Each year, thousands of professionals enter business schools carrying genuine ambitions — to lead, to build, to decide wisely — trusting that the institution will meet them halfway. Now, a voice from within that institution is asking whether it ever could. An educator who has taught inside MBA programs is calling not for their reform, but for their closure, arguing that the gap between what these programs promise and what they actually produce is not incidental but structural. It is a rare moment when a system is questioned not by those it excluded, but by one of its own architects.
Business School Insider Calls for Shutting Down MBA Programs
Students arrive with noble intentions, leave with flawed expertise
Mark
So this person is saying MBA programs should just shut down entirely? That seems like a pretty extreme position. What's the actual evidence she's pointing to?
Mimi
She's arguing that the gap between what students expect to learn and what they actually learn is so fundamental that it can't be fixed with curriculum changes. The expertise they're getting is flawed at its core.
Luke
But the source material here is really thin. We have the claim that students enter with good intentions and leave with flawed expertise, but we don't have specifics about what that flawed expertise actually is, or concrete examples of how it's failing them.
Mimi
That's fair. The piece is more of a philosophical argument than a detailed audit. She's saying the system itself is broken, not just that certain classes are poorly taught.
Mark
Does she offer any alternative? Like, if MBA programs shut down, what should replace them?
Mimi
The source material doesn't go into that. It's focused on the diagnosis, not the prescription.
Luke
And we should note—this is one educator's perspective. We don't have data on whether employers agree, whether students regret their degrees, or whether there's broader consensus that the programs are failing.
Mimi
Right. It's an insider critique, which gives it credibility in some ways, but it's still one person's view of a massive system.
Mark
What makes her position different from other critics of business education?
Mimi
She's not arguing for reform. She's arguing the whole thing should end. That's a different claim than saying MBA programs need better ethics courses or more practical training.
Luke
And we should be clear about what we actually know versus what we're inferring. We know she works in business education and she's critical of it. We know the programs are at major universities. But the specifics of her argument—what exactly is flawed, how it manifests, what the consequences are—those details aren't in what we have.
Il Polso
- An insider educator — not an outside critic — is publicly arguing that MBA programs should be shut down entirely, not merely reformed.
- The tension cuts deep: students arrive with constructive, even idealistic intentions, only to graduate with expertise she describes as fundamentally flawed and misleading.
- The critique targets the architecture itself — the case study method, the two-year structure, the theory-heavy curriculum — suggesting no amount of tinkering can fix what is broken at the foundation.
- Major institutions like Harvard, Cornell, and Cambridge face an implicit indictment, their prestige and tuition revenue suddenly cast as measures of a promise that may never be kept.
- The debate this ignites could accelerate already-growing pressure for alternative business education models, forcing a reckoning across an industry worth billions and built on a credential many have quietly doubted.
Each year, thousands of professionals enter business schools carrying genuine ambitions — to lead, to build, to decide wisely — trusting that the institution will meet them halfway. Now, a voice from within that institution is asking whether it ever could. An educator who has taught inside MBA programs is calling not for their reform, but for their closure, arguing that the gap between what these programs promise and what they actually produce is not incidental but structural. It is a rare moment when a system is questioned not by those it excluded, but by one of its own architects.
There is a moment on the first day of business school that deserves more scrutiny than it gets — a room full of people sitting down with genuine ambition, believing the degree ahead will prepare them to lead and decide well. According to an educator who has spent years inside these institutions, what follows is a slow erosion of that clarity into something far less useful.
This instructor has begun asking a question few in her position dare to raise publicly: whether the MBA, as currently structured, should exist at all. Her argument is not against business education in principle. It is against the specific form it takes — the curriculum, the pedagogy, the assumptions baked into what expertise is supposed to mean. Students arrive with constructive intentions, she contends, and leave with expertise that is fundamentally flawed. The gap between promise and delivery, in her view, is not a minor misalignment. It is systemic.
What gives the critique its particular force is its origin. Business schools have faced outside criticism before — from employers who find graduates impractical, from ethicists who question their moral curriculum, from economists skeptical of the return on investment. But this challenge comes from someone whose professional identity is bound to the institutions she is indicting. She is not calling for reform or a better syllabus. She is calling for closure.
The implications reach far. If the model itself — the two-year program, the case method, the emphasis on theory — is the problem, then no amount of incremental adjustment will resolve it. For the thousands currently enrolled, and for the universities that depend on these programs as both revenue and prestige, the argument is a direct confrontation: that the noble intentions students carry through the door are being systematically converted into something less honest, less capable, and less worthy of the cost.
There is a particular moment in the life of a business school student that rarely gets examined closely enough. It arrives on the first day of class, when a room full of people sit down with genuine ambition—to learn how to build something, to lead well, to make decisions that matter. They believe the degree they're about to pursue will equip them for that work. What happens next, according to someone who has spent years inside these institutions teaching them, is a slow erosion of that clarity into something far less useful.
An educator working within business schools has begun raising a question that few with her position are willing to ask publicly: whether the entire enterprise of the MBA, as currently structured, should continue to exist at all. Her argument is not that business education is unnecessary. It is that the particular form it takes—the curriculum, the pedagogy, the underlying assumptions about what expertise means—systematically fails to deliver on its implicit promise. Students arrive with intentions that are often genuinely constructive. They leave, she contends, with expertise that is fundamentally flawed.
This critique carries weight precisely because it comes from inside the system. It is not the complaint of a skeptic writing from outside academia, but rather someone embedded in the daily work of teaching at these institutions. She has watched the machinery operate from within. She has seen what gets taught, how it gets taught, and what students actually retain and carry into their professional lives. The gap between what these programs promise and what they deliver, in her assessment, is not a minor misalignment. It is systemic.
The traditional MBA has long occupied a particular place in American professional life—a credential that signals readiness for leadership, a two-year investment that supposedly transforms a person into a competent manager and strategist. The programs themselves are substantial enterprises. They charge significant tuition, attract talented applicants from around the world, and operate at major universities including Harvard, Cornell, and Cambridge. The prestige is real. The cost is real. The question this insider is raising is whether the actual learning that occurs justifies either.
What makes her argument particularly significant is its timing and its source. Business education has faced criticism before—from employers who say graduates lack practical skills, from ethicists who question whether these programs adequately address moral reasoning, from economists who debate whether the ROI actually pencils out. But those critiques typically come from outside. This one comes from someone whose professional identity is tied to the institutions she is questioning. She is not arguing that business schools should be reformed or improved. She is arguing they should close.
The implication of that position is substantial. If the MBA as currently constituted is producing graduates with inadequate or misleading expertise, then the problem is not peripheral. It is not a matter of tweaking the curriculum or hiring better professors. It suggests something more fundamental is broken in how these institutions conceive of what business education should be and how it should work. It raises the question of whether the model itself—the two-year program, the case study method, the emphasis on theory over practice—is salvageable or whether it has become an obstacle to actual learning.
For the thousands of students currently enrolled in MBA programs, and for the institutions that depend on them as a revenue source and a centerpiece of their academic mission, this argument represents a direct challenge. It is not a call for incremental change. It is a call to reckon with the possibility that the entire structure may be doing more harm than good—that the noble intentions with which students enter these programs are being systematized into something less useful, less honest, and less capable of preparing them for the actual work of leadership and decision-making in a complex world.
Citazioni salienti
Students come in with noble intentions and leave with flawed expertise— Business school educator
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su The New York Times ↗
Education