More than 116,000 Zimbabweans, many of whom had spent years quietly rebuilding their lives across the border in South Africa, were pushed homeward in 2026 by the threat of xenophobic violence — only to arrive in the very economic conditions that had first driven them away. The ultimatum issued by anti-immigrant groups gave these men and women not a choice but a countdown, and the country receiving them back had neither the infrastructure nor the resources to absorb their return. What unfolds now is a familiar human story: displacement does not end at the border, and belonging must be rebuilt t
Zimbabwean returnees face economic hardship as xenophobia forces exodus from South Africa
They are coming back to a country where there are no jobs
Why did so many Zimbabweans leave South Africa so suddenly? Was the June 30 deadline actually enforced?
The deadline came from activist groups, not the government. But the threat was real enough—homes were being raided, people were being warned to leave. When you're undocumented and scared, you don't wait to see if it's official.
Right, but the South African government explicitly said June 30 would be a normal day. So we're talking about a threat that worked without being backed by state power. That's worth noting.
And now these people are back in Zimbabwe. Are they getting help?
Some. The government registered over 116,000 returnees and assisted about 37,000 with transport. But once they're home, the support drops off. There are no jobs waiting for them.
The government says it's screening returnees and considering vocational training and business grants. But "considering" is not the same as delivering. We don't know yet if those programs actually exist or how many people they'll reach.
So what's actually working?
Churches are doing a lot—shelter, food, transport, training in carpentry and welding. And some returnees, like Sidney Bunya, are using skills they learned abroad to start their own businesses.
But that's survival, not reintegration. Bunya had savings and tools. Most people don't. The activists call for grants and agricultural support, but we don't see evidence those are being distributed at scale.
What happens to someone like Samantha Chimbuya?
She's stuck. No job, no grant, relying on family. Her husband is still in South Africa, also struggling. She applied for business support and got nothing.
And we don't know how many people are in her situation versus Bunya's. The numbers tell us how many returned, but not how many are actually rebuilding versus how many are just surviving.
O Pulso
- Anti-immigrant activists in South Africa set a June 30 deadline for undocumented migrants to leave, creating a climate of raids and fear that made daily life untenable for tens of thousands of Zimbabweans.
- Over 116,000 Zimbabweans crossed back into their home country, many self-funded, arriving with few prospects and confronting the same unemployment and fragile social systems that had originally pushed them to emigrate.
- Government reintegration efforts — skills screening, reintegration centres, plans to recruit returning teachers — remain largely aspirational, leaving returnees in a limbo between announcement and action.
- Churches and civil society organizations have stepped in with shelter, food, transport, and vocational training, but advocates warn these stopgap measures cannot substitute for structured, long-term government support.
- A small number of returnees, like a carpenter who shipped his tools home and now employs five people, are forging paths forward using skills built abroad — but their stories are the exception, not the rule.
More than 116,000 Zimbabweans, many of whom had spent years quietly rebuilding their lives across the border in South Africa, were pushed homeward in 2026 by the threat of xenophobic violence — only to arrive in the very economic conditions that had first driven them away. The ultimatum issued by anti-immigrant groups gave these men and women not a choice but a countdown, and the country receiving them back had neither the infrastructure nor the resources to absorb their return. What unfolds now is a familiar human story: displacement does not end at the border, and belonging must be rebuilt twice.
Samantha Chimbuya had spent seven years building a life in South Africa — work, schooling for her children, access to food and healthcare. Then, in the spring of 2026, anti-immigrant activists set a deadline: all undocumented migrants must leave by June 30. Though the South African government rejected the ultimatum, the threat was real. Chimbuya watched homes being raided and warnings being issued. She packed her things and returned to Hurungwe in northern Zimbabwe before the deadline arrived. "It was not safe any more," she said. "It was scary."
She was far from alone. By late July, Zimbabwe had registered 116,670 returnees from South Africa — nearly 80,000 of whom had paid their own way home. More than 38,000 had already registered seeking employment. Back in Zimbabwe, Chimbuya found the same scarcity that had driven her away years earlier. Work was scarce, her husband remained in South Africa, and a government grant she had applied for to start a small business had not materialized. Reverend Useni Sibanda of the Zimbabwe Christian Alliance captured the bind plainly: these were people returning to a country with few jobs and social safety nets too thin to hold them.
Some returnees managed to convert their time abroad into a foothold at home. Sidney Bunya had left Zimbabwe in 2020 out of economic desperation, eventually mastering carpentry in Port Elizabeth. When permit raids intensified at his workplace in 2026, he shipped his tools home and started a carpentry business in Zvimba. It now employs five people. But Bunya's trajectory was uncommon.
The government announced plans to screen returnees for skills, establish reintegration centres, and encourage companies to hire qualified workers — but these remained plans. Churches filled the immediate gap with shelter, food, and vocational training in welding, carpentry, and computing. Still, human rights advocates called for something more deliberate: small grants, agricultural inputs, and machinery to help returnees establish durable livelihoods. The fear that drove people across the border had been swift. The work of rebuilding what came after was proving far slower, and far less certain.
Samantha Chimbuya had spent seven years building something in South Africa. She had work. Her children attended school. She could buy food and access healthcare. Then, in the spring of 2026, that life became unsafe.
Anti-immigrant activists in South Africa, operating under the banner of groups like March and March, had set a deadline: June 30. By that date, they demanded, all undocumented migrants must leave. The activists blamed migrants for taking jobs and straining public services. The South African government rejected the ultimatum, calling June 30 an ordinary day and warning against violence and intimidation. But the threat was real enough. Chimbuya, then 30 years old and living in KwaZulu-Natal, watched as homes were raided, as warnings were issued. She packed her belongings and returned to Zimbabwe, to Hurungwe in the north, before the deadline arrived.
"It was not safe any more," she told Al Jazeera. "They were raiding our homes, warning us to leave. It was scary."
Chimbuya was one of thousands who made that choice. By late July, the Zimbabwean government had registered 116,670 returnees from South Africa. Of those, 36,940 had been assisted by the state; 79,730 had paid their own way home. Another 38,057 had already registered seeking employment. The numbers were staggering. What was less visible was what came next.
Back in Zimbabwe, Chimbuya confronted the very conditions that had driven her away seven years earlier. Work was scarce. She relied on family and friends for money. Her husband remained in South Africa, also struggling. She had applied for a government grant to start a small business. Nothing came through. Reverend Useni Sibanda, who leads the Zimbabwe Christian Alliance, described the bind clearly: returnees had spent years abroad, often without investing in homes or property at home, and they were arriving in a country with few jobs and fragile social safety nets. "They are coming back to a country where there are no jobs and where the social support systems may not be enough to accommodate them," he said.
Some returnees found a way forward by leveraging skills they had acquired abroad. Sidney Bunya had left Zimbabwe in March 2020, driven by economic desperation. He worked various jobs in Johannesburg before settling in Port Elizabeth, where a cousin introduced him to professional carpenters. Over time, he became skilled in roof trusses and secured substantial contracts. But in 2026, permit raids intensified at his workplace. Employers grew reluctant to hire him. He bought carpentry tools, shipped them home, and left before the June 30 deadline. Using his savings, he started a carpentry business in Zvimba, northeast of Harare. It now supports his family and employs five people. "It was difficult to set up the business," he said. "But I am getting more jobs now."
Bunya's path was not typical. The government announced it was screening returnees to identify their skills and needs, establishing reintegration centres, and considering recruiting qualified teachers among those who had returned. Companies were being encouraged to hire skilled workers. Vocational training and business support were under consideration. But these were plans, not yet reality.
Churches had stepped into the gap, providing shelter, food, and transport. Ray Motsi, president of the Theological College of Zimbabwe, said churches had partnered with local businesses to offer training in welding, carpentry, and computer science. But the need far exceeded what these institutions could provide. Motsi criticized the government for insufficient support, calling for "a deliberate programme to reintegrate these people." Rashweat Mukundu, a human rights activist in Harare, was more specific: returnees needed small grants, agricultural inputs, and machinery to establish livelihoods. The challenge, he said, was not simply getting Zimbabweans across the border but ensuring they could remain economically stable once they arrived. "I plan to open a grocery store," one returnee told him, "but funding is a challenge."
The exodus from South Africa had been swift and driven by fear. The reintegration into Zimbabwe was proving far slower, and the outcome remained uncertain.
Citações Notáveis
It was not safe any more. They were raiding our homes, warning us to leave. It was scary.— Samantha Chimbuya, a 30-year-old returnee
They are coming back to a country where there are no jobs and where the social support systems may not be enough to accommodate them.— Reverend Useni Sibanda, Zimbabwe Christian Alliance