Venice Film Festival pivots to politics with Gaza, Ukraine documentaries

The festival includes films documenting Israeli military killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, ICE deportation raids, and the death of a 5-year-old Palestinian girl.
We will show you these works, we will defend them.
Venice's artistic director has chosen to program controversial films despite protests, signaling a deliberate shift in the festival's identity.
Mark

So Barbera is deliberately programming films that he knows will provoke. Why take that risk?

Mimi

Because Berlin showed what happens when you don't. When political debate overwhelms the festival itself, the institution becomes the story instead of the films. Venice is trying to say: we will show you these works, we will defend them, and we will let cinema do the work.

Luke

But he's also being selective about which politics. He's programming Russian films that Ukraine objects to, but he's not backing down. That's consistency. But I want to know: is he actually defending artistic freedom, or is he defending his own curatorial vision?

Mark

What's the difference?

Luke

One is principled. The other is just stubborn. We don't know yet which one this is.

Mimi

The standing ovation for "The Voice of Hind Rajab" last year—that was 22 minutes. That's not a normal response. The films are speaking to something real in the moment.

Mark

But doesn't that make the festival itself a political statement? Isn't Barbera taking a side by choosing which films to show?

Luke

He is. And he's aware of it. He called the Ukraine complaint a "smear campaign." That's not neutral language. He's made a choice about what kind of festival Venice will be.

Mimi

Maybe that's what a festival has to do now. You can't be apolitical when the world is like this. The only question is whether you're honest about your choices.

Mark

And the stars? Pattinson, Clooney, the Gallaghers—are they window dressing?

Luke

They're a hedge. Venice is saying: we're serious about politics, but we're still Venice. We still have glamour, we still have cinema as cinema. It's a both-and move.

Mimi

It's also practical. You need the stars to keep the festival alive. But this year, they're not the main event.

  • Films documenting Israeli military killings in Gaza, ICE deportation raids, and Belarusian repression signal that Venice has traded the red carpet for the front lines of global conscience.
  • Ukraine's government has formally protested the inclusion of a Russian-born director's film whose lead actor has never condemned the war, calling the decision a 'deeply worrying signal' — and Barbera has fired back, calling it a smear campaign.
  • Berlin's Berlinale, once the home of activist cinema, has fractured under the weight of Israeli-Palestinian conflict debates, leaving Venice to inherit — and redefine — that contested territory.
  • Barbera is threading a difficult needle: stars like Clooney, Pattinson, and the Gallagher brothers still arrive, but they now share the Lido with four-hour Musk exposés and documentaries built from secret deportation footage.
  • The festival's ability to hold both gravity and glamour without collapsing into a battleground — as Berlin did — will be tested across eleven days beginning September 2.

Each year, the great film festivals serve as mirrors held up to the world's conscience — and in 2026, Venice has chosen to reflect back its most turbulent face. Under director Alberto Barbera, the 83rd edition of the Mostra opens September 2 on the Lido with a program he calls the festival's most political ever, drawing cinema into direct confrontation with the wars in Gaza and Ukraine, authoritarian repression, and the machinery of modern power. Where Venice once offered the world glamour as a kind of shelter, it now offers urgency as a form of witness — a deliberate repositioning at a moment when its rival in Berlin has been nearly consumed by the very controversies Venice is choosing to embrace.

For years, the Venice Film Festival wore its identity comfortably: red carpets, Oscar campaigns, movie stars trading quips at press conferences. The 83rd edition, opening September 2, looks strikingly different. Artistic director Alberto Barbera has assembled what he calls Venice's most political program ever — one that reaches into Gaza, Ukraine, Belarus, and the streets of Minneapolis to ask what cinema owes the world in crisis.

The lineup is striking in its breadth. Danny Boyle opens the festival with a film tracing Rupert Murdoch's tabloid origins. What follows includes an Israeli-made documentary on military killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, a chronicle of Putin's war on independent journalism, a Deutsche Welle co-production on Belarusian repression, Alex Gibney's four-hour portrait of Elon Musk — already denounced by its subject as a hit piece — and Laura Poitras's documentary built from undisclosed footage of ICE deportation raids in Minneapolis.

This pivot is partly a response to Berlin's unraveling. The Berlinale, long the home of activist cinema, has been consumed in recent years by political conflict — particularly over the Israeli-Palestinian war — to the point where its future feels uncertain. Venice, by contrast, has been leaning into political programming without flinching. Last year, a docudrama recreating the killing of a five-year-old Palestinian girl by Israeli forces in Gaza received a 22-minute standing ovation, a festival record. Barbera declined to call Israel's campaign a genocide, but he did not pull the film — and he has not retreated now.

His steadiness is being tested. Ukraine's government has formally protested the inclusion of Russian-born director Ilya Khrzhanovsky's 'DAU,' objecting that its lead actor, conductor Teodor Currentzis, lives in Russia and has never condemned the war. Barbera called the criticism a smear campaign. Khrzhanovsky responded that his film is an artistic statement about totalitarianism, not an instrument of Russian state policy.

Venice has not abandoned its stars — Clooney and Burstyn will receive lifetime achievement honors, Pattinson and Malkovich appear in competition films, and the Gallagher brothers are expected for the Oasis reunion documentary. But the festival's center of gravity has shifted. Barbera has made a calculated wager: that cinema can hold both glamour and gravity, and that Venice can be a forum rather than a battleground. Eleven days will tell whether he is right.

