Six weeks after a phone call between an American envoy and a Kremlin aide, a recording of that conversation has become a question of trust in the long, uneven effort to end the war in Ukraine. The envoy, Steve Witkoff, appears in the audio to have coached Moscow on how to frame a peace proposal for President Trump, including the sensitive matter of Donetsk. Now Washington's attention has shifted from the substance of the talks to the hand that brought the words into public view. Whoever released them has changed the terms of the negotiation, and the parties must now decide whether a deal built
‘Witi-Leaks’: Who Leaked Trump Envoy Witkoff’s Coaching Call With Kremlin Aide Ushakov?
"Someone is leaking, someone is listening, but not us."
Why does this leak matter as much as the content?
Because the content shows an American envoy advising a Kremlin aide, and the leak shows someone is listening to the most sensitive channel in the talks. Both are now part of the story.
What exactly did Witkoff say?
By Bloomberg's transcript, that a deal needs Donetsk and maybe a land swap, and that they should talk more hopefully. He also suggested Putin congratulate Trump on Gaza.
Worth noting that's Bloomberg's transcript. Ushakov seemed to confirm the calls are real but said some of it was fake, and he didn't say which parts.
So who leaked it?
Nobody knows. Theories point to the US, Russia and Ukraine, each with some logic.
And they're theories. The CIA and NSA suggestion comes from an unnamed former official's strong suspicion, not evidence. Bloomberg hasn't said how it got the audio.
Why does the audio detail matter?
It suggests a source with access to raw collection or real seniority, according to the reporting.
That's an inference. It narrows things, but it doesn't identify anyone.
And Trump's reaction?
He backs Witkoff as a dealmaker, even though he said he hadn't heard the call. Witkoff is due in Moscow next week.
O Pulso
- A leaked recording of Steve Witkoff coaching a Kremlin aide on Ukraine peace terms has jolted Washington just as negotiations gather momentum.
- Republicans and Democrats are demanding his removal, while Trump stands by him as a dealmaker who sells a deal to both sides.
- Moscow admits the calls are authentic in part, denies any role in the leak, and hints that someone is listening in on its conversations.
- Suspicion ricochets between the US, Russia, Ukraine and Europe, with intelligence veterans naming the CIA, the NSA and Rubio's circle as possible sources.
- Witkoff is still set to travel to Moscow next week, and the outcome of that trip will show whether the damage is contained or deepening.
Six weeks after a phone call between an American envoy and a Kremlin aide, a recording of that conversation has become a question of trust in the long, uneven effort to end the war in Ukraine. The envoy, Steve Witkoff, appears in the audio to have coached Moscow on how to frame a peace proposal for President Trump, including the sensitive matter of Donetsk. Now Washington's attention has shifted from the substance of the talks to the hand that brought the words into public view. Whoever released them has changed the terms of the negotiation, and the parties must now decide whether a deal built on private assurances can survive being seen.
On October 14, Steve Witkoff, the envoy of President Donald Trump, spoke by phone with Yuri Ushakov, the senior foreign policy aide to Vladimir Putin. Bloomberg has since published audio and a transcript of the call, in which Witkoff appears to advise the Kremlin on how to pitch Trump's peace proposal. He suggests that a deal would require Donetsk and perhaps a land swap, urges a more hopeful tone, and proposes that Putin congratulate Trump on the Gaza agreement before a Trump-Putin call ahead of Zelenskyy's White House visit.
A second conversation, between Ushakov and the economic adviser Kirill Dmitriev, shows Dmitriev offering to pass a message informally so the Americans can write their own version. Bloomberg has not said how it obtained the recordings, and the question of who leaked them has quickly eclipsed the content.
Ushakov confirmed the calls were authentic while claiming some parts were fake, and called the leak unacceptable. Russia denies responsibility and points to the vulnerability of messaging apps. Intelligence voices float competing theories, from US agencies to a Russian effort to undermine Witkoff, a European service worried about his stance, or Kremlin rivals. Rubio, Lavrov and Ukraine have all been mentioned, though none has been proven involved.
In Congress, Republicans and Democrats alike have called for Witkoff to be fired, with one Democrat calling him a traitor. Trump has defended him as standard negotiation, and the White House and Richard Grenell have dismissed the transcript or pointed the blame at the leaker. Witkoff is still expected in Moscow next week, possibly with Jared Kushner, a visit that will test whether the affair ends as a scandal or reshapes the talks.
On October 14, Steve Witkoff, President Donald Trump's envoy, got on the phone with Yuri Ushakov, the senior foreign policy aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin. According to audio and a transcript later published by Bloomberg, Witkoff used the call to coach the Kremlin official on how to pitch a peace proposal to Trump. Six weeks later, the recording has set off a political storm in Washington, and a second question has overtaken the first: who leaked it?
Bloomberg reported on two calls. In the Witkoff-Ushakov exchange, the envoy said, by the transcript, that he knew what a deal would take: Donetsk, one of the two Donbas regions Moscow demands, and perhaps a land swap somewhere. He then urged a change of tone, saying that instead of talking like that, they should speak more hopefully, because he thought a deal was within reach. He also advised Ushakov to have Putin congratulate Trump on the Israel-Hamas peace deal in Gaza, and suggested arranging a Trump-Putin call before Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's planned White House visit.
The second call was between Ushakov and Kirill Dmitriev, Putin's economic adviser and a prominent figure in the talks. Dmitriev is quoted as saying he would pass something along informally, making clear it was informal, and let the Americans do their own version. He did not expect them to take the Russian text exactly, he said, but hoped it would end up as close to it as possible. Bloomberg said it reviewed and transcribed audio of both calls but did not say how it got them.
Ushakov, who was on both calls, appeared on Wednesday, November 26, to confirm they were authentic, while claiming parts were fake. He called the leaking of confidential conversations unacceptable. In an interview with the Russian newspaper Kommersant, he noted that some conversations on WhatsApp could be listened to by someone, hinting at how the calls may have been captured. Russia denies a role. "Someone is leaking, someone is listening, but not us," he said, adding that the leak was unlikely to be meant to improve relations.
Theories split three ways. A senior former intelligence official told The Guardian that interception could come from signals intelligence, cyber-attacks or access to devices, but strongly suspected the US side, naming the CIA and NSA as the capable agencies. The fact that Bloomberg got audio rather than a transcript suggests a source with access to raw collection or real seniority. Daniel Hoffman, a former CIA Moscow station chief, said it was hard to speculate and could be a hundred million things, including someone on the Russian side trying to hurt Witkoff. Another former official suggested a European intelligence service alarmed by Witkoff's pro-Russian stance.
The Telegraph raised suspicion over Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who once called Putin a gangster and reportedly described the original 28-point plan to senators as a Russian wishlist; sources said his department was unaware of the proposal. But the paper called undermining a close Trump ally a likely career-ending risk. It also floated Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov, said to despise Dmitriev, who is seen as a possible successor. The Guardian noted Russian agencies have released intercepted calls before but lacked an obvious motive here. Ukraine, uneasy with Witkoff's role, might want to weaken him and expose the Kremlin ties, but would have weighed the fallout with Washington.
Reaction in Congress crossed party lines. Republican Don Bacon of Nebraska demanded Witkoff be fired, asking whether a Russian paid agent would do less. Democrat Ted Lieu called him an actual traitor. Republican Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania called the leak a major problem and urged that Rubio be allowed to do his job.
Trump defended Witkoff, saying he hadn't heard the call but understood it was standard negotiation, and that a dealmaker sells Ukraine on a deal and Russia on a deal. White House communications director Steven Cheung said nothing was wrong with the "supposed" transcript. Richard Grenell, the special missions envoy, said the leaker should be fired instead. Trump said Witkoff will travel to Russia next week, possibly with son-in-law Jared Kushner, and Ushakov confirmed a preliminary agreement on a Moscow visit.
Citações Notáveis
He's gotta sell this to Ukraine, he's gotta sell Ukraine to Russia. That's what a dealmaker does.— President Donald Trump
Find the leaker and fire them immediately. The anonymous leaker is a national security risk.— Richard Grenell, US special missions envoy