US secures 100-year control of Venezuelan oil reserves in controversial deal

To the victor belong the spoils, right?
Trump explained the Venezuela oil deal to supporters as a return to historical practice of military conquest and resource seizure.
Mark

So Trump says this deal doubles American oil reserves. Is that mathematically true?

Mimi

Not quite. The US has about 46 billion barrels proven. Venezuela's 65 billion would add to that, but it's not a doubling—it's more like a 40 percent increase. The claim depends on how you count it.

Luke

And we should note: those 65 billion barrels are still in the ground in Venezuela. The US doesn't own them yet. The deal gives control, but extraction takes years. Trump's talking about reserves as if they're already in American tanks.

Mark

Why did this happen now? Why January? Why this deal in August?

Mimi

Maduro had been in power since 2013, but 2026 changed everything. Trump authorized his abduction in January, installed Rodriguez, and suddenly had leverage. The August announcement comes right before midterms, when gas prices matter to voters.

Luke

That's the political timing. But there's also the Iran war—it started in February, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, and global oil prices spiked. Gas in America hit record highs for August. Trump needs a story about bringing prices down.

Mark

Is this legal?

Mimi

International law says countries have permanent sovereignty over their resources. Experts call US intervention illegal. But Trump's administration argues Venezuela stole American oil through nationalization—that early US exploration created a claim.

Luke

That's a creative argument with no legal foundation. No country recognizes it. And it's worth noting: the deal is 100 years. That's longer than most nations have existed in their current form. It's not a lease. It's a transfer of control.

Mark

What does Rodriguez get out of this?

Mimi

Her government estimates $209 billion in taxes and $100 billion in investments. Venezuela's economy is devastated—8 million people have left since 2014. She's framing this as reconstruction.

Luke

But she's also under pressure. Trump told The Atlantic: if she doesn't comply, she'll pay a bigger price than Maduro. That's not a negotiation between equals. And we don't know the actual terms—no details have been released. We're taking both sides' word for what the deal contains.

Mark

Could this happen elsewhere?

Mimi

Trump has said he'd like to do similar things with Iran's oil, maybe even make the Strait of Hormuz a US territory. He's talked about it since 2011.

Luke

The pattern is clear: military intervention, resource extraction, framed as national interest. But Venezuela is the proof of concept. If it works politically—if gas prices do drop before November—then yes, the model could spread. That's what worries critics most.

  • With US gasoline hitting its most expensive month on record and the Strait of Hormuz closed since February, the Trump administration is under acute pressure to deliver cheaper energy — and has turned to Venezuela's vast reserves as its answer.
  • The deal was made possible only after a January 2026 US military operation abducted President Nicolás Maduro; his replacement, Delcy Rodriguez, operates under an explicit presidential threat that non-compliance would cost her 'a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.'
  • International law scholars and energy analysts have condemned the arrangement as illegal under the principle of permanent national sovereignty over natural resources, with comparisons drawn to British imperial oil concessions of the early 20th century.
  • The deal's terms remain deliberately vague — the 65-billion-barrel figure has been called a political 'red herring' timed to boost the administration ahead of November midterms rather than reflecting any concrete extraction agreement.
  • Trump has openly invoked 'Manifest Destiny' and 'to the victor belong the spoils,' signaling that Venezuela may be a template, with Iran's oil reserves and the Strait of Hormuz itself already named as potential next targets.

In a move that redraws the boundaries between national sovereignty and imperial ambition, the Trump administration has announced control over 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil across 17 fields for a century — a deal made possible, critics note, only after the forcible removal of Venezuela's elected president in January 2026. Framed domestically as an answer to record gasoline prices and depleted strategic reserves, the arrangement rests on a legal theory that Venezuela's nationalization of its own resources constituted theft of American property. Whether history will record this as energy policy or as the opening chapter of a new era of resource colonialism remains the defining question of the moment.

On Friday, the Trump administration announced it had secured majority control over 17 Venezuelan oil fields — representing 65 billion barrels, roughly one-fifth of the country's proven reserves — for the next 100 years. President Trump called it the largest oil deal in history, claiming it would more than double American reserves and bring down gas prices for consumers who are currently paying record highs at the pump.

The deal's origins lie in January 3, 2026, when Trump authorized a military operation to abduct President Nicolás Maduro, who now awaits trial in New York. In his place, former vice president Delcy Rodriguez was installed as interim leader. Trump made the terms of her cooperation clear from the start, warning that failure to comply would cost her dearly. Rodriguez has nonetheless presented the arrangement as a triumph, projecting $209 billion in tax revenues and $100 billion in investments for a country from which nearly 8 million people have already fled due to economic collapse and political repression.

The geopolitical backdrop sharpens the urgency. Since the US-Israel war on Iran began in late February, Iran has kept the Strait of Hormuz closed to commercial traffic — cutting off nearly one-fifth of the world's oil and gas supply and sending prices surging. August has become the most expensive month for American gasoline on record. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, meanwhile, had already fallen to its lowest level since 1982.

The administration's legal justification is unconventional: it argues that Venezuela's nationalization of its oil industry in the 20th century constituted theft of American property, giving the US a historical claim to those resources. International law, which enshrines permanent national sovereignty over natural resources, offers no support for this position, and experts have widely condemned the intervention as illegal.

