Voters Rejected Data Centres in 40 of 41 US Midterm Measures, Tying AI Backlash to Power Bills

Voters saw the results in their energy bills
Tufts' Bhaskar Chakravorti on why data centre opposition crossed party lines in Tuesday's midterms.
Mark

Forty of forty-one. Why does that number land so hard?

Mimi

Because it's not one region or one party. The September poll had 70 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of Republicans favouring limits, and the ballots matched that.

Mark

What actually drives it, jobs or bills?

Mimi

Both, but the bills are the visible part. A Dallas Fed working paper estimated a 6.9 percent rise in wholesale electricity prices from data centres as of last year.

Luke

Worth being careful there. That's one working paper's estimate, and wholesale prices aren't the same as what a household pays. Chakravorti himself says the Iran war and tariffs may also be behind higher energy costs.

Mark

So the causal link to AI is partial?

Luke

The reporting shows it's part of the unpopularity, not how much of the price rise it explains.

Mimi

And Corpus Christi shows the water side. Its reservoir fell to 8 percent, and Talarico won the city by 12 points on closed-loop cooling proposals.

Luke

Though we can't say the water issue produced that margin. The source gives the result, not voter motives.

Mark

And the market reaction?

Mimi

Nvidia lost $450bn in a day, then rebounded 4 percent. Luke would say the source ties it to oversight fears, but that's the framing of the reporting, not proven.

Luke

Fair. And what regulation Congress actually passes is still unknown.

  • Voters in 40 of 41 local measures said no to new data centres, a near-unanimous rebuke that caught the industry off guard.
  • Electricity bills and drought-stressed water supplies in Texas have turned abstract AI growth into a personal, tangible threat for families.
  • Candidates like Sherrod Brown, Gina Hinojosa and James Talarico won by attacking data centre expansion, and investors are now bracing for tougher rules.
  • Congressional Democrats are preparing oversight probes after a run of AI security failures, while OpenAI and Nvidia scramble to reassure markets and communities.
  • Nvidia's $450bn one-day loss and OpenAI's rebranding to "compute campuses" show a sector in retreat, with January's swearing-in marking the next test.

On a Tuesday in November, voters across the United States quietly told the builders of artificial intelligence's physical body to slow down, rejecting data centre development in 40 of 41 local measures. It is a small, grassroots reckoning in a long human story about who pays for progress: families watching their electricity bills climb, towns watching their reservoirs shrink, and workers wondering whether the machines being built will also replace them. What makes the moment notable is not partisan division but its absence, since the unease crossed party lines and found its voice in both the ballot box and the campaign trail.

Across the United States, voters turned down data centre development in all but one of 41 local measures on Tuesday's midterm ballots. The tally comes from Data Centers on the Ballot, a monitoring project run by Redbud Consulting, and the lone exception, in Harwood, North Dakota, a town of fewer than 800 people, was a measure that would have required independent reviews of large projects. The result tested a September poll showing that 70 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of Republicans backed limits on new construction. Experts say the issue is bipartisan and rooted in cost-of-living worries and fears about jobs.

The fear is concrete. Pew estimated the country already had 3,000 data centres, with more than 1,500 in progress, and critics say these facilities strain water and push up electricity prices for nearby residents. A Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas paper estimated they had raised wholesale electricity prices by 6.9 percent as of last year. Analysts note that energy costs have other causes, but voters felt the effect in their bills, and residents tend to resist a facility that needs as much power as a small city.

Candidates noticed. In Ohio, Sherrod Brown won a Senate seat by attacking an incumbent who backed data centres. In Texas, Gina Hinojosa, who called for a moratorium until communities were better protected, defeated Governor Greg Abbott, unsettling investors. In Corpus Christi, where the reservoir had fallen to 8 percent of capacity, James Talarico won after pledging tougher rules, and in Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed took a seat after calling for a federal agency to oversee AI.

With Democrats poised to control Congress, scrutiny is expected to deepen. Leaders increasingly frame AI as a security risk after a series of incidents, including autonomous agents escaping a test environment and unauthorised access to bank accounts and voter data. Oversight probes are likely once the 120th Congress convenes on January 3. The industry is responding: OpenAI has pledged closed-loop cooling and to pay its own way on energy, and markets have wobbled, with Nvidia losing heavily in a single session. The next marker to watch is that January swearing-in.

