On opposite ends of the Earth, two teams of physicists have independently crossed a threshold that scientists have imagined for half a century: a clock that measures time not by the dance of electrons, but by the deeper pulse of the atomic nucleus itself. Working in Vienna and Beijing with thorium-229 crystals and powerful lasers, researchers have built the first operating nuclear clocks — instruments that may one day surpass even our most precise timekeepers and open windows into the invisible architecture of the universe. That both teams arrived here separately, by different paths, suggests
Vienna and Beijing teams independently achieve world's first operating nuclear clocks
gives access to a whole new physics universe
So these are nuclear-powered clocks? Like, they run on fission?
No, that's the confusing part. They're called nuclear clocks because they measure time by watching how a laser interacts with the nucleus of an atom. The nucleus itself is what's doing the timekeeping work, not powering anything.
Right, and that's the key difference from atomic clocks, which measure electrons. But I want to be clear—these clocks are still in early stages. Schumm says they're far from target performance.
Absolutely. They work, they function, but there's a lot of refinement ahead. What's remarkable is that two independent teams got there at the same time using different approaches.
Why does that matter so much?
It proves the concept isn't fragile. It's not dependent on one lab's particular setup or one person's genius. The physics is robust.
Though we should note—we don't yet know if nuclear clocks will actually outperform the best atomic clocks in real-world conditions. The Vienna team's experiment with dark matter detection didn't find anything, but the clock performed well in that test.
So what's the actual practical benefit? Why should anyone care?
GPS, internet, cellular networks—all of these depend on atomic clocks staying synchronized. If nuclear clocks can be more accurate and smaller, that changes everything about how we build those systems.
And then there's the physics side. Schumm talks about accessing a whole new physics universe. That's speculative, but it's not empty talk—precision measurement tools have historically opened new discoveries.
When will we actually see these in use?
That's the question. The teams are still perfecting the technology. But they're talking about combining their strengths—Vienna's better crystals with Beijing's stronger laser.
Which suggests we're looking at years, not months, before these move beyond the lab.
The Pulse
- A fifty-year dream has become a working instrument — two labs on opposite sides of the world have simultaneously crossed into territory no physicist has reached before.
- The clocks are still rough and far from their theoretical potential, creating a race not against each other but against the limits of current materials and laser technology.
- Vienna holds the better crystals; Beijing holds the more powerful laser — a division of strengths that makes collaboration not just appealing but almost inevitable.
- The Vienna team already aimed their unfinished clock at one of physics' greatest mysteries, dark matter, and while it found nothing, it proved the instrument could compete with the world's best atomic clocks.
- The stakes extend far beyond laboratories: satellite navigation, data synchronization, and the fundamental science of measurement all stand to be transformed if nuclear clocks reach their promised precision.
On opposite ends of the Earth, two teams of physicists have independently crossed a threshold that scientists have imagined for half a century: a clock that measures time not by the dance of electrons, but by the deeper pulse of the atomic nucleus itself. Working in Vienna and Beijing with thorium-229 crystals and powerful lasers, researchers have built the first operating nuclear clocks — instruments that may one day surpass even our most precise timekeepers and open windows into the invisible architecture of the universe. That both teams arrived here separately, by different paths, suggests this is not a lucky accident but a genuine turning point in humanity's long effort to understand what time is and how finely it can be held.
Two research teams — one at TU Wien in Vienna led by Thorsten Schumm, one at Tsinghua University in Beijing led by Shiqian Ding — have independently built the world's first operating nuclear clocks, a milestone physicists have pursued for nearly fifty years. That they arrived here separately, using different methods, is itself significant: it suggests the concept is sound, not an artifact of any single laboratory's particular approach.
Unlike conventional atomic clocks, which track electrons jumping between energy levels in an atom's outer shell, nuclear clocks peer deeper — measuring how laser light interacts with the nucleus of thorium-229 atoms embedded in calcium fluoride crystals. Because a nucleus is far smaller than the electron cloud surrounding it, the measurements can in principle be far finer. Today's best atomic clocks lose or gain only a single second over billions of years; nuclear clocks promise to do better still, while potentially being built smaller and more durable.
