Xiaomi Watch 2 Pro review: Wear OS promise undermined by poor tracking accuracy

Good battery life doesn't matter if the data is unreliable
The Watch 2 Pro excels at power management but fails at the core function of tracking fitness accurately.
Mark

Why does a watch with dual-frequency GPS—a feature usually reserved for expensive sports watches—perform so poorly compared to basic single-band GPS?

Mimi

Xiaomi has the hardware, but the implementation matters enormously. It's like having a high-end camera lens on a phone with poor computational photography. The specs don't translate to real-world performance without the software and calibration to back them up.

Mark

The heart rate tracking misses intensity shifts by 5 to 7 beats per minute. Is that actually a problem for most people?

Mimi

It depends what you're using the watch for. If you're casually checking your heart rate, you won't notice. But if you're training by zones—which is the whole point of interval work—being off by that much means you're training in the wrong zone entirely. The watch becomes unreliable as a training tool.

Mark

The body composition readings fluctuate by 3 percent day to day. Why would Xiaomi include a feature that's this inaccurate?

Mimi

It's a spec-sheet feature. It sounds impressive, and it differentiates the watch from competitors. But the underlying bioimpedance technology is sensitive to hydration, time of day, and dozens of other variables. Without proper calibration and user education, it's more marketing than utility.

Mark

The watch is uncomfortable to wear during exercise because of its weight distribution. Couldn't that be fixed with a different strap?

Mimi

Possibly, but that's asking the customer to solve a design problem. And even then, you're adding cost and complexity. Google learned this lesson with the Pixel Watch 1 and switched to aluminum for the Pixel Watch 2. Xiaomi chose stainless steel anyway.

Mark

The software is buggy—frozen screens, unresponsive apps. Are these things that could be fixed with an update?

Mimi

Some of them, sure. But the fundamental issue is that Xiaomi didn't fully commit to Wear OS. They layered their own interface on top, which creates complexity and fragmentation. A proper update would require rethinking that entire approach, and there's no sign that's coming.

Mark

Battery life is genuinely good—two to three days. Does that redeem the watch in any way?

Mimi

It's the one thing Xiaomi got right. But good battery life doesn't matter if the data you're collecting is unreliable. You're just carrying a more accurate clock.

  • Priced aggressively at £230, the Watch 2 Pro positions itself as a gateway to premium Wear OS features, yet its compromised software skin and buggy companion app undercut the very ecosystem it promises to unlock.
  • Heart rate monitoring misses intensity spikes by 5–7 BPM, GPS drifts 100–200 meters from gold-standard benchmarks, and body composition readings swing by as much as 3% between consecutive measurements — failures that strike at the core purpose of a fitness watch.
  • At 54.5 grams with poorly distributed weight, the device slips during workouts and disturbs sleep, echoing the same ergonomic misstep that haunted the original Pixel Watch.
  • Battery life stands as the watch's lone unambiguous victory, delivering two to three days of use and charging fully in under 40 minutes — a bright spot surrounded by persistent frustration.
  • The Watch 2 Pro lands in an uncomfortable middle ground: too expensive to forgive its flaws, too flawed to justify its ambitions, leaving fitness-focused buyers better served by more polished Wear OS rivals.

In the crowded arena of wearable technology, Xiaomi's Watch 2 Pro enters as a promising contender — affordable, well-built, and finally bearing the full weight of Google's Wear OS ecosystem. Yet the watch reveals a timeless tension in consumer technology: that specifications on paper and lived experience on the wrist are rarely the same story. Tested against the demands of real workouts and daily life in early 2024, the device stumbles where it matters most — accuracy, comfort, and software cohesion — reminding us that a tool's value lies not in what it promises, but in what it reliably delivers.

Xiaomi's Watch 2 Pro arrives with a spec sheet designed to impress — dual-frequency GPS, 65-hour battery life, body composition analysis, and access to Google's full app ecosystem, all for £230. On paper, it undercuts the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6, TicWatch Pro 5, and Google Pixel Watch 2 while matching or exceeding their headline features. In practice, weeks of real-world testing tell a different story.

The hardware itself is solid. A 47.6mm stainless steel case houses a sharp 1.43-inch AMOLED display that performs well in most lighting conditions. But the watch's 54.5-gram frame distributes its weight poorly, causing it to slip during exercise and feel unnatural during sleep — a familiar problem for heavy steel-cased watches paired with silicone straps.

Xiaomi's choice to layer its own MIUI skin over Wear OS rather than adopt the platform cleanly produces a fractured experience. Google Wallet, Maps, and Assistant are finally present on a Xiaomi device, but the interface feels unfinished. The watch has frozen on charging screens, apps have gone unresponsive, and small annoyances accumulate — the always-on display won't deactivate during sleep without a manual schedule, and accessing live workout data requires an awkward tap on a tiny icon. The Mi Fitness app frequently withholds data from daily view entirely.

The tracking failures are the most damaging. During interval sessions, heart rate readings ran 5–7 BPM below a Garmin and chest strap combination. GPS accuracy, despite dual-frequency hardware, drifted 100–200 meters from Garmin's measurements. One workout logged an elevation loss equivalent to three Mount Everests. Body composition readings fluctuated by up to 3% between back-to-back measurements, compared to consistent results from Fitbit and Garmin scales. Sleep tracking covers the basics but lacks depth, and its data presentation in Mi Fitness remains buggy.

