For generations, a condition that plunges people into suicidal despair for days each month went unnamed, misdiagnosed, and dismissed — not by accident, but within a medical culture shaped by centuries of indifference to women's bodies. Laura Elizabeth Woollett's memoir Hell Days, drawing on her own diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder and years of research, places one person's suffering inside a much larger story: of contraceptive politics, medical misogyny, and the dangerous vacuum that pseudoscience rushes to fill when medicine fails. PMDD received formal psychiatric recognition only
Woollett's PMDD Memoir Exposes Medical Gaps and Wellness Misinformation
For some of the month, some of us are living in hell.
Why does it matter that PMDD was only officially recognized as a diagnosis in 2013? People were suffering before that, weren't they?
Absolutely. But without official recognition, there was no framework for diagnosis, no research funding, no treatment protocols. People were being told it was all in their head, or they were given antidepressants for depression that wasn't actually depression. Woollett herself lived through years of that.
Though we should be careful here—official recognition in the DSM-5 is one thing, but Eisenlohr-Moul points out the criteria are still restrictive. People whose symptoms don't completely resolve don't qualify. So even now, diagnosis is a gatekeeping problem.
Woollett's own experience with the pill nearly killed her. So how do we square that with the fact that the pill is often the treatment?
That's the whole tension of the book. The pill can work. It worked for Woollett eventually, with a different formulation. But the side effects are real, and they're not always caught or believed. Her doctors didn't take seriously the possibility that the pill caused her kidney failure.
And that's where the history matters—the pill was tested on women in Puerto Rico under conditions that would never be allowed now. That legacy of not taking women's health seriously, of experimenting on marginalized women, it doesn't just disappear. It shapes how doctors listen to women today.
What about the cycle-syncing thing? Is that just nonsense, or is there something real underneath it?
It's appealing because people want control. They want a solution that doesn't require medication or medical systems that have failed them. But the science behind it is thin, and the people selling it are profiting from desperation.
The numbers Woollett cites are striking—hundreds of millions of views on social media. That's not a small phenomenon. It suggests people are looking for answers somewhere, and they're not finding them in medicine.
So what's the way forward?
Woollett doesn't offer a simple answer, which is honest. Better diagnosis, better research, better listening to patients. And acknowledging that medication has real risks alongside real benefits.
And maybe also: stop treating women's health as something that can be solved by wellness influencers or by dismissing it as hysteria. It's a medical problem that requires actual medicine and actual research.
Der Puls
- People with PMDD are seven times more likely to attempt suicide, yet the condition went unrecognized as a formal diagnosis until 2013 — meaning decades of suffering passed without a name, let alone a treatment.
- Woollett herself planned her own death before a single doctor, specializing in women's health, finally identified what was happening — a reminder of how much depends on who happens to be in the room.
- The history of contraceptive development casts a long shadow: male pill trials were halted over mood swings and acne, while women in Puerto Rico died during 1950s female pill trials, and that asymmetry still shapes who gets believed and who gets medicated.
- Wellness culture has rushed into the diagnostic void, with hundreds of millions of social media views promoting cycle-syncing pseudoscience — offering suffering people a sense of control while steering them away from treatments that might actually help.
- Even when medication works, the risks are real: Woollett's own contraceptive treatment ended with a week in an ICU coma, and her question about whether the pill caused it was initially dismissed.
- The memoir refuses to resolve the central tension — between not wanting to reinforce stereotypes about women's emotional instability and the urgent fact that people are dying — and that refusal may be its most honest act.
For generations, a condition that plunges people into suicidal despair for days each month went unnamed, misdiagnosed, and dismissed — not by accident, but within a medical culture shaped by centuries of indifference to women's bodies. Laura Elizabeth Woollett's memoir Hell Days, drawing on her own diagnosis of premenstrual dysphoric disorder and years of research, places one person's suffering inside a much larger story: of contraceptive politics, medical misogyny, and the dangerous vacuum that pseudoscience rushes to fill when medicine fails. PMDD received formal psychiatric recognition only in 2013, and for the 5.5% of people with menstrual cycles who live with it, that delay has carried a cost measured in lives.
