Across Vietnam, a quiet epidemic is reshaping childhood — millions of young eyes are straining under the weight of screens, fluorescent classrooms, and shrinking hours of daylight play, leaving nearly a third of school-age children nearsighted and many on a path toward serious vision loss. The crisis is not simply one of blurred sight corrected by lenses, but of a biological progression that, left unmanaged, can permanently alter a child's future. What medicine now understands is that each dioptre of unchecked myopia carries compounding risk, and that the window for meaningful intervention is
Vietnam's myopia crisis: 30-40% of school children now nearsighted
Each additional dioptre raises blindness risk by 67 percent
So we're talking about nearsightedness becoming epidemic in Vietnamese schools. What's actually changed? Kids have always needed glasses.
The scale and speed are what's new. Thirty to forty percent of all school children now have refractive errors. In some urban classrooms, it's three-quarters of the room. And the prescriptions are getting stronger faster—some kids gaining a full dioptre in a year.
How confident are we in those numbers? The National Eye Hospital survey found 26.6 percent in urban secondary schools, but that one classroom hit 75.6 percent. That's a huge range.
True. The 30-40 percent is a Ministry of Health figure for all school-age children with any refractive error. The 75.6 percent is one classroom in HCM City. So there's real variation depending on location and age group.
Why is it happening now? Is it genetic, or is it the screens?
Doctors say it's a combination. Genetics matters, but lifestyle is the driver—hours on tablets and phones, less outdoor time, poor classroom lighting, bad posture. The screens are the obvious culprit, but it's really about near work without breaks.
Do we know if screens actually cause myopia, or do kids who are already myopic just use screens more because they can't see far away?
That's a fair question. The reporting doesn't establish causation definitively. But the doctors are saying prolonged near work increases risk, and screen time is a form of prolonged near work.
What's the actual danger here? Kids wear glasses. Problem solved, right?
No. That's the critical point. If myopia keeps progressing into what they call high myopia, the eyeball physically elongates and the retina stretches. That can cause retinal damage, detachment, even blindness.
And the numbers on that risk?
Each additional dioptre of myopia increases blindness risk by 67 percent. But controlling each dioptre of progression reduces serious complications later by about 40 percent.
So early intervention actually matters.
It's the difference between a manageable condition and potential blindness. The key is catching it before it accelerates, not waiting until a child says they can't see the board.
But how many kids are actually getting that early intervention? The reporting mentions the health sector is implementing periodic exams, but it sounds like it's just starting.
Exactly. Schools are checking if light bulbs work, not measuring actual light levels. Desks aren't arranged for proper viewing distance. The infrastructure for early detection and management isn't really there yet.
El Pulso
- Nearly five million Vietnamese school children already have refractive errors, with myopia rates in some urban classrooms surpassing 75 percent — a scale that signals not individual misfortune but a systemic public health emergency.
- The true danger is not needing glasses but the silent elongation of the eyeball that follows unchecked progression, raising the risk of retinal damage and blindness by 67 percent for every additional dioptre gained.
- Children often adapt to blurred vision without telling their parents, making the absence of complaint a false reassurance and placing the burden of vigilance entirely on adults who may not know to look.
- Doctors are urging a fundamental shift in approach — from correcting vision with stronger lenses to actively slowing progression through early screening, specialized intervention, and measurable changes in how children spend their time and light.
- Controlling even one dioptre of myopia progression can reduce the risk of serious complications by 40 percent, but schools lack the lighting standards, furniture design, and screening infrastructure to act at the scale the crisis demands.
Across Vietnam, a quiet epidemic is reshaping childhood — millions of young eyes are straining under the weight of screens, fluorescent classrooms, and shrinking hours of daylight play, leaving nearly a third of school-age children nearsighted and many on a path toward serious vision loss. The crisis is not simply one of blurred sight corrected by lenses, but of a biological progression that, left unmanaged, can permanently alter a child's future. What medicine now understands is that each dioptre of unchecked myopia carries compounding risk, and that the window for meaningful intervention is narrow, early, and closing. Vietnam stands at a threshold where the choices made in clinics, classrooms, and homes today will determine how clearly an entire generation sees tomorrow.
When Trương Vĩnh Thành brought his four-year-old daughter to the HCM City Eye Hospital for a routine checkup, he did not expect to leave with a diagnosis. Yet the examination confirmed what her squinting and complaints of tired eyes after tablet use had been quietly signaling: 0.75 dioptres of myopia, already present in a child barely old enough for school. The discovery deepened when the family considered his nine-year-old daughter, who had worn glasses for two years and whose prescription had jumped by more than one dioptre in a single year. Neither parent was nearsighted. Both had tried to do everything right. Still, both daughters were myopic and worsening.
Theirs is not an unusual story. Vietnam's Ministry of Health estimates that between 30 and 40 percent of school-age children — roughly five million students — now have refractive errors, with myopia accounting for the majority. Urban rates are far higher than rural ones, and in some HCM City classrooms, nearly three-quarters of children have been found to have refractive errors. The condition is appearing earlier and advancing faster than it did a generation ago, driven by long hours of near-work, screen exposure, and the steady disappearance of outdoor play from children's daily lives.
What makes the crisis medically urgent is not the need for glasses itself, but what follows when myopia is left to progress unchecked. As the eye elongates under sustained myopic pressure, the retina stretches and becomes vulnerable to damage, degeneration, and detachment. According to specialists at HCM City Eye Hospital, each additional dioptre of myopia raises the risk of blindness-causing eye disease by 67 percent. A child who moves from mild to high myopia over a few years — while parents simply buy stronger lenses — may be quietly accumulating risk that will not become visible until much later in life.