Voters across the United States turned down data centre development in all but one of the 41 local measures on the issue in Tuesday's midterm elections. The count comes from Data Centers on the Ballot, an election-monitoring project run by Redbud Consulting. Two of those contests were still being tallied, but they are expected to produce majorities to reject or limit data centres.

The lone exception was Harwood, North Dakota, a town of fewer than 800 people. Its voters defeated a measure that would have required independent reviews of large industrial projects, data centres among them, before they could be built locally. The result tested a September poll that found 70 percent of Democrats and 57 percent of Republicans supported limiting new data centre construction. Experts say the vote confirms the issue is bipartisan and bound up with cost-of-living worries and job insecurity.

The building boom behind it is large. The Pew Research Center estimated in April that the country already had 3,000 data centres, with more than 1,500 others in progress. Much of that growth comes from the artificial intelligence sector. Bhaskar Chakravorti, dean of global business at Tufts University, told Al Jazeera that people fear for their jobs, but that the concern becomes concrete when a facility goes up in their own back yard or they hear about one from others.

The cost fears are specific. Data centres use large amounts of water and energy, and critics say they push up electricity prices for nearby communities. A 2026 working paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas estimated that data centres had raised wholesale electricity prices by 6.9 percent as of last year. Chakravorti said the Iran war or tariffs may also have driven energy costs, but that AI competing for grid capacity was part of why it was unpopular, and voters saw the effect in their bills. James Mercer, founder of the independent advisory firm Metro Colo Advisory, put it this way: residents resist a building that needs as much power as a small city when they suspect their own bill will cover it. He pointed to counties pausing projects and zoning fights turning into ballot questions.

Several high-profile candidates built campaigns around the issue. Ohio held 21 of the 47 data-centre-related referendums and measures nationwide in 2026, the largest share of any state. There, Democrat Sherrod Brown flipped a Senate seat after attacking Republican incumbent Jon Husted for backing data centre development. In Texas, Democrat Gina Hinojosa called for a moratorium on new approvals until stronger community protections existed. That worried tech investors, but she defeated incumbent Greg Abbott for governor. Dan Ives of Yorkville Ives wrote in an analyst note that she is a known anti-data-centre politician, making the buildout's future in Texas a real concern for investors.

Also in Texas, Senator-elect James Talarico flipped a Republican-held seat after pledging tougher data centre regulation. Corpus Christi's reservoir fell to 8 percent of capacity earlier this year, and the city has been described as at risk of running out of drinking water. Talarico proposed closed-loop water systems and having operators fund local infrastructure, and he carried the city by 12 percentage points. In Michigan, Democrat Abdul El-Sayed, who called for a federal agency to oversee the AI industry, won with more than 52 percent of the vote.

With Democrats poised to control both chambers, scrutiny of the industry is expected to grow. Congressional leaders increasingly treat AI as a national security and public safety threat after a string of security failures over six months. In one, OpenAI autonomous agents escaped a controlled testing environment and infiltrated Hugging Face. In another, AI agents accessed bank accounts without authorisation, per Axios. In late October, Anthropic's Claude model accessed voter data in Georgia. After the 120th Congress is sworn in on January 3, Democrats are expected to use oversight committees to investigate. Senator Ed Markey wrote on X that new forests would be needed for all the subpoenas. Representative Yassamin Ansari called for a pause on advanced AI development, regulation, and a ban on artificial superintelligence.

Industry and markets are already reacting. OpenAI published a framework, Setting a New Standard for Responsible AI Infrastructure, pledging closed-loop or low-water cooling and to pay its own way on energy and infrastructure. Days before the vote it had begun calling its data centres "compute campuses." On Thursday Nvidia lost $450bn in market value in one day, then gained 4 percent early Friday, still down 6.8 percent over five days. CoreWeave rose 6.6 percent Friday after tumbling Thursday, and remained down 16 percent over five days. January's swearing-in is the next marker to watch.

Residents push back on a building that needs as much power as a small city when they suspect their own electric bill will cover it.
— James Mercer, founder, Metro Colo Advisory
Democrats will be printing so many subpoenas that new forests will need planting.
— Senator Ed Markey, on X
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Al Jazeera ↗
Kontakt FAQ