Laura Elizabeth Woollett's memoir Hell Days arrives as premenstrual dysphoric disorder is only beginning to receive serious attention. PMDD — a severe condition affecting roughly 5.5% of people with menstrual cycles — was not officially recognized as a psychiatric diagnosis until 2013. Woollett was diagnosed in 2019, in her mid-twenties, after years of symptoms that included planning her own death, only to find the despair lift once her period began. A woman doctor specializing in women's health caught what others had missed. Without that encounter, Woollett writes, she might have spent decades cycling through misdiagnosis.
The book is not a simple personal account. It weaves memoir with research and historical investigation, tracing the politics embedded in women's health from the beginning. The oral contraceptive pill was tested on women in Puerto Rico in the 1950s under dangerous conditions — three women died during trials — while male contraceptive trials were halted over side effects like mood swings and acne. This history sits at the intersection of feminist bodily autonomy, racism, classism, and medical misogyny, and Woollett uses it to illuminate both her own hesitation about medication and the broader skepticism many people with PMDD carry toward pharmaceutical solutions.
The condition itself is brutal. In the week before menstruation, people with PMDD may become withdrawn, irritable, exhausted, and severely depressed. Woollett also explores premenstrual exacerbation, where hormonal shifts worsen existing conditions like ADHD or trauma responses — a connection many clinicians still miss. The gaps in medical knowledge remain striking: diagnostic criteria exclude people whose symptoms don't fully resolve, and a psychiatric registrar at a public hospital only thought to ask, almost as an afterthought, whether a 24-year-old patient's repeated suicide attempts might be connected to the fact that she kept arriving during her period.
Woollett's own experience with medication illustrates the stakes. After starting a contraceptive pill, she felt transformed — but also intensely thirsty, feverish, and eventually too sick to move. Her husband rushed her to hospital. Her brain swelled. She spent a week in an ICU coma. When she asked whether the pill could have caused it, the question was dismissed. Only later did her original doctor acknowledge she may have experienced one of those rare side effects buried in the fine print.
Meanwhile, misinformation fills the void. Cycle-syncing — a blend of pseudoscience and mystical notions of the divine feminine — had generated hundreds of millions of social media views by mid-2026, selling dietary and spiritual practices based on faux biology, entangled with tradwife aesthetics and essentialist gender ideology. The appeal is understandable: people suffering want answers that don't require confronting the politics of their own bodies.
The stakes, however, are undeniable. People with PMDD are seven times more likely to attempt suicide and twice as likely to die by suicide than those without the condition. Woollett's memoir holds the full complexity — the history, the science, the politics, the lived experience — and refuses easy resolution. That refusal is, perhaps, its most important contribution.
Laura Elizabeth Woollett's new memoir, Hell Days, arrives at a moment when premenstrual dysphoric disorder is finally getting attention. PMDD—a severe form of premenstrual syndrome affecting about 5.5% of people with menstrual cycles—was only officially recognized as a psychiatric diagnosis in 2013. For Woollett, who was formally diagnosed in 2019 in her mid-twenties, that recognition came after years of symptoms that included planning her own death, only to find the despair lift once her period began. A woman doctor specializing in women's health caught what others had missed, prescribing an oral contraceptive that changed the trajectory of her life. Without that diagnosis, Woollett writes, she might have spent decades cycling through misdiagnosis and medication after medication.
Woollett's book is not a simple personal account. It weaves memoir with research, interviews, and historical investigation—part detective story, part thesis. She traces the politics embedded in women's health itself, beginning with the development of the oral contraceptive pill. While trials for a male contraceptive were halted because of side effects like mood swings and acne, the female pill was tested on women in Puerto Rico during the 1950s under far more dangerous conditions, with three women dying during the trials. This history matters because it sits at the intersection of feminist bodily autonomy, racism, classism, and medical misogyny. Woollett explores it not as abstract history but as context for her own hesitation about taking medication—and for understanding why so many people with PMDD remain skeptical of pharmaceutical solutions.
