In the autumn of 2025, an AP-NORC poll of 1,289 Americans offered a quiet mirror to a nation unsettled by two political killings this year, the shooting of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband in June and the death of activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September. What the survey reveals is less a single fear than a divided way of seeing: age shapes how deeply Americans feel the threat, and party determines whose safety they think of first. Older Americans, many of whom carry memories of earlier eras of unrest, worry far more than the young, while each side tends t
Younger Americans Less Worried About Political Violence and Free Speech Threats, AP-NORC Poll Finds
Concern depends on age, and even more on which side you're on
The headline is that younger people worry less about political violence. Why is that surprising?
Because the killings this year, Charlie Kirk in September and Melissa Hortman in June, were so visible. You'd expect the shock to land evenly. Instead about half of people 60 and older are highly concerned, versus about 3 in 10 under 30.
Careful, though. The poll measures concern, not experience or risk. It doesn't tell us why the gap exists.
Tony DiGiovine brought up Kent State. Is memory the explanation?
It's a vivid example of an older person's frame of reference. He said he was around then, and he worries about troops on the streets.
It's one man's account. The poll doesn't test memory as a cause, so we can't say that's what drives the age gap.
What about free speech? Do younger people care less?
Not on the basic question. Roughly half of adults of every age see a major threat to free speech. They're just less personally worried about how it affects liberals or conservatives specifically.
And that reading is the pollsters' interpretation. It's a reasonable one, but the data show the pattern rather than the motive.
Max Anderson said extreme options can feel like a better option to people his age. Does that fit?
He's describing his sense of his peers, as a 23-year-old. It's a voice, not a finding.
Right. And the sample is 1,289 adults with a margin of error of 3.8 points, so subgroup numbers like the under-30s carry more uncertainty than the overall figures.
Le Pouls
- Two political shootings this year have pushed fears of violence into the center of American public life.
- Nearly half of adults over 60 are deeply alarmed, while fewer than a third of those under 30 share that alarm.
- Republicans and Democrats each fix their concern on violence against their own side, leaving the other side's suffering in a blind spot.
- Partisan divides over free speech and the press run so wide that the country hears two different accounts of the same threat.
- Nothing in the poll settles the question, and the gaps between generations and parties remain open as tensions continue.
In the autumn of 2025, an AP-NORC poll of 1,289 Americans offered a quiet mirror to a nation unsettled by two political killings this year, the shooting of Minnesota lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband in June and the death of activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September. What the survey reveals is less a single fear than a divided way of seeing: age shapes how deeply Americans feel the threat, and party determines whose safety they think of first. Older Americans, many of whom carry memories of earlier eras of unrest, worry far more than the young, while each side tends to see violence most clearly when it lands on its own people.
Tony DiGiovine, a 74-year-old retired electrical engineer and musician in Phoenix, still remembers Kent State, where National Guard troops killed unarmed students in 1970. Today he fears that the armed forces are not trained to patrol American streets, and he told pollsters that something is going to go wrong. He is a Democrat, and he belongs to the age group most anxious about where the country is headed.
A new AP-NORC poll measures how far that anxiety depends on age. It was taken against the backdrop of two killings this year: in June, Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot dead in their home, and state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded. In September, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot dead while speaking on the campus of Utah Valley University. Authorities called both attacks political violence.
About 44% of adults are highly concerned about violence aimed at conservatives, and 41% feel the same about violence aimed at liberals. Among adults 60 and older, about half are highly worried, while among those under 30 it is about 3 in 10. Free speech follows a similar pattern, though younger adults see threats to speech without feeling the same personal stake.
Party shapes the picture as much as age. About 6 in 10 Republicans worry about violence against conservatives, but only 27% worry about violence against liberals. Democrats show the mirror image. Independents are largely quieter, with about a quarter highly concerned in either direction. Jeff Milligan, a 72-year-old Republican from Logan, Ohio, says his worry about threats to fundamental rights has eased since President Trump was elected. Others, like Max Anderson, a 23-year-old college student in Fort Collins, Colorado, worry about violence from every direction and see young people struggling in ways that make extreme action feel tempting.
