Vienna researchers control nanopore shapes in 'white graphene' through atmospheric engineering

Drilling with electrons favors circles; oxygen etching favors triangles.
The pore shape emerges from competition between two atomic-scale processes that researchers can now control.
Mark

So they're using an electron microscope to punch holes in this material. That's the basic technique, right?

Mimi

Yes, but the breakthrough is understanding what controls the shape of those holes. For nearly twenty years, people thought it was just physics—that boron and nitrogen atoms had different resistance to being knocked out by electrons.

Mark

And that's not what's happening?

Mimi

It's part of it, but only part. The atmosphere around the sample matters just as much. In a perfect vacuum, you get circular pores. Add oxygen, and you get triangular ones.

Luke

How much oxygen are we talking about? Is this a tiny trace, or a meaningful amount?

Mimi

Even small amounts shift the outcome. The oxygen gets split by the electron beam into reactive species that chemically attack the material, preferentially removing boron atoms.

Mark

So it's two processes happening at once—the electrons drilling, and the oxygen etching?

Mimi

Exactly. They're in competition. Electrons favor circular pores, oxygen-mediated etching favors triangular ones. By controlling the atmosphere, you control which process wins.

Luke

And they can actually see this happening? They're not inferring it from the final pore shape?

Mimi

They used a microscope with an exceptionally good vacuum and the ability to introduce gases on demand. So they could observe the outcome under different conditions directly.

Mark

What's the practical payoff here? Why does pore shape matter so much?

Mimi

At the atomic scale, the geometry and the chemical composition of the pore edges determine how molecules interact with it. Different shapes could be better for different applications—filtration, DNA analysis, catalysis.

Luke

Are they saying they can now make any shape they want, or just that they've found a way to choose between circular and triangular?

Mimi

They've demonstrated control over circular versus triangular so far. Kotakoski mentioned they expect to find ways to create different shapes, but that's future work.

  • For nearly two decades, scientists assumed the triangular pores formed in boron nitride were an inevitable consequence of physics — a puzzle whose answer turned out to be wrong.
  • Doctoral student Umair Javed and colleagues used an exceptionally clean vacuum chamber to isolate the electron beam's true behavior, revealing that in pure conditions it drills circular pores, not triangular ones.
  • The introduction of even trace oxygen transformed the outcome entirely, as reactive oxygen species selectively stripped boron atoms and left nitrogen-lined triangular edges — exposing a hidden chemical rivalry at the atomic scale.
  • Researchers can now tip the balance between physical drilling and chemical etching simply by adjusting the gas atmosphere, giving them deliberate control over pore shape rather than passive acceptance of it.
  • The method is expected to extend to other two-dimensional materials, positioning this discovery as a generalizable toolkit for designing atomically precise structures in filtration, catalysis, and quantum technologies.

At the University of Vienna, physicist Jani Kotakoski and his team have resolved a long-standing mystery in materials science: the shape of atomic-scale holes in hexagonal boron nitride is not fixed by physics alone, but is negotiated between physical force and chemical atmosphere. By introducing oxygen during electron beam irradiation, researchers discovered they could steer pore geometry from circular to triangular — a distinction that, at the scale of individual atoms, determines how a material interacts with the world passing through it. This quiet mastery over atomic architecture opens a path toward membranes and devices engineered with a precision that was, until now, beyond reach.

At the University of Vienna, physicist Jani Kotakoski and his team have resolved a puzzle that has occupied materials scientists for nearly two decades: why nanopores drilled into hexagonal boron nitride take the shapes they do — and how to control them. Hexagonal boron nitride, a single-atom-thick honeycomb of boron and nitrogen, serves as an insulating counterpart to graphene, stable enough to shield other two-dimensional materials from their environments. When nanopores are opened through it, the resulting membranes can filter molecules, analyze DNA, and support quantum devices. But at atomic scales, the geometry of each pore and the chemical identity of its edges determine everything about how it functions.

For years, the triangular pores consistently produced by electron beam irradiation were explained as a straightforward consequence of physics — boron and nitrogen atoms simply responding differently to being struck by energetic electrons. Doctoral student Umair Javed and his colleagues decided to test this assumption directly, using a transmission electron microscope fitted with an exceptionally clean vacuum chamber capable of introducing specific gases on demand. What they found overturned the prevailing explanation. Under near-perfect vacuum, the electron beam removed boron and nitrogen at roughly equal rates, producing circular pores. Adding nitrogen gas changed nothing. But trace amounts of oxygen transformed the result entirely: boron atoms were stripped away preferentially, leaving nitrogen-lined triangular pores.