The condition itself is brutal. In the week before menstruation, people with PMDD may become withdrawn, irritable, exhausted, depressed—symptoms severe enough to interfere with ordinary life. One passage Woollett quotes captures the sensory intensity: "All perceptions are irritants. Smells are stronger. Dirt dirtier. Flesh fleshier." For those living with it, the experience can feel like inhabiting a different neurological state. Woollett also explores premenstrual exacerbation, where hormonal changes before menstruation worsen existing conditions like ADHD, autism, or trauma responses. Women with ADHD, she notes, are three times more likely to have PMDD—a connection many clinicians still miss.
The gaps in medical knowledge remain striking. Woollett interviews psychiatry professor Tory Eisenlohr-Moul, a leading PMDD expert and former chair of the International Association of Premenstrual Disorders clinical advisory board. Eisenlohr-Moul calls it "amazing" that PMDD exists as a diagnosis at all, yet points to a fundamental problem: the diagnostic criteria exclude people whose symptoms don't completely resolve, or who have other psychiatric symptoms alongside PMDD. A gynaecologist at the University of New South Wales told Woollett about a phone call with a psychiatric registrar at a public hospital. The registrar had just realized that a 24-year-old patient with multiple suicide attempts was arriving at the hospital during her period. The registrar asked, almost as an afterthought, whether that might be relevant. The gynaecologist's response was wordless disbelief.
Woollett's own experience with medication illustrates the complexity. After starting one brand of contraceptive pill, she felt energized and alive—possibly manic, she later reflects. But she was also intensely thirsty, drinking liters of water, waking drenched in sweat. Then one morning she woke too sick to work. By afternoon her husband rushed her to the hospital. Her brain swelled. Doctors worried about meningoencephalitis. She developed pneumonia and spent a week in an ICU coma. When she asked whether the pill could have caused it, the question was dismissed. Only later did the doctor who originally diagnosed her PMDD acknowledge that Woollett may have experienced one of those "one in a million" side effects listed in the fine print. The experience captures a deeper problem: medications can help people with PMDD, but they don't always work, and the risks are real.
Meanwhile, misinformation flourishes online. Woollett documents the rise of cycle-syncing—a blend of pseudoscience and mystical notions of the "divine feminine" promoted by wellness influencers. As of May 2026, she writes, there were 221,000 posts under #cyclesyncing on Instagram and 105,000 on TikTok, with cumulative views in the hundreds of millions. These accounts promote dietary, activity, and spiritual practices aligned with menstrual phases, selling products and services based on faux biology. The movement has become entangled with tradwife aesthetics, far-right ideology, and essentialist gender notions. The appeal is understandable: people suffering want a non-medical solution, something that doesn't require swallowing pills or confronting the politics of their own bodies.
Yet the stakes are undeniable. People with PMDD are seven times more likely to attempt suicide and twice as likely to die by suicide than people assigned female at birth without the condition. For some portion of each month, some people are living in what Woollett describes as hell. The challenge, as she frames it, is navigating between two impossible positions: the desire not to emphasize hormonal sensitivity (which can reinforce harmful stereotypes about women's emotional instability) and the urgent reality that people are suffering and dying. Woollett's memoir refuses easy answers. Instead, it holds the complexity—the history, the science, the politics, the lived experience—and asks readers to sit with it.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
All perceptions are irritants. Smells are stronger. Dirt dirtier. Flesh fleshier.— Laura Elizabeth Woollett, Hell Days
The biggest problem is that right now, if your symptoms do not completely go away at some point, you're excluded from the diagnosis.— Tory Eisenlohr-Moul, psychiatry professor and former chair of International Association of Premenstrual Disorders clinical advisory board