In New Delhi, where ancient rivalries and modern ambitions converge, Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived for the 18th BRICS summit — his first step onto Indian soil in seven years — as the world's fractures made the gathering both more urgent and more fraught. The visit marks a cautious thaw between two nuclear powers still haunted by a deadly border clash, even as wars in Ukraine and the Middle East cast long shadows over a bloc that was built to reshape global order but must first reckon with its own divisions. Whether eleven nations can find common cause amid deep mistrust and competing in
Xi arrives in India for BRICS summit amid geopolitical tensions
You cannot build up forces on a border and claim you want deeper ties.
So Xi is in India for the first time since 2019. That's significant, right? What changed?
The 2020 border clash was brutal—soldiers died. For six years they've been slowly rebuilding: flights, visas, diplomatic contacts. This visit is the biggest gesture yet that they're willing to talk.
But the border dispute is still unresolved, and both sides have heavy military deployments there. How much can a visit actually change that?
It probably won't resolve it. They're looking for what they call an "early and substantial harvest"—which sounds like code for modest progress.
What about the other countries at the summit? Russia and Iran are there too. Does BRICS actually function as a bloc?
That's the real question. They created BRICS in 2009 to challenge Western dominance, but now they're divided by the Ukraine war, the Middle East conflict, energy crises.
India is buying Russian oil despite U.S. pressure. So BRICS members have competing interests with the West and with each other.
Can they find common ground on anything?
Possibly on energy security and trade. But the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East are expected to dominate—and those are exactly the issues where they disagree most.
So the summit might just expose how divided they are rather than show unity.
What does Xi's presence actually accomplish then?
It signals that China and India are willing to keep talking despite everything. Whether that translates into real cooperation is still unknown.
Le Pouls
- Xi's arrival in New Delhi is the most visible sign yet of a fragile diplomatic warming between China and India, two nuclear-armed neighbors whose soldiers clashed fatally just six years ago along a 2,175-mile disputed Himalayan frontier.
- Beneath the diplomatic choreography, the tensions are barely contained — Tibetan exiles protested in the streets, trade deficits widen, and both nations continue massing military forces along the very border their leaders claim to be resolving.
- Wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have hijacked the summit's agenda, forcing leaders from Russia, Iran, and India into the same room to navigate energy crises and geopolitical fires that none of them can extinguish alone.
- India finds itself pulled in opposing directions — buying Russian oil to survive an energy crisis while Western allies demand it distance itself from Moscow, embodying the impossible balancing act BRICS itself must perform.
- Xi and Modi are set to meet face-to-face, seeking what officials carefully call an 'early and substantial harvest' on border disputes — language that signals modest hopes rather than historic breakthroughs.
In New Delhi, where ancient rivalries and modern ambitions converge, Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived for the 18th BRICS summit — his first step onto Indian soil in seven years — as the world's fractures made the gathering both more urgent and more fraught. The visit marks a cautious thaw between two nuclear powers still haunted by a deadly border clash, even as wars in Ukraine and the Middle East cast long shadows over a bloc that was built to reshape global order but must first reckon with its own divisions. Whether eleven nations can find common cause amid deep mistrust and competing interests may reveal something essential about whether a post-Western world order is possible — or merely aspirational.
Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in New Delhi on Saturday for the 18th BRICS summit, his first visit to India in seven years and the most tangible sign yet of a cautious warming between two nations whose relationship had fractured badly. He came at the invitation of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accompanied by senior officials, as leaders from Russia and Iran also converged on the Indian capital — eleven nations in total, gathered to navigate a world torn by active wars, energy crises, and the slow erosion of Western economic dominance.
The weight of history hung over the visit. In 2020, Chinese and Indian soldiers had clashed along their disputed Himalayan border, a high-altitude frontier neither side has ever fully resolved. Since then, small gestures — restored flights, renewed visas, careful diplomatic contacts — had inched the two countries closer. Yet substantial military forces remained deployed on both sides, and a widening trade deficit and deep strategic rivalry complicated every overture. University of Melbourne scholar Pradeep Taneja captured the contradiction plainly: you cannot simultaneously build up forces on a contested border and claim to want deeper ties. Both leaders spoke of an 'early and substantial harvest' on the border question — language that suggested managed expectations rather than any real breakthrough. In the streets of New Delhi, Tibetan exiles had already made their feelings known, protesting Xi's arrival with placards.