The mechanism, it turned out, is a competition. The electron beam acts as a physical drill, knocking atoms loose without discrimination and favoring circular geometry. Oxygen, split into reactive species by the beam, simultaneously attacks the material through selective chemical etching — removing boron and shaping triangular edges. By adjusting the atmospheric composition during irradiation, researchers found they could shift the balance between these two processes and choose the resulting pore shape.

Kotakoski sees the implications extending well beyond boron nitride. Similar atmospheric strategies are expected to work across other two-dimensional materials, and the team is already exploring how to use this control to build catalytically active structures as part of an Austrian Science Fund initiative on energy conversion and storage. What began as a question about why pores looked a certain way has become a method for designing them — a toolkit for writing structure into matter one atom at a time.

At the University of Vienna, physicist Jani Kotakoski and his team have cracked a problem that materials scientists have been wrestling with for nearly two decades: how to control the shape of holes punched into hexagonal boron nitride at the atomic scale. The material itself—a single layer of atoms arranged in a honeycomb pattern—is the insulating cousin of graphene, stable enough to protect other two-dimensional materials from their surroundings. When researchers drill nanopores through it, those tiny openings become permeable membranes that molecules and ions can pass through, opening possibilities for DNA analysis, molecular filtration, and quantum applications. But the shape of each pore matters enormously. At scales measured in atoms, the precise geometry and the chemical identity of the atoms lining the edge determine how the pore interacts with whatever passes through it.

For years, scientists have used transmission electron microscopes to create these nanopores. The same beam of electrons that allows researchers to see individual atoms can also dislodge them from the material. Keep the beam focused long enough, and defects grow into pores. The puzzle was consistency: electron irradiation of hexagonal boron nitride reliably produced triangular pores, and the prevailing explanation was straightforward—boron and nitrogen atoms simply have different susceptibilities to being knocked loose by the electron beam. The shape was assumed to be purely a matter of physics.

Umair Javed, a doctoral student in Kotakoski's group, and his colleagues decided to test this assumption more carefully. They used a transmission electron microscope equipped with an exceptionally clean vacuum chamber and the ability to introduce specific gases on demand. This setup let them observe what happened when electrons acted on the material in near-perfect isolation, then watch how the outcome shifted as they introduced different atmospheric conditions. The results overturned the conventional wisdom. Under ultra-high vacuum, with almost no stray molecules present, the electron beam removed boron and nitrogen atoms at roughly equal rates. The pores that formed were circular. Adding nitrogen gas changed almost nothing. But introduce even trace amounts of oxygen, and the picture transformed. Boron atoms were stripped away much more readily than nitrogen atoms, and the pores that emerged were triangular, with edges lined by nitrogen atoms.

The mechanism turned out to be a collaboration between two competing processes. The electron beam acts as a drill, its energetic particles knocking atoms out indiscriminately—a purely physical process that favors circular geometry. Simultaneously, oxygen in the chamber undergoes a chemical transformation under the electron beam, splitting into reactive species that chemically attack the boron nitride material. This chemical etching process is selective: it preferentially removes boron, leaving nitrogen-terminated edges and producing triangular pores. By adjusting the atmospheric composition during irradiation, the researchers discovered they could tip the balance between these two mechanisms, controlling which pore shape would ultimately form.

Kotakoski emphasized the broader significance of the finding. The team expects similar atmospheric control strategies to work on other two-dimensional materials, and they anticipate being able to engineer different pore geometries in hexagonal boron nitride itself. This level of atomic-scale precision could enable the creation of structures tailored for specific applications—water filtration systems that exploit particular pore geometries, catalytic surfaces engineered at the atomic level, and quantum devices that depend on exact structural specifications. The work is part of a larger Austrian Science Fund initiative focused on materials for energy conversion and storage, where Kotakoski's group is already exploring how to use this method to build new catalytically active structures. What began as a question about why pores took a particular shape has become a toolkit for designing them.

The shape of the pores is not due to the electrons alone, but is influenced by the atmosphere around the sample.
— Umair Javed, doctoral student, University of Vienna
We expect to find similar ways to control pore shapes in other materials, and perhaps also to create different shapes in hexagonal boron nitride.
— Jani Kotakoski, physicist, University of Vienna
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Chemeurope ↗
Contáctanos FAQ