In the quiet afterglow of an election that handed Democrats a larger Senate majority, a familiar question of who should lead has surfaced again, as Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland announced that he will challenge Senator Chuck Schumer of New York for the post of majority leader. The moment is awkward, since the party had only just begun to savor its gains and prepare for January. Beneath the procedural contest lies an older human tension between loyalty to those who have carried a cause and the restless belief that a new mandate calls for new hands. Dec. 1 will show whether the caucus see
Van Hollen Launches Bid to Unseat Schumer as Senate Democrats' Leader Ahead of January Majority
"Am I the underdog? Yes."
Mark
Why does a leadership fight matter when Democrats just won?
Mimi
Because the win set the terms. Van Hollen says voters wanted lower costs and an end to the Iran war, and he argues new leadership is needed to deliver that. Schumer's side says the results are the argument for keeping him.
Luke
Worth noting that's Van Hollen's reading of the midterms. The reporting doesn't show voters chose a leader or a leadership style.
Mark
He claims more than 10 senators. Is that solid?
Luke
No. It's his own count, out of 55. Schumer says he has enough commitments, and that's also his side's claim. Neither number is verified.
Mimi
And the vote is secret, so public statements may not match ballots. Some senators have stayed quiet to avoid pressure.
Mark
What about the pressure from outside the Senate?
Mimi
Progressive groups are expected to back Van Hollen, and some donors reportedly plan to threaten 2028 primary challenges against senators who don't.
Luke
That comes from one anonymous person familiar with the strategy. It's a plan described secondhand, not something any group has announced.
Mark
Does the 2028 presidential talk matter here?
Luke
He's only "said to be" weighing it. Nothing in the reporting says it's driving this.
Il Polso
- A sudden leadership challenge has landed on Democrats just as they were celebrating a larger Senate majority.
- Van Hollen calls himself the underdog yet claims more than 10 of the 55 caucus members are behind him, while Schumer insists his commitments are enough to win.
- Progressive allies like Bernie Sanders and newly elected Abdul El-Sayed are rallying behind the challenge, and advocacy groups may mobilize pressure.
- Secret-ballot voting on Dec. 1 leaves the outcome uncertain, and the result will set the caucus's direction before it takes the majority on Jan. 4.
In the quiet afterglow of an election that handed Democrats a larger Senate majority, a familiar question of who should lead has surfaced again, as Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland announced that he will challenge Senator Chuck Schumer of New York for the post of majority leader. The moment is awkward, since the party had only just begun to savor its gains and prepare for January. Beneath the procedural contest lies an older human tension between loyalty to those who have carried a cause and the restless belief that a new mandate calls for new hands. Dec. 1 will show whether the caucus sees its future in the steady hand that won these seats or in the younger voice that hopes to change how they are used.
On Thursday evening, Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland told MS Now that he would run against Senator Chuck Schumer of New York for Senate majority leader. Democrats had been celebrating their new majority and planning for January, so the timing landed awkwardly. Van Hollen, 67, said the effort was not about any one person but about answering voters who want lower costs and an end to the war against Iran. He said more than 10 of the 55 Democratic senators and senators-elect back him, and when asked whether he was the underdog, he answered simply, "Yes."
Schumer, 75, responded that he welcomed the conversation but had enough commitments to be re-elected. He pointed to the results, including the flipped seats his campaign effort helped secure, which brought Democrats from 47 to as many as 56 seats.
Van Hollen has a long record, from the Maryland legislature and a close alliance with Speaker Nancy Pelosi to leading House and Senate campaign efforts and winning Barbara Mikulski's seat. He has pushed to cut off funding for the Iran war and said the party's Senate campaign arm should refuse AIPAC money. Sanders and incoming senator Abdul El-Sayed have backed him, and El-Sayed said, "We need to earn our mandate. That demands new leadership." Progressive groups may mobilize, and some donors reportedly threaten primary challenges against senators who do not support him.
Schumer's allies, including John Fetterman, Brian Schatz and Angus King, defended his record and urged unity. King asked, "Why would you fire the manager when you just won the World Series?"
The result remains uncertain. Secret-ballot votes can surprise, and some senators are keeping their views private. Van Hollen argued that circumstances can change. The Senate Democrats will vote behind closed doors on Dec. 1, before taking the majority on Jan. 4.
On Thursday evening, in an interview on MS Now, Senator Chris Van Hollen of Maryland announced that he will run against Senator Chuck Schumer of New York for Senate majority leader. The timing is awkward for his party. Democrats were still celebrating their new Senate majority and planning for January when the challenge landed.
Van Hollen, 67, said the effort was "not about any one individual." He framed it as a matter of answering what he called the call of the American people in the midterms: bring down costs and end the war against Iran. He said he had talked with a large number of Democratic senators, including incoming ones, and that he did not think Schumer had a lock. By his count, more than 10 of the 55 Democratic senators and senators-elect are behind him. "Am I the underdog?" he asked. "Yes."
Schumer, 75, answered in a statement. He welcomed a discussion about the caucus's future but said he has enough commitments to be re-elected leader. He pointed to the results: "55 seats and counting." He oversaw the Senate Democratic campaign effort that has flipped at least eight seats. Democrat Scott Colom was called the winner in Mississippi on Wednesday, and in Alaska, where no result has been called, Democrat Mary Peltola is slightly ahead. Democrats went from 47 seats to 55, possibly 56.
Van Hollen's résumé is long. The son of a diplomat, he entered the Maryland legislature and then won a very competitive House primary as an underdog, taking his seat in 2002. He became a close ally of Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a leading voice on budget issues. He led the House Democratic campaign effort in 2008, when the party expanded its majority as Barack Obama was elected, and again in 2010. When Barbara Mikulski of Baltimore retired in 2016, he won her Senate seat, and colleagues promptly put him in charge of their campaign organization. In the Senate he has focused on budget and foreign policy and has pushed to cut off money for the Iran war. On Thursday he also said the party's Senate campaign arm should take no money from AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobbying group many progressives have shunned. He is also said to be weighing a 2028 presidential run.
His support comes from the left. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, an independent aligned with Democrats, said this week he would oppose Schumer and had encouraged Van Hollen to run. Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, who had urged Van Hollen to seek the post during his own campaign, said he was proud to endorse him. "We need to earn our mandate," El-Sayed said. "That demands new leadership." According to one person familiar with progressive strategy, who spoke anonymously, groups such as MoveOn, Indivisible and the Working Families Party are likely to mobilize behind Van Hollen. Some donors reportedly plan to threaten primary challenges in 2028 against any Democratic senator up for re-election who does not support him.
Schumer's defenders were quick to speak. Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania said the party went from 47-53 to 55 or 56, and "I don't understand why that's a conversation." Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii, who endorsed Schumer and credited him with the victory, welcomed talk about the path ahead but urged colleagues to move quickly to vote, unify and get to work. Senator Angus King of Maine, the other independent who caucuses with Democrats, also backed Schumer, citing his experience and mastery of Senate process. "Why would you fire the manager when you just won the World Series?" he asked.
The outcome is less certain than Schumer's camp suggests. Leadership votes are by secret ballot and can be unpredictable, and some senators have held back public support to avoid pressure from those pushing to depose him. "Circumstances change," Van Hollen said. "It is one thing to have someone's support when you're the only choice." Senate Democrats vote behind closed doors on Dec. 1, ahead of taking the majority on Jan. 4.
Citazioni salienti
Why would you fire the manager when you just won the World Series?— Sen. Angus King of Maine
It is one thing to have someone's support when you're the only choice.— Sen. Chris Van Hollen
Vuoi la storia completa?
Leggi l'originale su The New York Times ↗