Cornell Faculty Pass No-Confidence Resolution Over Handling of Fraternity Rape Allegations

A former Cornell student alleges she was drugged and gang raped at a Chi Phi fraternity house in October 2024; all accused men deny the allegations.
A symbolic vote with no power, aimed at the trustees who have it
Cornell's faculty senate cannot remove leaders, but sponsors hope the 75-50 vote pressures trustees.
Mark

Why does a vote that can't remove anyone matter?

Mimi

Because 75 senators put their names behind a statement of no confidence. The sponsors say the target is the trustees, who do hold power over the president.

Luke

Worth noting that it's symbolic, and it doesn't ask Kotlikoff to resign. So what it will actually produce is unknown.

Mark

What did Kotlikoff say in his defense?

Mimi

He said replacing him wouldn't fix complex problems and could hurt Cornell's reputation. He asked for time and said decisions should rest on evidence, not emotion.

Luke

He also admitted he hadn't read the campus police report. His explanation was a policy against interfering in criminal investigations.

Mark

And the discipline of the accused students?

Mimi

Two expelled, two suspended with probation, two assigned reflection papers and bystander training. A seventh had already graduated and was barred from campus.

Luke

Those details come from records The New York Times obtained, and the men deny the allegations. None of it has been tested in court.

Mark

What are people waiting on?

Mimi

Sally Yates's independent investigation, and the attorney general's reopened criminal probe.

Luke

Neither has a stated timeline in the reporting, so any prediction about leadership changes is guesswork.

  • Faculty delivered a 75-50 no-confidence vote against top leaders, including President Michael Kotlikoff, over a case that has shaken campus since September.
  • The vote holds no authority to remove anyone, so it is a pressure play aimed squarely at trustees who do.
  • A criminal case that was first closed as consensual has been reopened and handed to New York's attorney general.
  • Seven accused fraternity members deny the allegations, while Cornell's own discipline ranged from expulsions to reflection papers.
  • Sally Yates's independent review of Cornell's 2024 response hangs over the next move, and no one yet knows whether leadership will change.

In a quiet but pointed act of institutional conscience, Cornell University's faculty have withdrawn their confidence from the leaders who guided the school through a painful reckoning over a 2024 allegation of drugging and rape at a Chi Phi fraternity house. The vote, 75 to 50, carries no power to remove anyone and is aimed instead at the trustees who do hold that power. It reflects a familiar human pattern: when a community feels its formal processes have failed a survivor, its members reach for the few symbolic tools they have. Whether that gesture becomes a turning point will depend on what independent investigators and state prosecutors ultimately find.

Cornell University's Faculty Senate voted Friday to declare no confidence in its top leaders, passing the resolution 75 to 50 after more than a week of electronic voting. Five senators abstained and five did not vote. The vote grew out of a case that has unsettled the campus since mid-September, when a former student sued the university and seven former members of Chi Phi. She says she was given ketamine and raped at the fraternity house in October 2024. All the men deny it, some saying the sex was consensual and others saying they were never involved.

The criminal side has shifted as well. The local district attorney first concluded that no crime had occurred, but that investigation has since been reopened and handed to the state attorney general. Cornell's own Title IX process ended in discipline after months of work: two students were expelled, two were suspended and placed on probation, two were required to write reflection papers and complete bystander training, and a seventh, who had already graduated, was barred from campus.

President Michael Kotlikoff created a task force on sexual misconduct, and it has released some recommendations. Many faculty members, however, felt he had not acted forcefully enough, and they wanted tougher discipline, pressure for criminal inquiries, and changes to party culture. The senate cannot remove anyone. Its backers hope the resolution will push trustees to confront what they see as long-standing institutional failures. It does not call for Kotlikoff to resign.

Kotlikoff pledged to make Cornell a leader on sexual assault and asked for more time. He argued that replacing him would not solve complex problems and could damage the university. He admitted he had not read the campus police report, citing policy that bars administrators from interfering in criminal matters, and he said he had only recently learned the woman had left Cornell. He left open sweeping restrictions on Greek life, insisting the decision should rest on evidence rather than emotion.

Some professors urged patience until Sally Yates, the former U.S. Deputy Attorney General, finishes her independent review of how Cornell responded to the 2024 report and how it handles similar cases. Her findings and the attorney general's inquiry are what come next.

Cornell University's Faculty Senate voted Friday to declare no confidence in the school's top leaders. The resolution passed 75-50, with five senators abstaining and five others not voting, according to an email sent to senate members that afternoon. Voting was held electronically over more than a week, and the result was released on Friday.

The vote came out of a case that has unsettled the campus since mid-September. That month, a former student sued the university and seven former members of the Chi Phi fraternity. She says she was given ketamine and raped at the fraternity house in October 2024. All of the men have denied the allegations. Some say the sex was consensual, and others say they were not involved.

The criminal side of the case has shifted. The local district attorney first concluded that the woman had consented and that no crime had been committed. That investigation has since been reopened and handed to New York's attorney general.

Cornell's own process ended in discipline after a monthslong Title IX investigation, according to records obtained by The New York Times. Two of the accused students were expelled. Two received suspensions and probation. Two were required to write reflection papers and complete bystander training. A seventh man had already graduated and was barred from campus.

President Michael Kotlikoff also convened a task force on sexual misconduct, which has released some recommendations. Still, a number of faculty members are furious that he did not act more forcefully. They wanted a stronger disciplinary process, pressure for criminal investigations, and changes to campus party culture.

The senate has no authority over the president or other top administrators. Backers said they hoped the resolution would press Cornell's trustees to address what they see as longstanding institutional failures. Notably, it does not call for Kotlikoff to resign. Paul Ortiz, a labor history professor and co-sponsor, said hundreds of students, staff, alumni and faculty had approached the sponsors to say the Jane Doe case is "but a tip of the iceberg." He added that "a veritable fortress of silence has been breached" around sexual violence since the resolution was introduced.

Kotlikoff addressed senators on the first day of debate. He pledged to make Cornell a leader on sexual assault and asked for time to make more changes. He argued that replacing him would do little to solve complex problems and could harm the university's reputation. He acknowledged that he had not read the campus police report, saying policy bars top administrators from interfering in criminal investigations. He rejected the suggestion that he had been indifferent to her case, though he conceded he had only recently learned that she left Cornell.

He said the university must determine whether fraternities can operate safely, and he left open the possibility of sweeping restrictions on Greek life. Decisions, he said, should rest on research and evidence rather than emotion.

Some professors also counseled patience. They argued that the faculty should wait for the independent investigation by Sally Yates, the former U.S. Deputy Attorney General. Cornell hired her to examine how it responded to the woman's initial report in 2024 and how it handles similar reports from other students. Her findings and the attorney general's reopened inquiry are the next developments to watch.

The Jane Doe case is but a tip of the iceberg.
— Paul Ortiz, labor history professor and resolution co-sponsor
Kotlikoff asked for time to make more changes, arguing that replacing him would do little to solve complex problems.
— Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff, paraphrased
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en WTOP ↗
Contáctanos FAQ