Cornell Faculty Senate Votes No Confidence in Leadership Amid Gang Rape Lawsuit

A former student alleges she was drugged and raped at a Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024; all seven accused men deny the allegations.
A symbolic gesture reflecting deep discontent on campus
Cornell's Faculty Senate voted 75-50 for no confidence, a measure with no binding power over leadership.
Mark

Why does a vote with no binding power matter?

Mimi

Because of who cast it. Seventy-five faculty senators put their names to a statement that the leadership has lost their trust, and the sponsors aimed it at the trustees, who do have authority.

Luke

And the trustees' chair has already answered. She said the vote reflects deep anger but that Kotlikoff is the right leader. So the immediate effect looks limited.

Mark

The resolution didn't ask him to resign. Why not?

Mimi

The reporting doesn't say why. What it says is that sponsors want sweeping reforms, and Packman called this only the beginning.

Luke

Right, and we shouldn't guess at their reasoning. We only know what the text did and didn't call for.

Mark

What is Kotlikoff's central argument?

Mimi

That replacing him wouldn't fix complex problems and could hurt Cornell's reputation. He also said he hadn't read the police report because policy bars administrators from interfering in criminal matters.

Luke

Worth keeping the allegations in proportion too. They come from a lawsuit. All seven men deny them, and the attorney general's review is still open, so none of this is a finding.

Mark

What would change the picture?

Mimi

The Yates report on how Cornell handled the 2024 report, and the attorney general's investigation.

Luke

Neither has a published date in this reporting, so what comes next is unknown.

  • A faculty senate has voted 75 to 50 to declare no confidence in President Michael Kotlikoff and other top leaders, with no power to remove them.
  • A former student's lawsuit alleges she was drugged and raped at a Chi Phi fraternity house, and the district attorney's first decision that no crime occurred is now being reopened.
  • Faculty and students say discipline was too weak and campus party culture too untouched, and hundreds have come forward saying the case is only the tip of the iceberg.
  • Kotlikoff asks for more time, warning that replacing him would not fix complex problems, while the trustees, Sally Yates's independent review, and the state attorney general's probe will decide what comes next.

On a Friday in November, Cornell University's faculty expressed a vote of no confidence in the leaders they had once trusted to guard the young people in their care. The symbolic resolution, passed 75 to 50, arose from a painful question that echoes across many campuses: whether an institution that promises safety can be trusted to deliver it when a former student says she was assaulted in a fraternity house in 2024. The men accused deny the allegations, and the outside inquiries are still unfolding, so the vote stands less as a verdict than as a sign of a community that no longer feels its answers are enough.

On Friday, Cornell University's Faculty Senate voted 75 to 50 to declare no confidence in its top leaders. The resolution carries no legal power, and it does not call for President Michael Kotlikoff to resign. But its backers hope it will push the Board of Trustees to confront failures they say have persisted for years.

The vote follows a lawsuit filed in September by a former student, identified in court documents as Jane Doe, against the university and seven former members of the Chi Phi fraternity. She says she was given ketamine and raped at the fraternity house in October 2024. All the men deny the allegations. A local district attorney first concluded no crime had occurred, but that decision has been reopened and handed to New York's attorney general.

Cornell's own Title IX investigation led to discipline for several accused men, including two expulsions and two suspensions, while others received lesser sanctions. Critics say that was not enough. Professor Paul Ortiz, a co-sponsor of the resolution, says hundreds of people have since come forward to describe similar experiences, breaking what he calls a fortress of silence.

Kotlikoff defended his record, pledged to make Cornell a leader on sexual assault, and warned that replacing him would not solve the problem. He said he had not read the police report, citing policy, and admitted he had only recently learned the woman had left Cornell. He left open sweeping restrictions on Greek life.

Board Chair Anne Smalling said the vote reflects deep anger on campus, and student Yasmeen Masoud said students should not have to beg to be heard. Co-sponsor Iris Packman called the vote only the beginning. The next chapter will be shaped by the Yates review and the attorney general's work.

On Friday, Cornell University's Faculty Senate voted 75-50 to declare no confidence in the school's top leaders. Five senators abstained and five others did not vote, according to an email sent to senators that afternoon. The resolution carries no power over the university's leadership, but its backers said they hoped it would press the Board of Trustees to confront institutional failures they say have gone on for years.

The vote came after weeks of argument among professors over whether President Michael Kotlikoff and other administrators handled a former student's allegations properly, and whether they have done enough to curb sexual misconduct on campus. The resolution did not call for Kotlikoff's resignation.

The dispute began in mid-September, when a former student, identified in court documents only as Jane Doe, sued the university and seven former members of the Chi Phi fraternity. She says she was given ketamine and raped at the fraternity house in October 2024. All of the men have denied the allegations, saying either that the sex was consensual or that they were not involved. The local district attorney first concluded that she had consented and that no crime had been committed. That investigation has since been reopened and handed to New York's attorney general.

Cornell's own Title IX investigation ran for months and ended in discipline for several of the accused. According to records obtained by The New York Times, two students were expelled and two were suspended and placed on probation. Two more were required to write reflection papers and complete bystander training. The seventh man had already graduated and was barred from campus. Kotlikoff also convened a task force on sexual misconduct, which released certain recommendations.

Some faculty say that was not enough. They have criticized Kotlikoff for not moving more forcefully to strengthen the disciplinary process, push for criminal investigations and change campus party culture. Paul Ortiz, a labor history professor and co-sponsor of the resolution, said last week that hundreds of students, staff, alumni and faculty had approached its sponsors to say the Jane Doe case is "but a tip of the iceberg." He said a "veritable fortress of silence" around sexual violence had been breached since the resolution was introduced.

Kotlikoff defended himself on the first day of the senate's debate. He pledged to make Cornell a leader in addressing sexual assault and asked for more time. Replacing him, he argued, would do little to solve complex problems and could damage the university's reputation. He acknowledged that he had not read the campus police report, saying university policy bars top administrators from interfering in criminal investigations. He rejected the suggestion that he had been indifferent to the woman's case, though he conceded he had only recently learned she had left Cornell. He said the university must determine whether fraternities can operate safely, left open the possibility of sweeping restrictions on Greek life, and said decisions should rest on research and evidence rather than emotion.

Some professors had urged waiting to vote until an independent investigation is released. Sally Yates, the former U.S. Deputy Attorney General, was hired by the university to examine how Cornell responded to the woman's initial report in 2024 and how it handles similar reports from other students.

Board of Trustees Chair Anne Smalling said the vote "reflects the deep anger across our campus" and signals that what happened to the woman was unacceptable. She added that Kotlikoff and his administration were the right leaders to address the issue "thoughtfully and comprehensively." Thomas Giuffra, the woman's attorney, said he hoped the vote would be another step toward educating and supporting the Cornell community.

Junior Yasmeen Masoud, speaking at a news conference organized by the resolution's sponsors, said students should not have to beg for answers or generate media attention to have their concerns acknowledged. Co-sponsor Iris Packman called the vote "only the beginning" and said faculty would push for sweeping reforms. What the trustees do next, along with the Yates findings and the attorney general's review, will shape what follows.

The vote reflects the deep anger across our campus, but Kotlikoff and his administration are the right leaders to address the issue.
— Anne Smalling, Board of Trustees Chair (paraphrased)
We should not have to beg for answers, demand basic transparency or generate media attention just to get our concerns acknowledged.
— Yasmeen Masoud, Cornell junior
Fale Conosco FAQ