The Venice Film Festival has spent the last decade cultivating a particular image: red carpets, movie stars, the machinery of awards season in its finest clothes. This year, the 83rd edition opening September 2 looks fundamentally different. The festival's artistic director, Alberto Barbera, has assembled a program he describes as Venice's "most political" ever—one that trades glamour for urgency, and uses cinema as a vehicle for reckoning with the world's most contested conflicts.

The shift is deliberate and unmistakable. Danny Boyle's opening film, "Ink," traces Rupert Murdoch's 1969 takeover of The Sun tabloid, the origin point of a right-wing media empire. But the real weight of the festival lies in what follows over eleven days on the Lido. There is "Naza," a documentary from Israeli filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor that examines Israeli military killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. There is Julia Loktev's "My Undesirable Friends Part II — Exile," a chronicle of Vladimir Putin's crackdown on independent journalism in Russia. Andrei Kutsila's "Letters From the Silenced Country," a co-production involving Deutsche Welle, ZDF/Arte, and Polish television, documents repression in Belarus and will premiere here. Alex Gibney's four-hour documentary on Elon Musk—a film Musk has already denounced as a "hit piece" without seeing it—will screen in competition. And Laura Poitras, the Oscar-winning director of "Citizenfour," will present "They're Here," a documentary she made with Rachel Lauren Mueller using previously undisclosed footage of ICE deportation raids in Minneapolis last January.

This represents a sharp departure from Venice's recent identity. For years, under Barbera's direction, the festival had cultivated itself as a place for movie stars and Oscar campaigns—the venue where you went to see Timothée Chalamet on the red carpet or watch George Clooney and Brad Pitt trade jokes at a press conference. Berlin and, to a lesser extent, Cannes had claimed the territory of political cinema and the contentious debates that accompany it. Venice had chosen a different lane.

But Berlin's reputation as a festival for activist cinema has fractured. Over the past three years, political argument—primarily centered on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—has overwhelmed discussions of cinema itself at the Berlinale, to the point where the festival's future now looks uncertain. At this year's edition, jury president Wim Wenders faced online backlash for suggesting that filmmakers "have to stay out of politics." Days later, when Syrian-Palestinian director Abdallah Al-Khatib called out the German government at the awards ceremony for being "partners in the genocide in Gaza by Israel," the fallout nearly cost Berlinale director Tricia Tuttle her position. The festival, in other words, has become a battleground rather than a forum.

Venice, by contrast, has spent the past two years leaning directly into political cinema without flinching. Last year, Kaouther Ben Hania's "The Voice of Hind Rajab" premiered here—a docudrama that recreates the killing of a five-year-old Palestinian girl and her family by Israeli forces in Gaza City. The film received a 22-minute standing ovation, a Lido record. Thousands marched on the island in protest of the war in Gaza. Filmmakers called on Barbera to label Israel's campaign "a genocide." He declined to use that language, speaking instead of his "huge sadness" over the suffering in Gaza and Palestine. But he did not retreat from programming the film, and he has not retreated now.

That steadiness is being tested. Ukraine's Foreign Ministry, Culture Ministry, and its embassy in Italy have filed a formal complaint over Barbera's decision to include Ilya Khrzhanovsky's "DAU," an art house drama about life under Soviet rule in Ukraine, in official competition. Khrzhanovsky is Russian-born, though he renounced his citizenship and now lives in exile in Berlin. The film's lead, conductor Teodor Currentzis, still lives and works in Russia and has never publicly condemned the war on Ukraine. The Ukrainian government's statement said the programming decision "sends a deeply worrying signal" given the ongoing conflict. Barbera has called the criticism a "smear campaign" from people who have not seen the film. Khrzhanovsky responded on Facebook on August 20: "'DAU' is not an instrument of Russian state cultural policy. It is an artistic statement about the nature of totalitarian evil."

Venice has not abandoned the machinery of stardom entirely. Robert Pattinson will arrive for "Primetime," playing a controversial US reality television producer. John Malkovich and Sam Rockwell appear as CIA agents in Martin McDonagh's "Wild Horse Nine," set on the eve of the Pinochet coup in Chile. Javier Bardem and Penélope Cruz star as a married couple in Florian Zeller's "Bunker," about an architect commissioned to build a nuclear shelter for a billionaire. George Clooney and the 93-year-old Ellen Burstyn will be on hand to receive Golden Lion awards for lifetime achievement. Wim Wenders, fresh from the Berlin controversy, brings a gentler work—a 3D documentary on Swiss architect Peter Zumthor. Werner Herzog returns to narrative filmmaking for the first time in seven years with "Bucking Fastard," starring real-life sisters Kate and Rooney Mara. And for those seeking escape, Liam and Noel Gallagher are expected for the premiere of the Oasis reunion documentary "Don't Look Back in Anger."

But the festival's center of gravity has shifted. Barbera has made a calculated choice: to position Venice not as a refuge from the world's conflicts, but as a space where cinema engages them directly. Whether that choice holds—whether the festival can sustain both the glamour and the gravity—will become clear over the next eleven days.

DAU is not an instrument of Russian state cultural policy. It is an artistic statement about the nature of totalitarian evil.
— Director Ilya Khrzhanovsky, responding to Ukrainian government objections
Sends a deeply worrying signal given the war.
— Ukrainian Foreign Ministry, Culture Ministry, and embassy in Italy, on the programming of 'DAU'
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Deutsche Welle ↗
Contáctanos FAQ