As Russian missiles struck hospitals, schools, and homes across Ukraine, President Zelenskyy found himself fighting a second battle — not on the front lines, but in the court of American opinion. Accused by Donald Trump of prolonging the war, Zelenskyy countered that it is Moscow, not Kyiv, that refuses to stop fighting, even as Washington quietly eased sanctions on Russia and left Ukraine without the intelligence warnings that might have softened the latest blows. What is unfolding is an old and painful pattern: the nation bearing the heaviest cost of a conflict finding itself blamed for its
Zelenskyy Counters Trump: Putin, Not Ukraine, Blocking Peace
Putin does not want the end of this war, or even any de-escalation
So Zelenskyy is saying the U.S. is cutting off intelligence and slowing down Starshield. How solid is that claim?
He's made it public, and Ukraine's top diplomat in Washington says they haven't gotten confirmation from the Pentagon or SpaceX that the service has been restored. That's a real gap—no denial, just silence.
But the Pentagon flatly denies changing intelligence policy. And Rubio says Starlink speeds were slowed but have been restored. The question is whether Zelenskyy is right that it was deliberate, or whether it was a technical glitch that's now fixed.
What about the claim that the Pentagon is delaying vital supplies?
Zelenskyy mentioned it but didn't specify what supplies or provide details. That's a serious accusation without a lot of public evidence behind it yet.
Exactly. It's an allegation, not a confirmed fact. We know he said it. We don't know what he's referring to or whether the Pentagon would agree with his characterization.
And Trump's argument—that Zelenskyy doesn't want peace?
Zelenskyy says Ukraine has taken every diplomatic opening. But Trump's point is that Ukraine's position has weakened over time, so maybe accepting a deal now is better than holding out.
That's a strategic argument, not a factual one. What we can verify is that Putin proposed a summit without Ukraine, and that Russia keeps attacking Ukrainian infrastructure even after Trump announced an "energy ceasefire" that neither Russia nor Ukraine actually agreed to.
So who's actually blocking peace?
That depends on what you mean by peace. If it means Ukraine giving up territory and sovereignty, then yes, Zelenskyy is blocking it. If it means Russia stopping attacks and withdrawing, then Russia is blocking it.
And that's the real story—there's no shared definition of what peace looks like, so both sides can claim the other is refusing it.
Le Pouls
- Russian missiles and drones struck Ukrainian clinics, schools, metro stations, and apartment buildings overnight — and Ukraine says no American intelligence warning arrived before the attack.
- Trump publicly accused Zelenskyy of not wanting peace, framing Ukraine's devastation — lost territory, decimated male population — as the consequence of its own leader's stubbornness.
- Zelenskyy fired back with specific charges: the U.S. is blocking Starshield satellite access and delaying critical weapons shipments, crippling Ukraine's ability to intercept Russian drones.
- The Pentagon denied any policy change, but Secretary Rubio's explanation for Starlink slowdowns — 'it sort of happened' — satisfied no one, and Ukraine's Washington envoy says nothing has been confirmed as restored.
- Trump has already rolled back bipartisan Russia sanctions to lower U.S. gas prices, a move Zelenskyy calls surrender dressed as pragmatism.
- Putin has proposed a U.S.-China-Russia summit that excludes Ukraine entirely, and Kyiv warns that any deal negotiated without them is no peace deal at all.
As Russian missiles struck hospitals, schools, and homes across Ukraine, President Zelenskyy found himself fighting a second battle — not on the front lines, but in the court of American opinion. Accused by Donald Trump of prolonging the war, Zelenskyy countered that it is Moscow, not Kyiv, that refuses to stop fighting, even as Washington quietly eased sanctions on Russia and left Ukraine without the intelligence warnings that might have softened the latest blows. What is unfolding is an old and painful pattern: the nation bearing the heaviest cost of a conflict finding itself blamed for its own suffering, while the architects of that suffering are invited to the negotiating table without it.
On Monday, Zelenskyy pushed back against Trump's claim that Ukraine was the obstacle to peace. The night before, Russian missiles and drones had struck energy infrastructure, a medical clinic, a school, a metro station, and apartment buildings — and Ukraine says no American intelligence warning came before the attack.
The public quarrel had been building for days. Trump posted on Truth Social that Zelenskyy "doesn't want to end this war," pointing to lost territory and a decimated male population as evidence of failed leadership. Zelenskyy's response was direct: Ukraine had taken every diplomatic opening offered to it. The refusal to de-escalate was Moscow's, not Kyiv's.
Behind the rhetoric lay concrete grievances. Zelenskyy accused the Trump administration of cutting off intelligence flows and blocking access to Starshield, the upgraded satellite system designed to help Ukraine shoot down Russian drones. The Pentagon denied any policy change. Secretary of State Rubio said any Starlink slowdown "wasn't deliberate" and offered the puzzling explanation that it "sort of happened" before being restored — though Ukraine's envoy in Washington said no confirmation of restoration had been received from the Pentagon or SpaceX.
