Why Rockstar Games Shelved Plans for GTA in Tokyo, Moscow and Rio

Players won't skip a new GTA just because they know the city.
Vermeij explains why Rockstar feels safe revisiting American locations across game generations.
Mark

So Rockstar actually had Tokyo in development? That's not just a rumor?

Mimi

According to Obbe Vermeij, who was a technical director there, yes—they got far enough to plan for a Japanese studio to build it using Rockstar's own engine. But it never got past early planning.

Luke

We should note that's one person's account from an interview. We don't have internal Rockstar documents confirming the scope or how close it actually came to production.

Mark

Why would they kill something that far along?

Mimi

Money. Once GTA became a multi-billion-dollar franchise, the risk calculus changed. American cities are instantly recognizable everywhere—people know New York and Miami from movies and music, even if they've never been there.

Luke

That's the theory Vermeij offers. But we don't know if that was actually Rockstar's internal reasoning, or if there were other factors—technical challenges, licensing issues, market research we haven't seen.

Mark

So they're saying American settings are safer?

Mimi

Essentially, yes. With a decade of development time and massive budgets, executives aren't eager to gamble on unfamiliar cities. A place like Bogotá might excite players in theory, but it doesn't have the cultural shorthand that Miami or New York do.

Luke

That's a reasonable business argument, but it's worth asking: is that actually true, or is it a self-fulfilling prophecy? If you never try Tokyo, you never know if players would have embraced it.

Mark

Does this mean GTA will never leave America?

Mimi

Vermeij thinks it's unlikely. GTA 6 is set in Vice City again. The pattern suggests future games will cycle through established American locations rather than break new ground.

Luke

He's speculating about the future based on past decisions. Dan Houser's comments about American culture being core to GTA suggest it's ideological too, not just commercial. That's a different constraint than pure risk aversion.

Mark

What did Houser say exactly?

Mimi

That GTA's DNA is American—the violence, the gun culture, the larger-than-life characters. Moving it overseas would dilute what makes it work. Except for one experimental London game in the '90s, it's always been rooted in America.

Luke

So there are two arguments here: one commercial, one cultural. Vermeij emphasizes risk and familiarity. Houser emphasizes that the franchise is fundamentally American in its values. Those aren't the same thing, and readers should keep them separate.

  • A Tokyo-set GTA advanced far enough that a Japanese development partner was already in place — then vanished entirely, leaving only the outline of what might have been.
  • As GTA evolved into a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, the tolerance for creative risk collapsed under the weight of its own success.
  • American cities carry decades of cinematic mythology that make them instantly legible to players from Seoul to São Paulo, turning cultural familiarity into a financial safety net.
  • GTA 6's return to Vice City confirms the pattern: the franchise cycles through its established American locations rather than charting new geographic territory.
  • Rockstar co-founder Dan Houser has argued the series is American by design — its gun culture, exaggerated violence, and outsized personalities are not portable traits but the cultural DNA of the whole enterprise.

For nearly three decades, Grand Theft Auto has circled the same American geography — not out of creative limitation, but out of a calculated understanding that cultural familiarity is itself a form of capital. Rockstar Games once reached toward Tokyo, Moscow, and Rio, only to pull back as the franchise's financial stakes grew too vast to risk on unfamiliar ground. The story of these shelved cities is ultimately a story about how global success can quietly narrow the imagination, trading possibility for the proven path.

Grand Theft Auto once reached beyond America. Rockstar seriously explored settings in Tokyo, Moscow, Rio de Janeiro, and Istanbul, with the Tokyo project advancing furthest — a Japanese studio was already lined up to build it using Rockstar's own technology. Then the ambition quietly collapsed, and the series stayed home.

Obbe Vermeij, a former technical director at Rockstar, recently explained why. As GTA grew into a multi-billion-dollar franchise, the financial logic shifted decisively against unfamiliar settings. American cities — New York, Los Angeles, Miami — carry an almost automatic cultural weight for global audiences, built up through decades of Hollywood films, television, and music. A player in São Paulo or Seoul already knows what New York means. That embedded recognition translates directly into reduced commercial risk, and when a project demands nearly a decade of development and hundreds of millions of dollars, the appetite for gambling on the unknown disappears.

