US Plans to Deport More Than 150 Afghans to Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan Via Pakistan

Afghans facing deportation could face persecution and retaliation from the Taliban, including relatives of men who served alongside US forces, and 19 of at least 80 transferred reportedly lacked legal representation.
We don't really care what happens to them
An anonymous senior official described the administration's stance on Afghans facing deportation, per NBC News.
Mark

Why is Pakistan in this story at all?

Mimi

Because the US has no diplomatic relations with the Taliban government. The reported plan sends deportees through Pakistan instead of flying them directly.

Mark

And who are the people being moved?

Mimi

At least 80 Afghans, according to advocate Shawn VanDiver, transferred to Louisiana from 34 ICE facilities. Nineteen reportedly had no lawyer. Many fled after 2021, and some are relatives of men who worked with US forces.

Luke

I'd flag that those numbers come from VanDiver, an advocate, via NBC News. The article doesn't show government confirmation of the 80, the 19, or the 150-plus total.

Mark

What about the official who said the administration doesn't care what happens to them?

Mimi

That's a striking line, but it's anonymous. It's a senior official speaking to NBC, not a published policy statement.

Luke

Right. And the Monday flight is described as something that could happen, not something scheduled and confirmed.

Mark

What are the legal stakes?

Mimi

Lawyers argue third-country deportations could skirt protections against sending asylum seekers where they face persecution. The Supreme Court is expected to take up the legality in December.

Luke

Which means removals may happen before any ruling. And the claim that returnees would be targeted is the advocates' warning; the source doesn't document specific retaliation yet.

Mark

Anything else pending?

Mimi

VanDiver wants Congress to grant temporary protected status. Nothing suggests that's moving yet.

  • At least 80 Afghans were moved to Louisiana from 34 ICE facilities, and 19 of them reportedly had no lawyer at their side.
  • A first deportation flight could leave as early as Monday, leaving very little time for courts or advocates to respond.
  • Families of men who served alongside US forces fear they are being marked for Taliban retaliation the moment they land.
  • The administration has not spoken on the record, and an anonymous official dismissed the risks as no concern of the White House.
  • Advocates are pressing Congress for temporary protected status, while the Supreme Court is not expected to rule on the legality until December.

In the autumn of 2026, more than a hundred and fifty Afghans, many of whom fled after the Taliban returned to power and some of whom are kin to men who once stood beside American soldiers, face being sent back to a country their own government no longer recognizes. The United States holds no diplomatic ties with Kabul, so the route is said to run through Pakistan, a neighbor that has already expelled millions of Afghans of its own. It is a small chapter in a long story of promises made to people who helped a war effort and then were left to its aftermath, and the question now is whether the law can catch up before the planes do.

At least 80 Afghans have recently been moved into Louisiana from 34 ICE detention facilities across the country. Shawn VanDiver, president of the San Diego-based advocacy group AfghanEvac, says 19 of them were transferred without legal representation. The move is part of preparations to deport more than 150 Afghan immigrants and refugees to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, with a first flight that could leave as early as Monday.

The route runs through Pakistan, because the United States has no diplomatic relations with the Taliban government in Kabul. Many of those facing removal fled after the Taliban returned to power in 2021, and some are brothers and sons of men who served alongside US forces. VanDiver warns that sending them back could expose them and their relatives to persecution and retaliation. An anonymous senior administration official told NBC News that the government sees these individuals as having no status in the country and does not really care what happens to them.

The removals fit a wider pattern. President Donald Trump has suspended refugee admissions since returning to office, including for Afghans who sought protection after the 2021 withdrawal, and his administration has pursued third-country deportations more broadly. Immigration lawyers argue such arrangements could sidestep protections against returning people to danger. The legality is expected to reach the Supreme Court in December.

VanDiver has urged Congress to pass temporary protected status for eligible Afghans, which would shield them while conditions in Afghanistan remain dangerous. With a flight possibly days away, the next several days may decide the fate of the first group before any court rules.

At least 80 Afghans have recently been moved into Louisiana, pulled from 34 different ICE detention facilities around the United States. According to Shawn VanDiver, president of the San Diego-based advocacy group AfghanEvac, 19 of them were transferred without legal representation. The movement, as NBC News reported it, is part of preparations to deport more than 150 Afghan immigrants and refugees to Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, with a first flight that could leave as early as Monday.

The route runs through Pakistan. The United States has no diplomatic relations with the Taliban government in Kabul, and the plan reportedly relies on Pakistan as the passage point for deportees. The Trump administration has not, in the account available here, been quoted on the operation on the record.

Many of those facing removal reportedly fled Afghanistan after the Taliban returned to power in 2021. Some have family ties to the two-decade war. VanDiver said that some of those facing deportation are brothers and sons of men who served alongside US forces, families he described as people the Taliban already has every reason to target. He warned that sending them back could expose them and their relatives to persecution and retaliation.

A senior administration official, speaking anonymously to NBC News, did not frame those risks as a significant worry for the White House. The official described the administration's position as being that these individuals have no status in the country, and therefore the administration does not really care what happens to them.

The proposed removals fit a wider pattern. Since returning to office, President Donald Trump has suspended refugee admissions, including for Afghans who sought protection in the United States after the 2021 withdrawal of US-led forces. That marks a turn away from earlier efforts to give refuge to Afghans fleeing Taliban rule and political instability. His administration has also pursued third-country deportations, sending migrants to countries other than their own.

Immigration lawyers and human rights advocates argue such arrangements could be used to get around international protections against returning asylum seekers to places where they may face persecution. The legality of these deportation policies is expected to reach the US Supreme Court in December.

VanDiver has urged Congress to step in by passing legislation that would grant eligible Afghans temporary protected status, which would shield them from deportation while conditions in Afghanistan remain dangerous.

Pakistan could face complications of its own if the deportations pass through its territory. Islamabad has already deported more than two million Afghan nationals since 2023. With a flight possibly days away and the Supreme Court not expected to take up the legal questions until December, the next several days may settle the fate of the first group before any court rules.

Some facing deportation are brothers and sons of men who served alongside US forces, families the Taliban already has every reason to target.
— Shawn VanDiver, president of AfghanEvac
These individuals do not have status in our country, therefore we don't really care what happens to them.
— Anonymous senior Trump administration official, to NBC News
Contáctanos FAQ