Ophthalmologists are calling for a fundamental change in how myopia is understood and managed. The goal, they insist, must shift from correcting blurred vision to slowing the progression before it reaches dangerous thresholds. Early screening, regular monitoring at specialized facilities, and timely clinical intervention can reduce the risk of serious complications by approximately 40 percent for each dioptre of progression controlled. But the current system is poorly equipped for this approach. Classroom lighting is rarely measured at the desk level, furniture is often mismatched to children's bodies, and eye examinations remain irregular and inconsistent across schools.
For families already navigating the condition, the lesson is clear: glasses are not a solution, only a tool, and the window for meaningful prevention is narrow. For Vietnam's health and education systems, the challenge is whether they can build the infrastructure — in clinics, classrooms, and public awareness — to reach millions of children before myopia becomes not a manageable inconvenience, but a permanent threat to sight.
Trương Vĩnh Thành brought his four-year-old daughter to the HCM City Eye Hospital expecting a routine checkup. Instead, he learned she was already nearsighted—0.75 dioptres of myopia, a condition he had not suspected until the examination revealed what her squinting and complaints of tired eyes after tablet use had been signaling. The discovery was unsettling enough on its own. It became alarming when the family realized that his older daughter, nine years old, had been wearing glasses for more than two years with a prescription of 3.5 dioptres, and that her vision was worsening faster than expected. At her most recent checkup, her prescription had jumped by more than one dioptre in a single year. Neither parent wore glasses. Both had taught their children proper posture while studying. Yet both daughters were now myopic, and the condition was advancing.
They are not alone. Across Vietnam, myopia has become a defining health crisis of childhood. The Ministry of Health reports that approximately five million school-age children—between 30 and 40 percent of the student population—now have refractive errors, with myopia accounting for the majority. In urban areas, the numbers are far more severe. A survey by the National Eye Hospital found that more than a quarter of secondary school students in cities are nearsighted, compared to roughly 14 to 16 percent in rural areas. In one HCM City classroom, nearly 76 percent of children had refractive errors; more than half of those were myopic. The condition is appearing earlier in childhood and progressing faster than it did a generation ago.
Doctors at specialized eye hospitals are seeing the acceleration firsthand. Nguyễn Huỳnh Yến Nhi, an ophthalmologist and head of the Myopia Control Centre at Sài Gòn Eye Hospital, has treated many children whose prescriptions have strengthened by more than one dioptre within a single year—a rate of change that, left unchecked, can lead to serious complications. The culprits are familiar: children spend hours studying, reading, and staring at smartphone and tablet screens while outdoor play and exercise have declined. Poor lighting in classrooms, inadequate viewing distances, and slouched posture compound the problem. But the real danger lies not in needing glasses. It lies in what happens when myopia progresses unchecked into what doctors call high myopia.
Each additional dioptre of myopia carries measurable risk. According to Dr. Trần Đình Minh Huy from the Refractive Surgery Department of the HCM City Eye Hospital, every dioptre increase raises the risk of blindness-causing eye diseases by 67 percent. As myopia worsens, the eyeball physically elongates, stretching the retina and increasing the likelihood of retinal damage, degeneration, and detachment—conditions that can result in severe vision loss or permanent blindness. The progression from a child needing glasses to a teenager at risk of sight-threatening complications can happen quietly, over months or a few years, while parents simply buy stronger lenses and move on.
This is where the medical approach must shift. Doctors emphasize that the goal cannot be merely to correct blurred vision with new glasses. The goal must be to slow myopia's progression before it accelerates into high myopia. This requires early detection, before a child's prescription begins to climb significantly, followed by regular monitoring and timely intervention. Dr. Nhi warns that children often adapt to reduced vision without complaining to their parents—a child may simply accept that the blackboard is blurry and stop mentioning it. Parents cannot wait for a child to say they cannot see. They must bring children for regular eye examinations at specialized facilities, particularly when prescriptions are changing rapidly.
The potential payoff is substantial. Controlling each dioptre of myopia progression can reduce the risk of serious eye complications later in life by approximately 40 percent. Yet the current system is not structured for this kind of early intervention. Schools check whether light bulbs work but rarely measure actual light levels at students' desks or assess glare on blackboards and screens. Desk and chair arrangements often do not account for children's varying heights and developmental stages, forcing some students to lean forward or crane their necks to see. The health sector in HCM City has begun implementing periodic eye examinations for students and has called on schools to improve lighting conditions and furniture arrangement, but the effort remains fragmented.
For families like Trương Vĩnh Thành's, the path forward is now clear: frequent monitoring, early intervention, and a shift away from the assumption that glasses are a solution in themselves. For the millions of Vietnamese children whose vision is already changing, the window for prevention is closing. The question is whether the country's schools and health system can move fast enough to catch them before myopia becomes not a manageable condition requiring glasses, but a threat to sight itself.
Citas Notables
Children may adapt to reduced vision and may not actively tell their parents about it. Regular eye examinations can help detect refractive errors early and monitor changes.— Dr. Nguyễn Huỳnh Yến Nhi, head of Myopia Control Centre at Sài Gòn Eye Hospital
The higher the degree of myopia, the more the eyeball elongates, potentially increasing the risk of retinal damage, retinal degeneration and retinal detachment.— Dr. Trần Đình Minh Huy, Refractive Surgery Department, HCM City Eye Hospital