The poll, drawn from 1,289 adults between Oct. 9 and 13, shows a country where each side watches its own wounds most closely. That pattern is what to watch as tensions continue.
Tony DiGiovine, a 74-year-old retired electrical engineer and musician in Phoenix, says he remembers Kent State. He was around then. In 1970, the National Guard shot and killed unarmed students protesting the Vietnam War there, and he has not forgotten it. Today he worries that troops and armed forces aren't trained to patrol American streets. "Something's going to go wrong," he told pollsters. He is a Democrat, and he belongs to the age group most anxious about where the country is headed.
A new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research shows how much that anxiety depends on age. It was conducted against the backdrop of two killings this year. In June, Minnesota state lawmaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were shot to death in their home, and state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were wounded. The Justice Department described the attack as the shooter's calculated plan to inflict fear and violence on Minnesota elected officials and their families. In September, conservative activist Charlie Kirk was shot dead while speaking to an audience on the campus of Utah Valley University, which authorities also called political violence.
Overall, 44% of U.S. adults are extremely or very concerned about political violence aimed at conservative figures or organizations, and 41% say the same about violence aimed at liberal ones. The generational gap is large. About half of adults 60 and older are highly concerned about violence against either side, compared with about 3 in 10 adults under 30. A similar pattern holds for free speech. About half of those 60 and older are highly concerned about threats to conservatives' free speech, against roughly a quarter of those under 30, and the gap is smaller but still substantial for liberals.
On which fundamental rights are under threat, the poll found about half of adults see a major threat to freedom of speech and about 4 in 10 say so about freedom of the press. About 3 in 10 see significant threats to the right to vote and the right to keep and bear arms. On speech, there was no age divide. The pollsters read that as a sign that younger adults do think speech is threatened, but are less personally concerned than older adults about how it affects liberals or conservatives. On voting, the gap returns: only about 2 in 10 adults under 30 see a major threat, compared with about 4 in 10 of those 60 and older.
Party matters as much as age. About 6 in 10 Republicans are highly concerned about violence against conservative figures or groups, but only 27% feel that way about violence against liberal ones. About 6 in 10 Democrats are highly concerned about violence against liberals, while 38% are about violence against conservatives. The pattern is sharper at the ends of the spectrum, where conservative Republicans and liberal Democrats are much likelier than moderates in their parties to worry about their own side. About a quarter of independents are highly concerned about violence in either direction.
The partisan split on rights is just as wide. About two-thirds of Democrats say freedom of speech and freedom of the press face a major threat. Only about 3 in 10 Republicans say that of speech, and about 2 in 10 of the press. Jeff Milligan, a 72-year-old Republican from Logan, Ohio, is more concerned about violence against conservatives than against liberals. He used to worry more about threats to fundamental rights than he does now. Asked what changed, he answered: "President Trump was elected."
Others voiced worry in different terms. Ryan Striker, a 34-year-old music teacher in Manchester, New Hampshire, who is liberal, politically independent and opposes Trump, said political violence can have a snowball effect. Craig Tenhoff, a 58-year-old independent from Simi Valley, California, said it is concerning that people seem to be reaching the point of no longer talking or compromising and of vilifying opponents. Max Anderson, a 23-year-old liberal-leaning independent and college student in Fort Collins, Colorado, worries about violence from across the spectrum. He said many people his age aren't doing well, and that more extreme avenues of action can start to feel like a better option.
The poll surveyed 1,289 adults from Oct. 9 to 13, drawn from NORC's probability-based AmeriSpeak Panel, with a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.8 percentage points for adults overall. The pattern to watch is that each party's worry is concentrated on its own side.
Citations marquantes
I remember Kent State. I was around then. Something's going to go wrong.— Tony DiGiovine, 74, Phoenix Democrat
Milligan said what changed his view on threats to fundamental rights was that President Trump was elected.— Jeff Milligan, 72, Republican from Logan, Ohio