On an election day that many will remember as the moment the machinery of artificial intelligence met its civic limit, voters in at least 40 jurisdictions across ten American states chose to say no to datacenters, the vast warehouses of chips and cooling that have become the physical face of the AI age. Ohio, Maine and Kansas led the tally, while a small North Dakota city stood as a quiet exception. The result suggests that the promise of abundant computing is now being weighed against the land, the power, and the sense that its benefits flow to someone far away. Whether this rebuke becomes a
Voters Rejected Datacenters at the Ballot Box, Approving Nearly Every Moratorium on the Midterm Ballot
Datacenters were on the ballot in at least 40 jurisdictions, and nearly all lost
Forty jurisdictions, ten states. Why does this feel like a bigger deal than a handful of local zoning votes?
Because the pattern is consistent. Ohio had at least 14 municipalities act, Maine eight, and Emporia, Kansas banned high-impact facilities after a 1,000-acre gigawatt-scale proposal. Different places, same answer.
Worth noting the count is dozens of measures, and most are small municipalities. That's a strong signal on local sentiment, but it isn't a measure of how many megawatts actually get blocked.
And there was one holdout.
Hardwood, North Dakota, under 1,000 people, rejected restrictions. So it wasn't literally unanimous.
Right, and the source doesn't tell us why Hardwood voted that way, so I wouldn't read anything into it.
The governors seem to matter even more than the ballot measures.
Hinojosa in Texas, Bottoms in Georgia, Acton in Ohio have all pledged moratoriums or tighter rules. Even Abbott had turned against electricity subsidies for datacenters late on.
Pledges, though. None of them has taken office, and the report doesn't say what legal tools they'd use. Also, the framing that datacenters stand in for the ultra wealthy is the Guardian's characterization, not something voters were polled on here.
What about the industry reaction?
Musk joked about datacenters in space. Dan Ives predicted a slowdown and flagged Texas, which he says will supply 25 to 30 percent of datacenter capacity.
That's one analyst's estimate and a forecast, not a result. Treat the slowdown as a prediction.
El Pulso
- Voters approved nearly every datacenter moratorium placed before them in at least 40 jurisdictions, a sweep that turned local ballots into a referendum on the AI buildout.
- Ohio municipalities passed bans and restrictions, including Sunbury, where an Amazon datacenter project of $2m now faces a community that said no.
- Newly elected governors in Texas, Georgia and Ohio have pledged construction moratoriums, while Governor Abbott has abruptly turned against electricity subsidies for the facilities.
- Analyst Dan Ives expects datacenter buildout to slow, and all eyes are on Texas, which may hold a quarter to a third of planned capacity.
On an election day that many will remember as the moment the machinery of artificial intelligence met its civic limit, voters in at least 40 jurisdictions across ten American states chose to say no to datacenters, the vast warehouses of chips and cooling that have become the physical face of the AI age. Ohio, Maine and Kansas led the tally, while a small North Dakota city stood as a quiet exception. The result suggests that the promise of abundant computing is now being weighed against the land, the power, and the sense that its benefits flow to someone far away. Whether this rebuke becomes a lasting change in where the buildings rise will depend on whether newly elected leaders carry their pledges into law.
On Tuesday, datacenters appeared on ballots in at least 40 jurisdictions across ten states, and voters turned nearly all of those measures into approvals of moratoriums or restrictions. The buildings, which house the chips behind artificial intelligence and many everyday online services, have become a symbol of the tech industry itself, and the vote was a pointed rebuke of that symbol.
Ohio produced the largest tally, with at least 14 municipalities passing bans or limits. Sunbury, where Amazon had proposed a $2m project, was among them. In Maine, eight towns approved temporary moratoriums. In Emporia, Kansas, where a gigawatt-scale campus on 1,000 acres had recently been proposed, voters banned what the measure called high-impact datacenters. The only notable exception came in Hardwood, North Dakota, a town of fewer than 1,000 residents, which rejected restrictions.
