Younger Americans Less Worried About Political Violence and Free Speech Threats, AP-NORC Poll Finds

State Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot to death in June, Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded, and Charlie Kirk was fatally shot in September while speaking at Utah Valley University.
Younger adults see the threats too, but worry less about who they fall on
The poll found no age gap on free speech threats, but a wide one on concern for liberals and conservatives.
Mark

The headline is that younger people worry less about political violence. Why is that notable?

Mimi

Because they've grown up in the same climate as everyone else. About 3 in 10 under 30 are highly concerned, versus about half of those 60 and older.

Luke

Notable, yes, but the poll doesn't say why. DiGiovine's Kent State memory is one person's explanation, not a finding.

Mark

And on free speech there's a twist?

Mimi

Yes. About half of adults see a major threat to free speech, and age makes no difference there. Younger adults just worry less about its effect on liberals or conservatives.

Luke

That reading is the pollsters' interpretation. The data show the pattern; the reason is inferred.

Mark

What about the partisan split?

Mimi

About 6 in 10 Republicans worry about violence against conservatives, and about 6 in 10 Democrats about violence against liberals. The other side's worry is lower, at 27% and 38%.

Luke

Worth remembering the sample is 1,289 adults with a margin of 3.8 points, so subgroup numbers, like those under 30, carry wider uncertainty than that headline figure.

Mark

Anderson's comment seems to cut against the trend.

Mimi

He's 23 and worried, and he links it to young people struggling. But he's one voice.

Luke

Right. His view is an anecdote, not evidence that young people lean toward extreme action.

  • Roughly four in ten Americans are highly worried about political violence, and the fear is anything but shared evenly across the country.
  • Adults 60 and older are twice as alarmed as those under 30, with about half of the older group highly concerned against about three in ten of the young.
  • Partisans mostly fear violence against their own side: about six in ten Republicans and six in ten Democrats focus their dread on allies, not opponents.
  • Half of all adults see a major threat to free speech and four in ten to the press, yet Democrats and Republicans name very different threats.
  • The divide between generations and parties is widening, leaving the country to decide how to respond to violence it sees through separate lenses.

In the autumn of 2025, a poll from the AP-NORC Center found that Americans are uneasy about political violence, but unevenly so, with worry shaped as much by age and party as by events themselves. The unease follows a year marked by the June killings of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband and the September shooting of activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University. Roughly four in ten adults are highly concerned about violence aimed at either side, yet older Americans and partisans look at the same threats and see very different dangers. The findings suggest that how a nation feels about its own fragility depends largely on where one stands in life and in politics.

Ryan Striker, a 34-year-old music teacher in Manchester, New Hampshire, worries that political violence can snowball. He is liberal but politically independent, and he opposes President Donald Trump. His unease is one of many captured in a new Associated Press-NORC poll, which finds Americans uneasy about political violence, but not equally so. Age and party shape how much.

The poll follows a year of killings. In June, Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot dead in their home, and state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded. In September, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot dead while speaking on the campus of Utah Valley University. Authorities called both attacks acts of political violence.

Overall, 44% of adults are highly concerned about violence aimed at conservatives, and 41% about violence aimed at liberals. Among adults 60 and older, about half are highly concerned about violence against either side. Among those under 30, about three in ten are.

Tony DiGiovine, a 74-year-old Phoenix musician and retired electrical engineer, frames his worry in history. He remembers Kent State, where National Guard troops killed unarmed students protesting the Vietnam War in 1970. The Guard, he says, is not trained to patrol American streets, and something is going to go wrong.

Half of adults see a major threat to free speech, and there is no age divide on that point. Partisanship, however, splits sharply. About two-thirds of Democrats see a major threat to speech and the press, compared with about three in ten Republicans on speech and about two in ten on the press. Jeff Milligan, a 72-year-old Republican from Logan, Ohio, once worried more about threats to fundamental rights. Asked what changed, he answered plainly: Trump was elected.

The poll surveyed 1,289 adults from October 9 to 13 using NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel. The margin of sampling error for all adults is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

Ryan Striker, a 34-year-old music teacher in Manchester, New Hampshire, says he worries about political violence because it can snowball. He is liberal but politically independent, and he opposes President Donald Trump. His concern is one of many captured in a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research, which finds that Americans are uneasy about political violence, but not evenly so. Age and party shape how much.

The poll arrives after a year marked by killings. In June, Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot to death in their home, and state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded. The Justice Department described the attack as the shooter's calculated plan to inflict fear and violence upon Minnesota elected officials and their families. In September, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot dead while addressing an audience on the campus of Utah Valley University, which authorities also called an act of political violence.

Overall, 44% of U.S. adults say they are extremely or very concerned about political violence aimed at conservative figures or organizations. For violence aimed at liberal figures and groups, the share is 41%. The generational split is wide. About half of adults 60 and older are highly concerned about violence against either side, compared with about 3 in 10 adults under 30.

Tony DiGiovine, a 74-year-old Phoenix musician, retired electrical engineer and Democrat, put his worry in historical terms. He remembers Kent State, where the National Guard shot and killed unarmed students protesting the Vietnam War in 1970. The Guard, he said, is not trained to patrol American streets, and neither are the armed forces. In his words, something is going to go wrong.

A similar age pattern shows up on free speech for liberals and conservatives. Around 4 in 10 adults overall are highly concerned about threats to either group's speech. Among those 60 and older, about half are highly concerned about threats to conservatives' speech, while about a quarter of those under 30 say so. The gap is smaller, though still substantial, for liberals.

Yet when asked about fundamental rights directly, young and old agree on one thing. About half of adults see a major threat to freedom of speech, and there is no age divide on that. The finding suggests younger adults do think speech is threatened but are less personally worried about what it means for liberals or conservatives. About 4 in 10 see a major threat to freedom of the press, and about 3 in 10 say so for the right to vote and the right to keep and bear arms. On voting, age matters again: about 2 in 10 under 30 see a major threat, against about 4 in 10 of those 60 and older. Craig Tenhoff, a 58-year-old independent from Simi Valley, California, said it is concerning that people seem to be reaching a point of no longer talking or compromising and of vilifying opponents.

Party is the other great divider. About 6 in 10 Republicans are highly concerned about violence against conservatives, but only 27% say the same about violence against liberals. About 6 in 10 Democrats are highly concerned about violence against liberals, while 38% are about violence against conservatives. The effect is stronger at the ideological poles: conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats are much likelier than moderates in their coalitions to worry about their own side. About a quarter of independents are highly concerned about violence in either direction.

Max Anderson, a 23-year-old liberal-leaning independent and college student in Fort Collins, Colorado, worries about violence from across the spectrum. He said many people his age are not doing well, and so more extreme avenues of action can suddenly seem like a better option.

Party also divides perceptions of rights. About two-thirds of Democrats say free speech and freedom of the press face a major threat, compared with about 3 in 10 Republicans for speech and about 2 in 10 for the press. Jeff Milligan, a 72-year-old Republican from Logan, Ohio, who worries more about violence against conservatives, used to be more concerned about threats to fundamental rights. What changed? In his words: Trump was elected.

The poll surveyed 1,289 adults from Oct. 9 to 13, using NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, designed to represent the U.S. population. The margin of sampling error for adults overall is plus or minus 3.8 percentage points.

I remember Kent State. I was around then. The National Guard really isn't trained to patrol our streets.
— Tony DiGiovine, 74, Phoenix Democrat
Anytime political violence happens, it seems like it can be a snowball effect.
— Ryan Striker, 34, Manchester, New Hampshire
Contáctanos FAQ