Battery life is the watch's clearest strength — two to three days of real use, with a full charge completed in roughly 40 minutes. It's a genuine achievement, but it cannot carry a device undermined by inaccurate sensors and unpolished software. The Watch 2 Pro sits in an uncomfortable position: not affordable enough to excuse its shortcomings, not refined enough to compete with what Samsung and Google currently offer.

Xiaomi's Watch 2 Pro arrives with an impressive spec sheet and a competitive price that should make it an obvious choice for anyone seeking a Wear OS smartwatch. The device costs £230 for the standard model and £280 for the cellular version—undercutting the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 at £319, the TicWatch Pro 5 at £329, and the Google Pixel Watch 2 at £349. On paper, it has everything: dual-frequency GPS typically found in expensive sports watches, a promised 65-hour battery life, body composition analysis, and finally, access to Google's full ecosystem of apps and services. After weeks of real-world testing, though, the Watch 2 Pro proves that a smartwatch is far more than the sum of its specifications.

The device itself feels substantial in hand. Its 47.6mm stainless steel case houses a 1.43-inch AMOLED display with 466 x 466 pixels, delivering brightness and clarity that rarely require adjustment beyond 75 percent. The build quality is genuinely solid, and the minimalist design, while generic, avoids the awkward choices that plague some competitors. But this is where the praise largely ends. The watch weighs 54.5 grams, and that weight is distributed in a way that makes it uncomfortable to wear during exercise. During testing, the device required constant tightening to prevent slipping, and wearing it to bed felt unnatural. The problem mirrors what plagued the original Pixel Watch—a heavy stainless steel case paired with a silicone strap creates an imbalance that no amount of engineering elsewhere can fix.

Xiaomi's decision to layer its own MIUI interface on top of Wear OS rather than adopt the platform wholesale creates a fractured experience. Yes, you finally get Google Wallet, Maps, Assistant, and Home on a Xiaomi watch. But the customized skin feels unpolished and buggy. The device has frozen on charging screens, apps have become unresponsive, and basic features lack refinement. The always-on display, for instance, won't turn off automatically when you fall asleep—you must either set a manual schedule or live with a glowing watch face in the dark. Viewing live workout data requires keeping your wrist raised and tapping a tiny icon at the top of the screen, a clunky interaction compared to the Pixel Watch 2 or TicWatch Pro 5. The Mi Fitness companion app compounds these frustrations, often displaying data only in weekly view rather than daily, or failing to show it at all.

The tracking accuracy issues are severe enough to undermine the entire premise of a fitness watch. Heart rate monitoring struggles dramatically with intensity changes. During interval workouts, the Watch 2 Pro registered average heart rates 5 to 7 beats per minute below what a Garmin Epix Pro and Wahoo Tickr X chest strap recorded. In one session, it missed an entire chunk of exercise data during sync. The GPS tracking, despite the promise of dual-frequency GNSS, typically calculates 100 to 200 meters off from Garmin's gold-standard measurements—roughly what you'd expect from a basic single-band GPS. One bugged workout recorded elevation loss at 21,500 millimeters, equivalent to stacking three Mount Everests. The body composition analysis, a relatively unique feature that measures body fat percentage, water weight, and muscle mass, fluctuates wildly. Consecutive readings showed body fat percentages varying by as much as 3 percent, with some days registering around 20.9 percent and others 18.6 percent, compared to consistent readings of 14.7 percent on a Fitbit scale and 15.1 percent on a Garmin scale.

Sleep tracking performs adequately for basic metrics—fall asleep and wake times, rough sleep stage estimation—but lacks the depth you'd expect from a Wear OS device. The presentation in Mi Fitness is buggy, refusing to show daily views of tracked sleep. Resting heart rate and skin temperature readings are generally reliable, though Xiaomi disables many health features by default, requiring manual activation.

The one genuine bright spot is battery life. The Watch 2 Pro comfortably manages two days on a single charge, and closer to three if you leave Xiaomi's default settings untouched. An hour of dual-frequency GPS tracking drains roughly 15 to 20 percent of the battery, extending to 20 to 25 percent if you stream music simultaneously. The watch charges from empty to full in approximately 40 minutes, beating Xiaomi's own claim of 45 minutes.

The Watch 2 Pro occupies an awkward middle ground. It's cheaper than its direct competitors, but not cheap enough to excuse the tracking failures and software roughness. It promises Wear OS integration but delivers a compromised version that feels less polished than what Samsung and Google offer. For someone willing to accept significant accuracy limitations and software quirks in exchange for a larger watch face and Google services, it remains an option. For anyone who actually wants their fitness watch to track fitness accurately, it falls short of the current Wear OS standard.

The Watch 2 Pro is unable to register changes in intensity during intervals, leading to average heart rate readings 5–7 BPM below other test devices
— Testing results
Body fat percentage readings fluctuate between 18.6% and 20.9% on consecutive days, compared to consistent readings of 14.7% on a Fitbit scale
— Testing results
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Wareable ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti