Chuck Schumer has led Senate Democrats for years, and now a midterm wave that handed his party a larger majority than many expected has opened a rare internal reckoning. Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, pressing the case that the party needs both a new strategy and new leadership, is seeking the caucus's top job, and the question will be settled in a closed-door, secret-ballot vote in December. Each side claims the numbers, but in a chamber where a senator's private word and public vote can diverge, the true count remains unknown. What unfolds in the coming weeks will show whether a victory
Van Hollen Launches Bid to Unseat Schumer as Senate Democratic Leader After Midterm Gains
"I'm confident of winning the leadership contest," Schumer said from his car.
Mark
Why does this contest matter so much right now?
Mimi
Democrats just won a large Senate majority nobody expected. Whoever leads the caucus sets how that majority is used, and Van Hollen is arguing the party needs a new strategy and a new leader.
Mark
What's the math?
Mimi
A majority of the caucus, roughly 28 or 29 senators. Schumer's aides say he has the commitments. Van Hollen says he has more than ten.
Luke
Both of those are the campaigns' own claims. Neither number has been independently confirmed, and the first is secondhand, from aides speaking to the New York Times.
Mark
And the vote is secret?
Mimi
Yes, a closed-door secret ballot. Senators can privately break with Schumer without anyone knowing.
Luke
Which cuts both ways. A private commitment to Van Hollen is just as unverifiable as one to Schumer.
Mark
Who has said no to Schumer publicly?
Mimi
At least six incoming members, including senators-elect El-Sayed, Jackson, Flanagan and Hamilton, plus Sanders and Slotkin. Slotkin wants a concrete, different plan rather than ruling anyone out outright.
Luke
Worth noting that El-Sayed and Flanagan named Van Hollen as a suitable alternative, but the others haven't said who they'd back. Opposition to Schumer isn't the same as support for Van Hollen.
Mark
What about the 2028 talk?
Mimi
He said he'd considered a presidential run and now believes the Senate is where he can make the biggest difference.
Luke
That's his stated intent. Whether it's the whole story, we can't know from this reporting.
Der Puls
- Schumer and Van Hollen are each claiming the votes they need in a December caucus contest that neither side can yet verify.
- Public defections are multiplying, with four incoming senators-elect and two sitting senators, Sanders and Slotkin, refusing to back Schumer.
- The secret ballot means any senator can privately say one thing and vote another, keeping the outcome deeply uncertain.
- Van Hollen is calling nearly the entire caucus while insisting his focus is on the Senate, not a presidential run.
- The situation is described as very much in flux, with the final result hinging on whether more senators step forward before the vote.
Chuck Schumer has led Senate Democrats for years, and now a midterm wave that handed his party a larger majority than many expected has opened a rare internal reckoning. Maryland Senator Chris Van Hollen, pressing the case that the party needs both a new strategy and new leadership, is seeking the caucus's top job, and the question will be settled in a closed-door, secret-ballot vote in December. Each side claims the numbers, but in a chamber where a senator's private word and public vote can diverge, the true count remains unknown. What unfolds in the coming weeks will show whether a victory at the polls can translate into unity about who should lead the party forward.
As Chuck Schumer left the Capitol on Thursday, a reporter asked whether he worried about Chris Van Hollen mounting a challenge. After a moment of silence, Schumer leaned out of his car window and said he was confident of winning the leadership contest.
The exchange unfolded as Van Hollen made his case that Senate Democrats need a new strategy and a new leader, a message sharpened by a midterm wave that gave the party a larger Senate majority than few had predicted. He told MSNBC's Jen Psaki that he has been calling nearly every member of the caucus, and that the response leaves the race "very much in flux."
The vote will not happen until December, and a winner needs roughly 28 or 29 senators. Schumer's aides say he already has the commitments he needs, while Van Hollen claims more than 10 of his own. Because the caucus votes by secret ballot, neither claim can be checked, and a senator's private assurance may not match the ballot.
Opposition is already visible. Four Democratic senators-elect who won close races, including Abdul El-Sayed, Troy Jackson, Peggy Flanagan and Adam Hamilton, have said they will not keep Schumer, and El-Sayed and Flanagan have named Van Hollen as an acceptable alternative. On Tuesday, Bernie Sanders said plainly he would not support Schumer's reelection, while Elissa Slotkin left the door open, asking for a concrete and clearly different plan.
Van Hollen, who once explored a 2028 presidential bid, rejected the idea that this challenge is a stepping stone. He said he believes the party can make its greatest impact by answering the mandate voters have given it in the Senate. Before December, the questions are whether more senators will speak up, whether Schumer's confidence survives a secret ballot, and whether Van Hollen's focus holds.
As Chuck Schumer left the Capitol on Thursday, a reporter from MS NOW asked how he would fare against a challenger like Chris Van Hollen, and whether he was worried the Maryland senator might get in. Schumer ignored the question at first. Then, as he got into his car, he put his head back out and said: "I'm confident of winning the leadership contest."
The exchange came as Van Hollen was making his own case that Senate Democrats need both a new strategy and a new leader. He is pressing that argument after a midterm wave that handed the party a large Senate majority few had anticipated. Asked about Schumer's prospects, Van Hollen said his view was that the focus should be elsewhere at this point. But he also told MSNBC host Jen Psaki that he has been calling nearly every member of the caucus, or at least trying to, and that the feedback leaves the situation "very much in flux."
The vote itself is still weeks away. Senate Democrats will not hold leadership elections until December, which gives both men time to lobby. A winner needs a majority of the caucus, roughly 28 or 29 senators. Schumer's aides told the New York Times over the weekend that he already has the commitments he needs. Van Hollen told Psaki that he has more than 10 commitments of his own.
Those competing claims are hard to test, because the caucus votes behind closed doors by secret ballot. A senator can tell Schumer one thing and mark a ballot another way without anyone seeing it.
Some opposition is already public. At least six members of the incoming caucus have signaled they will not back Schumer. Four Democratic senators-elect campaigned against keeping him as leader and repeated that position this week: Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, Troy Jackson of Maine, Peggy Flanagan of Minnesota and Adam Hamilton of Kansas. All four won closely contested races last week. El-Sayed and Flanagan have both named Van Hollen as an acceptable alternative.
On Tuesday, two sitting senators joined the chorus. Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent, and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan announced at a press conference that they would not support Schumer. Sanders was blunt: he will not be supporting Schumer's reelection as Democratic leader. Slotkin left a little room, saying that whoever wants her vote must show her a concrete plan that is definitively different.
Van Hollen has cast himself as an underdog before. He previously said he was "kicking the tires" on a 2028 presidential bid, and as talk of a leadership challenge grew, some onlookers suggested the real aim was to raise his profile for a White House run. He rejected that framing on Thursday. He told Psaki he had considered running for president and had said so openly, but now believes the party can make the biggest difference by responding to the opportunity voters have given it in the Senate.
What to watch before December is whether more senators commit publicly, whether Schumer's claim of locked-in votes holds under a secret ballot, and whether Van Hollen's focus on the Senate stays as firm as he says it is.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
I'm confident of winning the leadership contest.— Sen. Chuck Schumer, to MS NOW
I will not be supporting Chuck to be reelected as the Democratic leader.— Sen. Bernie Sanders
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei MS NOW ↗