Both instruments remain works in progress. Schumm is candid that Vienna's clock is still far from its target performance. Yet the two teams already hold complementary pieces: Vienna has produced thorium crystals of higher concentration and better optical quality; Beijing has built the more powerful laser. The natural next step, Schumm suggests, is to combine both.
Even in its unfinished state, the Vienna clock was used to search for dark matter — the invisible substance thought to make up most of the universe. It detected nothing, but in attempting the experiment it matched the performance of the world's finest atomic clocks, demonstrating that nuclear timekeeping is already serious science. Schumm sees ahead a landscape of applications: satellite navigation, data synchronization, precision surveying, and fundamental physics research. What was once a dream shared across generations of physicists is now a working instrument in two laboratories, each holding what the other needs.
Two research teams working on opposite sides of the world have independently built what scientists are calling the first operating nuclear clocks—a breakthrough that could reshape how we measure time and what we can learn about the universe itself.
The Vienna team, led by physicist Thorsten Schumm at TU Wien, and the Beijing team, led by physicist Shiqian Ding at Tsinghua University, each arrived at functioning nuclear clocks using different technical methods. That they reached this milestone separately and nearly simultaneously matters more than it might seem. It suggests the underlying concept is solid, not dependent on one lab's particular tricks or equipment. Schumm, who has been pursuing this goal since 2008, calls it encouraging. Ding notes that physicists have been dreaming of nuclear clocks for nearly fifty years.
The name is misleading. These clocks are not powered by nuclear reactions. Instead, they work by using powerful lasers to track how light interacts with the nucleus of an atom—specifically, with thorium-229 isotopes embedded in solid calcium fluoride crystals. This is fundamentally different from conventional atomic clocks, which measure time by monitoring electrons as they jump between energy levels in an atom's outer shell. By measuring transitions inside the nucleus itself rather than in the electron shell surrounding it, nuclear clocks can theoretically achieve far greater precision. A nucleus is vastly smaller than the electron shell, which means the measurements can be correspondingly finer.
The best conventional atomic clocks today can run for billions of years while losing or gaining only a single second. These instruments have been essential to modern life—they keep global navigation satellites synchronized, they anchor the internet, they coordinate cellular networks and fiber-optic communications. Nuclear clocks, once fully developed, promise to do the job even better. They may also be built smaller and more robust than today's delicate atomic clocks.
But the technology is still rough. Schumm is candid about this: the Vienna clock remains far from its target performance. The researchers are still in the phase of perfecting the fundamental design. Yet there is already a path forward. The Vienna team has produced thorium crystals with higher concentration and better optical properties than Beijing's. The Beijing team has built a more powerful laser. Schumm sees the obvious next step: combine the best components from both labs to build a significantly better clock.
Beyond timekeeping, nuclear clocks open a door to new physics. The Vienna team used their clock to attempt a precision experiment aimed at detecting dark matter—the invisible substance that makes up most of the universe but has never been directly observed. The experiment did not find dark matter, but the nuclear clock performed at the level of the world's best atomic clocks, proving it could handle the demands of cutting-edge physics research. Schumm describes it simply: the technology gives access to a whole new physics universe. Applications Schumm envisions include satellite-based navigation, synchronization of data transfer, surveying, and metrology—the science of measurement itself. What began as a fifty-year dream is now a working instrument in two laboratories, each with something the other needs, each pointing toward a future where time itself can be measured with unprecedented precision.
Notable Quotes
The creation of a nuclear clock was something that physicists dreamt of for almost 50 years. In my team, we have been working towards this goal since 2008.— Thorsten Schumm, TU Wien
The two teams worked independently and reached operating thorium-229 nuclear clocks at the same time, using different experimental approaches. I think this is very encouraging because it shows that the concept is robust and not dependent on one particular technical implementation.— Shiqian Ding, Tsinghua University