A new scientific statement from the American Heart Association illuminates a quiet but consequential failure: the medical system has long measured women's vascular health against a male template, leaving women with peripheral vascular disease underdiagnosed, undertreated, and more vulnerable to severe outcomes. Published in Circulation, the statement draws together research across multiple conditions—from peripheral artery disease to aortic aneurysms to rare autoimmune arteritides—to show that sex differences in symptoms, risk, and treatment response have been systematically overlooked. It is
AHA Statement: Gender Gaps in Peripheral Vascular Disease Hinder Women's Diagnosis and Care
Women with aortic disease rupture at smaller sizes than men
So this statement is saying women don't get diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease as often as men do. Is that because women actually get it less, or because doctors miss it?
Both things are happening. For some conditions like peripheral artery disease, men and women get it at similar rates overall. But women are more likely to have no symptoms or unusual symptoms that doctors don't recognize as PAD. So the disease is there, but it's invisible.
But we should be careful here—the statement says women are "more likely" to have atypical symptoms. That's based on research, but how robust is that research? Is this something we know from large, well-designed studies, or is it an observation from smaller samples?
That's a fair question. The statement is synthesizing current knowledge, which means some areas have stronger evidence than others. The disparities in outcomes—like mortality rates after surgery—those are documented in specific trials. But you're right that understanding why women present differently requires more research.
The aortic disease numbers are striking. Women three times more likely to rupture at the same size. How is that possible if they're supposedly protected by estrogen?
The protection from estrogen seems to prevent aneurysms from forming in the first place. But once they do form, women's aneurysms behave differently—they're more fragile, more likely to rupture. It's not that estrogen protects the aneurysm itself; it's that fewer women develop them. When they do, the disease is different.
And we should note: the statement recommends lower repair thresholds for women already—5.0 centimeters instead of 5.5. So the field has recognized this. The statement is saying those thresholds might still not be low enough, but that's an open question, not a settled fact.
What about the treatment gap? Women with PAD get fewer supervised exercise programs. Is that a resource problem, or are doctors not offering them?
The statement identifies it as a disparity but doesn't fully explain the mechanism. It could be that women aren't referred, or that they face barriers to access, or that guidelines aren't being followed equally. That's actually one of the things the statement says needs more attention—understanding why women don't get guideline-recommended care.
And that's important because it's different from a biological sex difference. That's a systems problem. If guidelines say women should get supervised exercise and they're not getting it, that's something hospitals and clinics can change right now, not something that requires more research.
The statement mentions Black women having higher lifetime risk of PAD but getting treatment less often. Is that a sex issue or a race issue?
It's both. The statement is focused on sex differences, but it notes that Black women have higher prevalence and lower treatment rates. That's a compounding disparity—being a woman with vascular disease plus being Black.
The statement cites the 2024 PAD guideline on this, so that's documented. But the statement itself doesn't dive deep into why that disparity exists. Is it access? Implicit bias? Underdiagnosis? The statement flags it but doesn't fully explain it, which is honest but also leaves a gap.
O Pulso
- Women with peripheral artery disease often present without classic symptoms or with atypical ones, making diagnosis elusive even as their functional decline quietly accelerates.
- Black women face a lifetime PAD risk of nearly 28 percent—far higher than white women—yet receive evidence-based treatment less frequently, compounding an already unequal burden.
- Women's aortic aneurysms rupture at smaller sizes and with greater lethality: in one major UK trial, women were three times more likely than men to rupture at the same vessel diameter, and 30 percent of their ruptures occurred in vessels under five centimeters.
- Across conditions like fibromuscular dysplasia, Takayasu arteritis, and chronic mesenteric ischemia, women are disproportionately affected yet disproportionately underserved by current clinical frameworks.
- The AHA is now calling for sex-disaggregated clinical trial data, clinician retraining on atypical presentations, and revised screening thresholds—concrete steps toward dismantling a system built on incomplete assumptions.
A new scientific statement from the American Heart Association illuminates a quiet but consequential failure: the medical system has long measured women's vascular health against a male template, leaving women with peripheral vascular disease underdiagnosed, undertreated, and more vulnerable to severe outcomes. Published in Circulation, the statement draws together research across multiple conditions—from peripheral artery disease to aortic aneurysms to rare autoimmune arteritides—to show that sex differences in symptoms, risk, and treatment response have been systematically overlooked. It is a reckoning not with a single disease, but with the assumptions embedded in how medicine has defined normalcy.
The American Heart Association released a scientific statement this week documenting a systemic pattern: women with peripheral vascular disease—conditions affecting blood vessels outside the heart—are consistently underdiagnosed, undertreated, and more likely to suffer severe complications than men with equivalent conditions. Published in Circulation, the statement synthesizes research across multiple vascular diseases and identifies how sex differences in presentation, risk factors, and outcomes have been mishandled or ignored.
Peripheral artery disease affects men and women at roughly equal rates, but women experience it differently. They are more likely to have no symptoms or atypical ones that clinicians fail to recognize. When symptoms do appear, women walk more slowly and cover shorter distances—a measurable functional decline that should prompt urgent care. Instead, women receive guideline-recommended treatments and supervised exercise programs less often than men. The disparity is sharpest for Black women, who face a lifetime PAD risk of 27.6 percent compared to 19 percent for white women, yet access evidence-based care less frequently.
Aortic disease tells an even starker story. Estrogen offers some protection against aneurysm formation, but when women do develop aneurysms, those vessels rupture more easily and at smaller sizes. In a major UK clinical trial, women were three times more likely than men to rupture at the same aneurysm diameter, and 30 percent of female ruptures occurred in vessels under five centimeters—compared to just 8 percent in men. Even after minimally invasive surgical repair, women face higher short- and long-term mortality and greater stroke risk. In acute aortic emergencies, in-hospital mortality reaches 30 percent for women versus 21 percent for men.
Other conditions follow similar patterns. Fibromuscular dysplasia occurs five to nine times more often in women. Takayasu arteritis strikes women five times more frequently and carries twice the mortality rate. Women with giant cell arteritis treated with prednisone alone are five times more likely to experience treatment failure than men on the same regimen.
Dr. Esther S.H. Kim, who chaired the writing group, noted that while awareness of sex differences in heart disease has grown, equivalent attention to vascular disease outside the heart remains scarce. The statement calls for greater female enrollment in clinical trials with sex-disaggregated analysis, clinician education on atypical presentations, and refined screening thresholds that reflect women's actual risk profiles. Whether these recommendations translate into changed practice—and ultimately into equitable outcomes—remains the open question.
The American Heart Association released a scientific statement this week documenting a troubling pattern: women with peripheral vascular disease—conditions that narrow or damage blood vessels outside the heart—are systematically underdiagnosed, undertreated, and more likely to suffer severe complications than men with the same conditions. The statement, published in Circulation, synthesizes current research across multiple types of vascular disease and identifies specific ways that sex differences in disease presentation, risk factors, and outcomes have been overlooked or mishandled by the medical system.
Peripheral artery disease, which restricts blood flow to the limbs, affects men and women at roughly equal rates overall. Yet women experience it differently. They are more likely to have no symptoms at all or to report atypical warning signs that doctors may not recognize as PAD. When symptoms do appear, women tend to walk more slowly and cover shorter distances than men with the same condition—a measure of functional decline that should prompt urgent intervention. Instead, women with PAD are less likely to receive treatments recommended by clinical guidelines or to be enrolled in supervised exercise programs that could improve their mobility and quality of life. The disparity is even starker for Black women, who have a lifetime risk of PAD of 27.6 percent compared to 19 percent for white women, yet receive evidence-based treatment less often.
Aortic disease presents an even more dramatic picture of delayed recognition and worse outcomes. Women tend to be diagnosed later in the course of their disease, when it has already progressed to a more severe stage. While estrogen offers some protective effect against certain aortic conditions like aneurysms, that protection comes with a hidden cost: when women do develop aneurysms, they rupture more easily and at smaller sizes. In a major clinical trial conducted in the United Kingdom, women were three times more likely than men to experience rupture at the same aneurysm size. Thirty percent of aneurysm ruptures in women occurred in vessels smaller than five centimeters, compared to just eight percent in men. Even when women undergo minimally invasive surgical repair, they face higher mortality rates in both the short and long term, plus an increased risk of stroke. In acute aortic emergencies—dissections, blood collections within the aortic wall, and penetrating ulcers—in-hospital mortality for women reaches 30 percent versus 21 percent for men.
Other vascular conditions show similarly stark sex-based patterns. Fibromuscular dysplasia, a condition that causes abnormal cell growth in artery walls, occurs five to nine times more often in women than men. Women are also three times more likely than men to develop chronic mesenteric ischemia, a reduction in blood flow to the intestines. Takayasu arteritis, an autoimmune inflammation of large arteries, strikes women five times more frequently than men and carries twice the mortality rate. Women with giant cell arteritis who receive only prednisone as treatment are five times more likely to experience treatment failure than men receiving the same therapy.
Dr. Esther S.H. Kim, chair of the writing group and director of the Center for Women's Cardiovascular Health at Atrium Health in Charlotte, North Carolina, emphasized that the problem extends beyond individual conditions. "Peripheral vascular disease is often under-recognized and understudied in women," she said. While cardiologists and patients have become increasingly aware of sex differences in heart disease, equivalent attention to blood vessel diseases outside the heart remains scarce. The result is a system that misses diagnoses, delays treatment, and leaves women with worse health outcomes than men.
The statement calls for concrete changes. Clinical trials need to enroll more women and analyze results separately by sex to understand whether treatments work differently for women than for men. Doctors need training to recognize atypical presentations of vascular disease in women. Screening guidelines need refinement to account for women's unique risk factors and disease patterns. Current thresholds for when to repair aortic aneurysms, for instance, are already lower for women than men, but the statement suggests even these may not fully capture women's actual risk. Most fundamentally, the medical system needs to remove barriers that prevent women from accessing treatments that guidelines already recommend.
The statement represents a shift in how the cardiovascular field thinks about sex differences—moving beyond the assumption that disease works the same way in everyone and toward recognition that biology, symptom presentation, and treatment response can vary significantly. Whether that recognition translates into changed practice, better outcomes, and equitable care remains to be seen.
Citações Notáveis
Peripheral vascular disease is often under-recognized and understudied in women. While differences in heart disease between men and women are increasingly recognized, equivalent focus on vascular diseases affecting blood vessels outside the heart remains lacking.— Dr. Esther S.H. Kim, chair of the writing group and director of the Center for Women's Cardiovascular Health at Atrium Health