Analysts have compared the arrangement to colonial-era oil concessions, and Trump himself has done little to discourage the parallel, invoking 'Manifest Destiny' and telling a Las Vegas rally that taking Venezuelan oil is 'the old-fashioned way.' He has already gestured toward Iran's reserves and proposed making the Strait of Hormuz a US territory. Whether Venezuela becomes an isolated case or the first in a series of resource claims may be the most consequential question left unanswered.

On Friday, the Trump administration announced it had secured control of 65 billion barrels of Venezuelan oil—roughly one-fifth of the country's proven reserves—in a deal that will grant the United States majority control over 17 strategic oil fields for the next 100 years. President Trump called it "the biggest oil deal in world history" and claimed the arrangement would more than double American oil reserves, which stood at approximately 46 billion barrels by the end of 2024. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve, designed to hold up to 714 million barrels, had shrunk to just 289.7 million—its lowest level since 1982—making the Venezuelan reserves, in Trump's framing, essential to restoring American energy security.

The path to this agreement runs directly through January 3, 2026. For weeks, US military vessels had been positioned off Venezuela's coast. On that date, Trump authorized an operation to abduct President Nicolas Maduro, who had led the country since 2013 through a tenure marked by disputed elections and suppression of political dissent. Maduro now awaits trial in New York on drug and weapons charges. In his place, Trump backed Maduro's former vice president, Delcy Rodriguez, who was sworn in as interim president. The Trump administration simultaneously announced it would take control of Venezuela's oil exports indefinitely. When asked about Rodriguez's compliance, Trump told The Atlantic in January: "If she doesn't do what's right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro."

Rodriguez has presented the deal as a victory for her government, calling it "historic" and saying it would drive "a significant impact on our nation's revival." Her administration estimates the arrangement will generate $209 billion in taxes for Venezuela, plus $100 billion in investments. This framing addresses Venezuela's severe economic crisis—nearly 8 million people have fled the country since 2014 due to political repression and economic collapse. The government has blamed mismanagement and US sanctions for the decline, though critics point to corruption and mishandling of state industries as contributing factors.

Yet the specifics of the deal remain opaque. The Trump administration has said it will partner with a private business to extract the oil, but few concrete terms have been released. Oil market researcher Rory Johnston dismissed the 65-billion-barrel figure as "a red herring" with "little relevance to any actual deals," suggesting Trump announced a splashy number to jumpstart the economy ahead of November's midterm elections. The timing is deliberate: the announcement came six months after the US-Israel war on Iran began on February 28, when Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz to commercial traffic. Nearly one-fifth of the world's oil and natural gas supply had flowed freely through that waterway. The closure has spiked global oil prices. The American Automobile Association announced this week that August would be the most expensive month on record for gasoline, with US consumers paying an average of more than $4 per gallon. Trump has promised the Venezuelan oil will "substantially lower Gas Prices for all Americans."

The Trump administration's legal claim to Venezuelan resources rests on a historical argument: that early American fuel exploration in Venezuela created a basis for ownership, and that Venezuela's nationalization of its oil industry constituted theft of American wealth. Stephen Miller, Trump's adviser, called the nationalization "the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property." In December, Trump announced a blockade around Venezuela, accusing the country of having "stolen oil fields" from the US. International law, however, grants countries "permanent sovereignty" over their resources to protect them from unwanted foreign exploitation. Experts have denounced US intervention in Venezuela as illegal under international law.

Critics have drawn comparisons to colonial-era resource extraction. Energy analyst Gregory Brew likened the arrangement to oil concessions sought by the British Empire in the early 20th century, writing that "such a thing is without precedent." Trump himself has embraced the language of "Manifest Destiny" as part of his vision for a "growing nation" that "increases our wealth" and "expands our territory." At a Las Vegas rally this month, Trump told supporters: "We're taking a lot of oil from Venezuela, and we're getting along great with them. That's the old-fashioned way, right? To the victor belong the spoils, right?" He claimed to have "paid for the war" against Venezuela "with what we've taken out" from the country.

The Venezuela model may not remain isolated. Trump has floated the possibility of claiming oil reserves in other regions. In 2011, before his first presidential run, he suggested the US should use military power to extract oil from other countries, specifically referencing Libya and Iraq. During his current term, he has voiced similar intentions toward Iran, posting on social media in April: "With a little more time, we can easily OPEN THE HORMUZ STRAIT, TAKE THE OIL, & MAKE A FORTUNE." He has also proposed making the Strait of Hormuz a US territory. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has framed the Venezuelan deal as a demonstration of Trump's "America First" foreign policy, asserting it will secure "stable reserves and low-cost oil in our Hemisphere." What remains to be seen is whether this arrangement becomes a template for future US resource claims elsewhere in the world.

If she doesn't do what's right, she is going to pay a very big price, probably bigger than Maduro.
— Trump, to The Atlantic magazine in January, regarding interim President Rodriguez
The 65 billion barrel number is a red herring and will have little relevance to any actual deals—the real relevant details of which are still almost entirely unknown.
— Rory Johnston, oil market researcher
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Al Jazeera ↗
Kontakt FAQ