The summit itself was overshadowed by conflicts no single bloc could resolve. Russia's Vladimir Putin had arrived a day earlier and reaffirmed his 'special' relationship with Modi. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian also met with the Indian leader, who used the occasion to stress the importance of freedom of navigation — a pointed reference to dangers in the Persian Gulf. India's own position illustrated BRICS's central dilemma: the country had turned to Russia for oil and gas to weather the energy crisis, resisting Western pressure to isolate Moscow over Ukraine, pulled simultaneously toward strategic partnership and economic necessity.
BRICS, founded in 2009 to give major emerging economies a greater voice against Western-dominated institutions, now faced its most consequential test. Whether Xi and Modi's face-to-face talks could yield genuine common ground on their border dispute — or merely an agreement to manage their differences — would signal something larger: whether this bloc could function as a real counterweight to Western influence, or whether it remained, at its core, a collection of nations with fundamentally diverging priorities.
Chinese President Xi Jinping landed in New Delhi on Saturday for the 18th BRICS summit, marking his first visit to India in seven years and the most visible sign yet of a tentative warming between two nuclear-armed nations whose relationship had fractured badly. He arrived at the invitation of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, accompanied by Foreign Minister Wang Yi and senior Communist Party official Cai Qi. The summit would bring together the leaders of Russia and Iran as well—eleven nations in total, all gathered to navigate a world fractured by active wars, energy crises, and the slow erosion of Western economic dominance.
The timing was heavy with symbolism and constraint. Six years earlier, in 2020, Chinese and Indian soldiers had clashed along their disputed border in Tibet, a high-altitude frontier stretching roughly 2,175 miles that neither side has ever fully resolved. Since then, the two countries had inched toward each other through small gestures: restored flights, renewed visa access, careful diplomatic contacts. Yet the underlying territorial dispute remained unresolved, and both nations maintained substantial military forces along the border, a fact that underscored how fragile the thaw actually was. Pradeep Taneja, a China-India specialist at the University of Melbourne, captured the contradiction plainly: you cannot simultaneously build up your forces on a contested border and claim you want to deepen economic and people-to-people ties. The two leaders were hoping for what officials called an "early and substantial harvest" on the border question—language that suggested modest expectations rather than breakthrough.
Deep mistrust persisted beneath the diplomatic choreography. A widening trade deficit, strategic rivalry in Asia, and the unresolved territorial question all complicated the relationship. In New Delhi on Friday, dozens of Tibetan exiles, including their spiritual leader the Dalai Lama, had protested Xi's arrival, holding placards against the visit. Beijing had responded by saying it was "ready to work with India" through strengthened communication and cooperation, a formulation that acknowledged tensions without naming them directly.
The summit itself was shadowed by conflicts that no single bloc could resolve. Wars in Ukraine and the Middle East dominated the agenda, along with the energy security crisis those wars had created. Russia's Vladimir Putin had already arrived in the capital and held talks with Modi on Friday, reaffirming what both countries called their "special" relationship. Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian had also arrived, and Modi used their meeting to emphasize the importance of protecting freedom of navigation and the safety of ships' crews—a pointed reference to the dangers posed by the U.S.-Iran conflict in the Persian Gulf.
India's own position illustrated the bind that BRICS faced. The country had navigated the energy crisis partly by turning to Russia for oil and gas, a move that required careful balancing. Washington and other Western capitals had pressured India to distance itself from Moscow over the Ukraine invasion, yet India's energy needs and its strategic partnership with Russia pulled in the opposite direction. BRICS itself, created in 2009 as a forum for major emerging economies seeking greater influence in institutions dominated by the West, now faced a test of whether it could forge unified positions on these crises or whether competing national interests would fracture it from within.
Xi and Modi were scheduled to hold face-to-face talks later on Saturday, according to India's Ministry of External Affairs. What emerged from those conversations—whether the two sides could find common ground on their border dispute, or whether they would simply agree to manage their differences—would signal whether BRICS could function as a genuine counterweight to Western influence or remained, fundamentally, a collection of nations with diverging priorities.
Citations marquantes
You cannot have a buildup of your forces on the border and at the same time say we should continue to have people-to-people relations and economic relationships.— Pradeep Taneja, China-India expert at University of Melbourne