The dispute unfolded against Trump's broader Russia pivot. Over the previous month, the president had rolled back bipartisan sanctions on Moscow, citing the goal of lowering U.S. gas prices. Zelenskyy saw it plainly: easing pressure on Russia while restricting Ukraine's access to weapons and intelligence was not pragmatism — it was capitulation.
Meanwhile, Putin was maneuvering on his own terms. The Kremlin signaled openness to U.S. mediation, but proposed a summit involving only the United States, China, and Russia — with Ukraine excluded entirely. Kyiv's foreign minister warned that such a gathering would only embolden Putin to keep fighting. Any peace negotiated without Ukraine, Ukraine made clear, would not be peace it could accept.
What had crystallized was a three-way standoff: Trump pressing for a quick resolution while rewarding Russia; Zelenskyy insisting American pressure on Ukraine was undermining its survival; and Putin willing to talk, but only on terms that erased Kyiv from the room. After four and a half years of war, the only thing accelerating was the diplomatic unraveling.
On Monday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pushed back hard against accusations from Donald Trump that Ukraine was the obstacle to peace. The previous night, Russian missiles and drones had struck again—hitting energy infrastructure, a medical clinic, a school, a metro station, and apartment buildings across the country. What made it worse, Zelenskyy said, was that the warning never came. No alert from American intelligence. No heads-up from partners who were supposed to have his back.
The tension between Zelenskyy and Trump had been building for days. Over the weekend, Trump had posted on Truth Social that Zelenskyy "doesn't want to end this war, and probably never did." Trump argued that Ukraine's leader could have negotiated better two years ago, that the country was now in ruins, that territory was lost, and that the male population had been decimated. It was a brutal framing—one that cast the Ukrainian president as either unwilling or incapable of making peace. But Zelenskyy's response was direct: Ukraine had taken every diplomatic opening its partners offered. The problem was not Kyiv's reluctance. It was Moscow's refusal to stop fighting.
Behind the public quarrel lay a more concrete grievance. Zelenskyy had accused the Trump administration of throttling the flow of intelligence to Ukraine and delaying critical military supplies. He specifically cited problems with Starshield, an upgraded version of Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system designed to help Ukrainian forces shoot down Russian drones. On Saturday, Zelenskyy said Ukraine still could not access Starshield. He also claimed the Pentagon was holding up shipments of vital equipment, though he did not detail which supplies or why.
The Trump administration denied the charges. A senior Pentagon official told CBS News there had been "no change" to intelligence sharing policy. Secretary of State Marco Rubio was more evasive. When asked if the U.S. was responsible for slowdowns in Starlink service, he said he was "not sure Zelenskyy knows what he's talking about," but that any reduction "wasn't deliberate." He then offered a cryptic explanation: "The United States—nobody ordered that Starlink speed to be slowed down. It sort of happened, but my understanding is it's been restored." He did not explain what "it sort of happened" meant. Ukraine's top diplomat in Washington, Denys Sienik, said the country had received no response from the Pentagon or SpaceX confirming that speeds had been restored or that Starshield was working as before.
The backdrop to this dispute was Trump's broader shift in Russia policy. Over the previous month, the president had rolled back sanctions on Moscow that had enjoyed bipartisan support in Congress. The stated goal was to lower U.S. gas prices by allowing Russian energy sales to resume. Zelenskyy saw it differently. He argued that easing pressure on Russia while cutting off Ukraine's access to intelligence and weapons was a form of surrender disguised as pragmatism. "When the supply of missiles to Ukrainian air defense is blocked, and Russia receives a weakening or postponement of sanctions, this is, unfortunately, a denial of reality from partners," he said.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin was playing a different game. Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow welcomed U.S. mediation efforts. But there was a catch: Russia wanted to negotiate without Ukraine at the table. The Wall Street Journal had reported that Putin proposed a summit involving only the United States, China, and Russia to discuss solutions to the war. The meeting would exclude Kyiv entirely. Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha warned that such a trilateral gathering would only encourage Putin to keep fighting. The message was clear: any peace deal negotiated without Ukraine's participation would not be a peace deal Ukraine would accept.
What had emerged was a three-way standoff. Trump was pushing for a quick resolution and had begun rewarding Russia with sanctions relief. Zelenskyy insisted that Russia was the one refusing to de-escalate, and that American pressure on Ukraine—through intelligence cutoffs and supply delays—was undermining his country's ability to defend itself. And Putin was signaling he would negotiate, but only on terms that excluded the country being invaded. The war that had raged for four and a half years showed no signs of ending. The only thing accelerating was the diplomatic breakdown.
Citations marquantes
Ukraine never wanted this war. We took positively literally every attempt of partners to end this war with dignity.— Zelenskyy, in response to Trump's accusation
The United States—nobody ordered that Starlink speed to be slowed down. It sort of happened, but my understanding is it's been restored.— Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on Starlink service disruptions