Where datacenters were not formally on the ballot, candidates skeptical of them won anyway. In Texas, Democrat Gina Hinojosa defeated Republican Greg Abbott in a victory described as historic. She has promised construction moratoriums and more community say over whether datacenters get built. Abbott, late in his tenure, had reversed his earlier welcome and demanded an end to electricity subsidies for them. Georgia's Keisha Lance Bottoms and Ohio's Amy Acton have made similar pledges.
The opposition crosses party lines. Florida's Republican governor Ron DeSantis signed strict regulations on large datacenters earlier in the year. Elon Musk, who had poured more than $400m into conservative candidates, mused on X that datacenters in space were looking appealing.
Analyst Dan Ives reads the night as a sign that buildout will slow, and warns that a Democratic Senate will create real obstacles for AI legislation. For investors, Texas was the biggest worry, since it may supply a quarter to a third of planned datacenter capacity. What comes next is whether the winners keep their promises. Texas will be the clearest test of whether the ballot-box rebuke changes where the buildings go.
On Tuesday, datacenters were on the ballot in at least 40 jurisdictions across 10 states, and voters turned nearly all of the measures into approvals of moratoriums or restrictions. The Guardian counted dozens of them passing. The buildings, which house the chips that power artificial intelligence and many other online products, have become a symbol of the tech industry and AI. The vote was a pointed rebuke of that symbol.
Ohio produced the largest tally. At least 14 municipalities there passed bans or restrictions on datacenter development. One was Sunbury, where Amazon has proposed a $2m datacenter project. In Maine, eight municipalities approved temporary moratoriums. In Emporia, Kansas, where a 1,000-acre, gigawatt-scale datacenter was recently proposed, voters approved a ban on what the measure called high-impact datacenters.
The sweep had one notable exception. Hardwood, North Dakota, a small city with fewer than 1,000 residents, voted down a proposal that would have placed restrictions on datacenter development.
Where datacenters were not formally on the ballot, candidates who have resisted them won anyway. In Texas, Democrat Gina Hinojosa won the governorship in what the report describes as a historic victory over Republican Greg Abbott. She has promised to impose moratoriums on construction and to add restrictions and more community input into whether datacenters get built. Abbott, late in his tenure, had also tried to tap the same sentiment by demanding an end to electricity subsidies for datacenters, reversing his earlier stance welcoming them to the state.
Two other governors-elect have made similar pledges. Keisha Lance Bottoms, who won in Georgia, and Amy Acton, newly elected in Ohio, have both promised moratoriums on construction of large datacenters.
The opposition has grown over recent months and crosses party lines. In May, Florida governor Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed a bill imposing strict regulations on large-scale datacenters. Still, the Guardian reports, Tuesday's results solidified what it calls overwhelming opposition to facilities that have come to stand in for the ultra wealthy and for resource extraction by the AI industry.
Elon Musk, who put more than $400m into supporting conservative candidates, responded on X: "Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now."
Analyst Dan Ives read the results as a sign that the pace of datacenter buildout will begin to slow. He said there is no way to sugarcoat that Democrats taking control, especially in the Senate, will create major hurdles for AI and tech legislation in Washington over the next two years. He singled out Hinojosa, whom he called a known anti-datacenter politician. For tech investors and the AI trade, he said, Texas was the biggest worry of the night, since 25% to 30% of datacenter gigawatts and capacity will come from the state.
What to watch next is whether the winners follow through. Hinojosa, Bottoms and Acton have each pledged moratoriums, and Texas, given its share of planned capacity, is the clearest test of whether the ballot-box rebuke changes where the buildings go.
Citas Notables
Data centers in space looking pretty appealing right now.— Elon Musk, on X
There is no way to sugarcoat that Democrats taking control especially over the Senate will create some major hurdles for AI and tech legislation in the Beltway over the next two years.— Dan Ives, analyst