Vermeij's observation cuts deeper than geography. Cities like Bogotá or Toronto, however rich as potential settings, lack the immediate cultural shorthand that American locations provide. The franchise has grown so large that it has become, in his view, locked into revisiting the same handful of American-inspired cities — though each iteration's technological and narrative leaps make even familiar ground feel new.

GTA 6's return to Vice City, Rockstar's version of Miami, confirms the pattern. Rockstar co-founder Dan Houser has framed the issue in similar terms, arguing that the series is American by design rather than by accident. The exaggerated violence, the gun culture, the larger-than-life personalities that define GTA are distinctly American traits — and transplanting the franchise elsewhere, he has suggested, would strip away the cultural foundation that makes it work. One experimental exception, GTA: London in the late 1990s, only underscores how firmly the series has otherwise held its ground.

Grand Theft Auto almost went global. Rockstar Games once seriously explored planting the franchise in Tokyo, Moscow, Rio de Janeiro, and Istanbul—cities that would have offered players entirely new criminal landscapes to navigate. The Tokyo project advanced furthest, progressing to the point where a Japanese studio was lined up to develop it using Rockstar's proprietary technology. Then it stopped. The game never materialized, and the series remained tethered to America.

Obbe Vermeij, who worked as a technical director at Rockstar, recently explained the reasoning behind these shelved ambitions. Speaking to Gameshub, he laid out the calculus that ultimately killed the international experiments: as GTA transformed into a multi-billion-dollar franchise, the financial stakes became too high to risk unfamiliar settings. The math was straightforward. American cities—New York, Los Angeles, Miami—carry instant cultural weight for audiences worldwide, even those who have never set foot in the United States. Decades of Hollywood films, television shows, and music have embedded these places so deeply in the global imagination that they require no introduction. A player in Seoul or São Paulo understands what New York means. That familiarity translates directly into reduced commercial risk.

Vermeij's point cut deeper than simple geography. When a project demands nearly a decade of development time and hundreds of millions of dollars, the appetite for gambling on the unknown evaporates. A city like Bogotá or Toronto, however compelling as a setting, lacks the immediate cultural shorthand that American locations provide. Developers and executives naturally gravitate toward what they know will resonate. The franchise, in Vermeij's assessment, has become locked into a cycle of revisiting the same handful of American-inspired locations, each iteration so technologically and narratively transformed that the familiar setting feels fresh anyway.

GTA 6's official announcement confirmed this pattern. The game returns to Vice City, Rockstar's stylized version of Miami, once again choosing the proven path. If Vermeij's analysis holds, future entries will likely cycle through other established American locations—Liberty City, Los Santos—rather than venture into unmapped territory. The reasoning is almost self-evident: players will not skip a new Grand Theft Auto simply because they recognize the city. The leap in technology, storytelling sophistication, and sheer scale between releases makes even a revisited location feel like new ground.

This stance aligns with what Rockstar co-founder Dan Houser has said publicly. On the Lex Fridman podcast, Houser framed the issue in cultural terms. Beyond a single experimental entry—GTA: London, released in the late 1990s—the series has always been fundamentally rooted in American culture. The exaggerated violence, the gun culture, the outsized personalities that define GTA are not universal traits; they are distinctly American. Transplanting the franchise overseas, Houser suggested, would strip away the cultural DNA that makes it work. The series is American by design, not by accident, and that foundation has proven too valuable to abandon.

When you're dealing with projects of this scale, people naturally fall back on what they know will work. American cities are familiar to everyone, and that familiarity reduces risk.
— Obbe Vermeij, former Rockstar Games technical director
The exaggerated crime, firearms, and larger-than-life characters central to GTA are intrinsically tied to a distinctly American worldview. Moving the franchise overseas would dilute what makes it work.
— Dan Houser, Rockstar co-founder, paraphrased from Lex Fridman podcast
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su Livemint ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti