catalogued Rogers' misrepresentations across public safety, women's health and the auto industry. It did not spare El-Sayed, who was previously questioned for calling himself a "physician" despite not being licensed to practice medicine. On autos, the Rogers campaign has said El-Sayed wants to ban gas-powered vehicles, though he supported Green New Deal clean energy goals without directly advocating such a ban, and Rogers himself once praised the Chevrolet Volt.
Neither the Rogers campaign nor the Metro Times replied to Fox News Digital. Meanwhile, El-Sayed has denied any family ties to the Brotherhood, but that denial was tested last week when his half-sister alleged on social media that relatives, including their mother, had been involved with the group. What remains open is whether Rogers answers the paper's charges and whether El-Sayed gives a fuller response to his half-sister's claims as the race enters its final weeks.
On Wednesday, Steve Neavling, an investigative reporter at the Detroit Metro Times, posted a notice on X that the alt-weekly had never issued before. For the first time in its history, he wrote, the paper would stop seeking comment from a candidate's campaign because of repeated lies and bigoted attacks. The candidate was Mike Rogers, the Republican running for the U.S. Senate in Michigan, whose campaign, Neavling said, keeps targeting the Muslim faith of his Democratic opponent, Abdul El-Sayed.
Neavling pointed to two claims in particular. The first was Rogers' assertion that El-Sayed has not disavowed the Muslim Brotherhood. According to Neavling, that is false: earlier in the week, when an audience member at a town hall asked El-Sayed to denounce the organization, he answered, "Sure, yeah, absolutely." The second was Rogers' suggestion that El-Sayed believes "America deserved 9/11." Neavling noted that the statement came from Hasan Piker, a left-wing streamer who is a prominent El-Sayed supporter, and not from El-Sayed himself.
The paper also accused Rogers of inflating his counterterrorism résumé, specifically his role in the operation targeting Osama bin Laden. Neavling wrote that when the Metro Times raised these claims for an Oct. 8 report, Rogers' campaign declined to answer specific questions. It defended his record instead, and repeated an unfounded allegation that El-Sayed received money from terrorist organizations.
Neavling's accompanying article set out to count the ways Rogers had misrepresented El-Sayed across a range of topics. Rogers has attacked El-Sayed, a physician and former Detroit health director, over public safety, women's health and Michigan's auto industry. Neavling wrote that Rogers' own record includes opposing additional police funding, backing proposed cuts to women's health services, and voting against measures meant to steer work to U.S. manufacturers.
The article did not treat El-Sayed's side as spotless. During the July Democratic primary, he was questioned about calling himself a "physician" when, although he holds a medical degree, he is not licensed to practice medicine.
On autos, Neavling wrote that the Rogers campaign has claimed El-Sayed wants to ban gas-powered vehicles. Bridge Michigan found that El-Sayed had supported the clean energy goals of the Green New Deal but had not directly advocated such a ban. At the July primary debate, he opposed an electric vehicle mandate and said Michigan should keep producing internal combustion engines while building out EV infrastructure. Neavling added that Rogers himself once framed the move away from gasoline as an opportunity for Michigan workers. In an August 2008 message to constituents, Rogers praised the Chevrolet Volt and described a future of "clean, green cars" running hundreds of miles without gasoline.
Fox News Digital reported that neither the Rogers campaign nor the Metro Times responded to its requests for comment. The story also sits beside a separate controversy for El-Sayed. He has denied that he or his family have any ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, but that denial came under scrutiny last week after social media posts surfaced in which his half-sister alleged that family members, including their mother, had been involved with the Islamist group.
What to watch is whether the Rogers campaign answers the Metro Times' charges, and whether the half-sister's claims draw a fuller response from El-Sayed as the Senate race heads into its final weeks.
Citations marquantes
For the first time in Metro Times history, we're no longer seeking comment from a candidate's campaign because of repeated lies and bigoted attacks.— Steve Neavling, Detroit Metro Times investigative reporter, on X